7月17日至8月逻辑机经讨论

joewoo198256

以下是引用xycc在2009/7/27 18:12:00的发言：
蜜蜂的哪道题，在没有其他选项的条件下，我觉得JJ作者答案正确。首先根据题干可判断清晨和傍晚属于low light情况，蜜蜂清晨出门，回nest时肯定是白天，这样既反驳了low light看不见花之说，也从侧面支持了low light看不见nest之说（白天回的nest）。个人观点，希望大家继续讨论

再看了看题目，你说的没有错，我原来的说法有误。这道题的关键是

1.low light的定义（清晨和傍晚都属于low light）

2,加强的对象：1）在low light的情况下看得见花；2）在low light的情况下找不到巢

想清这两点，问题就迎刃而解了。

Liu_leaf

感谢yaombMM的回复，大家有问题继续讨论哟

lemonrr

那个骨头摔倒的那题

如果有假设是：参加试验的两组老人的骨头是同样的

那我不是应该选这个？

kykosd

好像加拿大的医疗保险是国家包的，，，，，直接去医院本来就不用给太多钱

riverquiet

LZ 工作很负责

cynthia0221

楼主辛苦了～　

对于“一小撮不明真相的群众”楼主不要介意。。。

deuxteer

61. GWD-TN-7-Q14变体，但是选项全变了，这点大家注意。

Criminologist: Some legislators advocate mandating a sentence of life in prison for anyone who, having twice served sentences for serious crimes, is subsequently convicted of a third serious crime. These legislators argue that such a policy would reduce crime dramatically, since it would take people with a proven tendency to commit crimes off the streets permanently（第一处黑体变成这里）. What this reasoning overlooks, however, is that people old enough to have served two prison sentences for serious crimes rarely commit more than one subsequent crime. Filling our prisons with such individuals would have exactly the opposite of the desired effect, since it would limit our ability to incarcerate younger criminals, who commit a far greater proportion of serious crimes.

In the argument as a whole, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

A.      The first is a conclusion that the argument as a whole seeks to refute; the second is a claim that has been advanced in support of that conclusion.

B.       The first is a conclusion that the argument as a whole seeks to refute; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.

C.      The first is the main conclusion of the argument; the second is an objection that has been raised against that conclusion.

D.      The first is the main conclusion of the argument; the second is a prediction made on the basis of that conclusion.

这题选社么呢？选B吗？

对于jj57有疑问

 M公司生产某某东西，但是材料发现运输费和local tax太高了，所以想从N 搬到 P去，
   因为P距离他们的supplier更近，而且P这个地方工人素质高。

问evaluate：
   我选的是 whether 运输费用在未来几年不会升高。

觉得不应该选这个选项，因为因为P本身就比N离supplier更近，所以不论运输费用有没有升高，这都是个加强

还有56. 美国3分之一养猫又养狗，2分之一养狗，选项那个must be true.有人不养猫也不养狗。

应该是养狗的里有一部分养猫吧？

open2 dicussion

[此贴子已经被作者于2009/7/28 21:32:22编辑过]

laura466

我设想的答案是：有些学生或（成绩不好的学生）不论坐到哪都不爱参加课堂讨论

deuxteer

关于LS的这题我也有疑问，不过猜不出答案，觉得给出的答案太片面了，不够说服力

alan722

以下是引用deuxteer在2009/7/28 20:57:00的发言：

61. GWD-TN-7-Q14变体，但是选项全变了，这点大家注意。

Criminologist: Some legislators advocate mandating a sentence of life in prison for anyone who, having twice served sentences for serious crimes, is subsequently convicted of a third serious crime. These legislators argue that such a policy would reduce crime dramatically, since it would take people with a proven tendency to commit crimes off the streets permanently（第一处黑体变成这里）. What this reasoning overlooks, however, is that people old enough to have served two prison sentences for serious crimes rarely commit more than one subsequent crime. Filling our prisons with such individuals would have exactly the opposite of the desired effect, since it would limit our ability to incarcerate younger criminals, who commit a far greater proportion of serious crimes.

In the argument as a whole, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

A.      The first is a conclusion that the argument as a whole seeks to refute; the second is a claim that has been advanced in support of that conclusion.

B.       The first is a conclusion that the argument as a whole seeks to refute; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.

C.      The first is the main conclusion of the argument; the second is an objection that has been raised against that conclusion.

D.      The first is the main conclusion of the argument; the second is a prediction made on the basis of that conclusion.

这题选社么呢？选B吗？

对于jj57有疑问

 M公司生产某某东西，但是材料发现运输费和local tax太高了，所以想从N 搬到 P去，
   因为P距离他们的supplier更近，而且P这个地方工人素质高。

问evaluate：
   我选的是 whether 运输费用在未来几年不会升高。

觉得不应该选这个选项，因为因为P本身就比N离supplier更近，所以不论运输费用有没有升高，这都是个加强

还有56. 美国3分之一养猫又养狗，2分之一养狗，选项那个must be true.有人不养猫也不养狗。

应该是养狗的里有一部分养猫吧？

open2 dicussion

GWD那道同意选B，养猫那道题目已经说了三分之一养猫又养狗了，不会再重复了，我猜应该是不是所有人都养猫，这个比较靠谱