1: not sufficient; not know J's location 2: I think it should be fine because we know the relative position of J to C, and it can be concluded that there is 130 people in the line.
So should B
For 2: We know there 3 people between J and C, and from the question we know that there is a total of 130 people in front of C. Can I think that J is at the 127th position and C is at the 131th position. Unless the question assumes that the line must have people behind C, it is legal to conclude that there is a total of 131 people in the line.
1不对: 1 is same as saying that "at most 64 people <35000". You agree? Well ,consider if we have 64 people with incomes fewer than 35000, will 35000 still be the median?
1: not sufficient; not know J's location 2: I think it should be fine because we know the relative position of J to C, and it can be concluded that there is 130 people in the line.
So should B
For 2: We know there 3 people between J and C, and from the question we know that there is a total of 130 people in front of C. Can I think that J is at the 127th position and C is at the 131th position. Unless the question assumes that the line must have people behind C, it is legal to conclude that there is a total of 131 people in the line.
1不对: 1 is same as saying that "at most 64 people <35000". You agree? Well ,consider if we have 64 people with incomes fewer than 35000, will 35000 still be the median?
显然你理解错误了,条件说了中数是35000,那么第64个人的income必须是35000,按照你的理解,条件1至少63人大于或等于35000,相反也是at most 63 people <=35000,而不是64人