ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidential campaign of 1992, a greater proportion than it was in any previous election.

正确答案: B

相关帖子

更多...

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2858|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]老题,但是一直没有确定答案GWD1-16大家看看吧

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-12-31 03:19:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]老题,但是一直没有确定答案GWD1-16大家看看吧

Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidential campaign of 1992, a greater proportion than it was in any previous election.

 

 

  1. a greater proportion than it was

  2. a greater proportion than

  3. a greater proportion than they have been

  4. which is greater than was so

  5. which is greater than it has been

这道题大家好像讨论了很久,我经过比较也发现好像只能选B,但是B真的很别扭!than in any……的表达方式真的可以么?我选B的理由是than 后面的代词应该指代the costs 所以为复数,A不对,而C时态不正确,最后两项不是同位语排除。但是B怎么看怎么别扭,大家的意见呢?


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-12-31 3:46:01编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2006-12-31 09:12:00 | 只看该作者
I chosed C only because they can modify costs
板凳
发表于 2006-12-31 11:19:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用ptr07在2006-12-31 9:12:00的发言:
I chosed C only because they can modify costs

C的时态有问题八?   应该是 proportion 跟 proportion 比.

Thus, B is the best

地板
发表于 2007-1-1 02:09:00 | 只看该作者

I choose B.

5#
发表于 2007-12-19 18:38:00 | 只看该作者
B好一点儿吧,C的时态和主谓我觉得都有问题
6#
发表于 2008-3-27 10:48:00 | 只看该作者

选B,OG11上有一道类似的题目,说明than后面是可以接介词短语的,但是似乎接for更好一些。

102Although Napoleon's army entered Russia with far more supplies than they had in their previous campaignsit had provisions for only twenty-four days

(A)  they had in their previous campaigns

(B)  their previous campaigns had had

(C)  they had for any previous campaign

(D)  in their previous campaigns

(E)  for any previous campaign

Agreement + Verb form

The sentence incorrectly uses the plural pronouns they and their to refer back to the singular noun armyThe verb tense would need to be the past perfect had had rather than the simple past had because this action occurs before the action in the main clauseIn the context of supplies for a campaignthe preposition for is preferable to the preposition in . In cases such as thiswhere the sentence has multiple errorsit is often helpful to look among the answer choices for an alternate construction

A  Pronouns referring to the noun army should be it and itsnot they and their the verb should be had had

B  Their does not agree with the singular noun army.

C  They does not agree with the singular noun armythe verb should be had had.

D  The proposition used should be for, not intheir should be its to agree with army

E  CorrectThis simple construction avoids the problems of pronoun agreement and verb tenseit is clear, correctand concise

The correct answer is E

7#
发表于 2008-3-27 14:18:00 | 只看该作者

B

a应该是 than they had 就对了

than they had accounted

所以C也不对 have been不对

8#
发表于 2008-6-19 15:46:00 | 只看该作者
UP
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-10 10:34
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部