Arnold: I was recently denied a seat on an airline flight for which I had a confirmed reservation, because the airline had overbooked the flight. Since I was forced to fly on the next available flight, which did not depart until two hours later, I missed an important business meeting. Even though the flight on which I had a reservation was canceled at the last minute due to bad weather, the airline should still pay me compensation for denying me a seat on the flight. Jamie: The airline is not morally obligated to pay you any compensation. Even if you had not been denied a seat on the earlier flight, you would have missed your business meeting anyway. A principle that, if established, justifies Jamie's response to Arnold is that an airline is morally obligated to compensate a passenger who has been denied a seat on a flight for which the passenger has confirmed reservations (A) if the only reason the passenger is forced to take a later flight is that the airline overbooked the flight (B) only if there is a reason the passenger is forced to take a later flight other than the original flight's being canceled due to bad weather (C) only if the passenger would not have been forced to take a later flight had the airline not overbooked the original flight (D) even if the only reason the passenger is forced to take a later flight were at the original flight is canceled due to bad weather (E) even if the passenger would still have been forced to take a later flight had the airline not overbooked the original flight .............. -- by 会员 小镜mm (2010/9/28 18:14:25)
给你一个很好的讨论帖:http://forum.chasedream.com/LSAT/thread-67847-1-1.html
我的理解是 A 因为航班overbooked被denied 到下一航班,要赔偿 J 认为A不应该要赔偿 要选一个支持J的选项
(C) only if the passenger would not have been forced to take a later flight had the airline not overbooked the original flight 只有在航班没有overbooked的时候,而乘客被forced to take a later flight的时候,才要赔偿。 即,航班在overbooked的时候是不需要赔偿的,支持了J |