lawyer_1说得好。我完全同意你的高见。 不过,不是我抬杠,是我没弄完全明白。 Studies in restaurants show that the tips left by customers who pay their bill in cash tend to be larger when the bill is presented on a tray that bears a credit-card logo. Consumer psychologists hypothesize that simply seeing a credit-card logo makes many credit-card holders willing to spend more because it reminds them that their spending power exceeds the cash they have immediately available. 我们假设后半句是对的。如果:现在来吃饭的人,全都是穷光蛋,大多数有财务危机的,那,前半句话就得不出来了呢。那心理学家的解释不就有问题了,换句话,他们的解释是建立在“来吃饭的大多数是财务状况好的”,我想在答案中,也应该包含这个暗含条件吧。 本句的结构是:现象A <-------- 推测原因B。。。这种结构的句子,我的理解是:用“由非B推非A”这种句子来加强。 所以,我觉得它的加强,应该是:“如果LOGO不能提醒用户的财务状况,则用户不会付更多钱。” 答案B说:Patrons who are under financial pressure from their credit-card obligations tend to tip less when presented with a restaurant bill on a tray with credit-card logo than when the tray has no logo. 穷得人看到了,会付更少。虽然我承认答案B确实说明了看到LOGO会对穷人有效果,但这两者有些差距哦。不一定说明,富人看到LOGO会有效果呢。。。。。。 |