ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidential campaign of 1992, a greater proportion than it was in any previous election.

正确答案: B

相关帖子

更多...

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 1800|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助] GWD1-16

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-3-6 22:43:00 | 只看该作者

[求助] GWD1-16

 GWD1-16

Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidential campaign of 1992, a greater proportion than it was in any previous election.

  1. a graeter proportion than it was
            
  2. a greater proportion than

  3. a greater proportion than they have been

  4. which is greater than was so

  5. which is greater than it has been 

KEY:B

这里比较的对象应该是television costs spending ?(基于half——>greater proportion )

可是总觉得a greater porprotion than in any previous election 怪怪的,为什么不放it was 呢

sc实在太差,请见谅~~如果问题很愚蠢,也辛苦耐心解答下~~

沙发
发表于 2009-3-6 23:17:00 | 只看该作者
个人见解,比较对象应该是proportion,也就是half。
这里的a greater proportion应该是一个half的同位语。
无法更详细地解释清楚了……希望你能理解……我的表达能力不太行……
板凳
发表于 2009-3-7 00:52:00 | 只看该作者

A's faults:

1. "it" is wrongly used. Here we want to compare between two proportions: the proportion in the year of 1992 and a proportion in any election year before 1992. "it"  only denotes the proportion of 1992. We should use "that" to denote a proportion before 1992.

2. The tense of Choice A is incorrect. Since "accounted for" is used in past tense, we should change "was" into its past perfect tense "had been". 


[此贴子已经被作者于2009-3-7 0:55:37编辑过]
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2009-3-9 13:51:00 | 只看该作者
谢谢 !!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-26 10:02
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部