新人报道，求指导！！！

xeyyxzty

When facing the dilemma, people alwaysresort to friends, who are capable of offering reasonable and feasiblesolutions to them. Indisputably, because of the increasingly fierce competitionthat people have to grapple with today, listening to others' advice becomes anindispensable part of one's success. However, does it mean that most peopleoften let others make decisions for them? Personally, people still make thefinal decisions by themselves nowadays for almost everyone is aware of thesignificance of the independence.

First and foremost, although people usually ask friends or the seniors foradvice, it does not equate with letting others make decisions for them. Themain driving force behind this behavior is to make reasonable decisions. It isthe people themselves that make the final decision whether or not to takeothers' advice. Nobody is willing to give other people right to decide theirprivate business. For instance, when I was in high school, I have to make achoice between arts and sciences as my major. I just asked the suggestion frommy parents, who tried to persuade me to go about sciences. However, the reasonthey offered cannot--couldn’t convince me, sofinally I followed my interests to choose thearts, which in my perspective is in tune with my character. This examplereflects that asking others for advice does not mean that giving others rightto make a decision for themselves.

Further, there is no denying that the schooling places considerable emphasis onone's independence, which is the essential character for one's well-roundeddevelopment. I would be hard-pressed to imagine that people who lack theindependence can be distinguished in modern society. The awareness ofindependence inspires people to make decisions on their own. Giving others right or authority to decide your future is unbelievablein such society, where people are all aware of their human rights, especiallythe freedom. A recent survey conducted by Boston University indicates that whenasking whether they are willing to let others make decisions for them, majorityof people clearly refuse to give others such right.

Last but not least, indisputably, people are equipped with the ability to makedecisions by themselves thanks to the dramatic development of moderntechnology. It is not uncommon（这个是有意双重否定吧~有点不习惯+不确定哈） that people are able to contractwith the outside world through the internet, which not only expands theiroutlook but also enables them to make reasonable and feasible decisions ontheir own. When being confronted with trouble, people can search it on theinternet, which is really efficiently andreliable. For instance, when people have to make a choice for their careers,they can obtain sufficient materials from the internet, which are bothobjective and versatile.

Admittedly, listening to others’ advice is necessary, which prompts people totake into account of a wide range of aspects while making choices. However,nowadays people are reluctant to let other make decisions for them because ofthe raising awareness of independence and increasing ability to handle theproblems.

同学写的太好了~也让我意识到我写的有点跑题
我的写作能力很水啊~所以真心找不到什么大问题~
就是既然你从物质上信息的可获得性和精神上追求自由以及他人意见仅供参考的方面说,是不是可以把三者的顺序调整一下~
弄出一个递进的效果,比如把最后一点放到第一点,然后再探讨精神层面的~
当然~这也是个人意见啦,如你的第一点所说~仅供参考

lihaolan

4.6独立
Nowadays, public transport is playing an essential role in modern life, which can reduce the use of automobile, thereby preserving environment and combating the traffic congestion. Meanwhile, the issue whether local citizens have to pay for the public transport triggers intense discussion. Some people insist that there is no need for public to pay for it because the funds all come from the tax revenue. However, they fail to take into account the tight budget in present society, especially during the economic recession. Therefore, I believe residents still need to pay for public transport, which enables them to enjoy the higher quality service.
First and foremost, although the free public transportation is really attractive which can greatly diminish the automobile on the street, it is not without its problems. As is known to us, the free public transport may attract too much people, resulting in the overcrowded public transport. For instance, assume the bus is free to everyone. Even if there is a short distance from people's home to the office, they will take the subway or bus without hesitation. It induces undue waste of the public resource. Worse yet, the budget is so tight today that cannot afford the operation of the public transport, which will drive up the tax rate and make everyone to share the cost. However, it is unjustified for the citizens who do not use the public transport.
Further, there is no denying that the money that people pay for the public transport will be invest in renovation of the public transport, which affords them a sense of comfort when taking the bus or subway. In contrast, without the sufficient money, authorities are unable to provide satisfied service to the public. I would hard-pressed to imagine that I am living in a mass city, where the public transport always break down and brings me great inconvenience. A recent survey conducted by Boston University indicates when being asked whether they are will to enjoy the free bus but with the terrible service, the majority of people would rather to spend money or drive the private car.
Last but not least, when citizens pay for the public transport, they also contribute to the revival of the economy. With the sufficient funds, governments can spend more expenditure in the infrastructure, which not only improves the living standard but also reduces the unemployment rate. A wealth of labor force will be required to go about these projects, which can promote the endurable economic development. What's more, when authorities renovate the bus or subway, it always contributes to the domestic industry. It is a virtuous circle- the prosperous economy generates more works, which makes people consume more, thereby in turn promoting the boom of economy. Myriad of people can benefit from paying for the public transport. Maybe, the money you pay for the public transport just ensures you a job. It seems absurd but is genuine.
Admittedly, free public transport sounds appealing to everyone. However, it also induces numerous problems. Therefore, it is reasonable and feasible for citizen to pay for the public transport, which not only improve the quality of the public transport but also drives up the economy.

one9037476

4.5独立。。。。。字数你妹

lihaolan

4.7独立
With the invention of electronic books, a number of youngsters utilize the IPAD or IPHONE to read books, which can bring them great convenience. As is known to us, the weight of the books far outweighs the electronic books which are capable of containing thousands of books. However, does it mean the printed books will die out in school in the future? Personally, I don't agree, because the printed books have their own advantages, thereby unlikely to be replaced by other machines.
First and foremost, although the paper book which in traditional perspective is not eco-friendly is made of the trees, yet the technology has made extraordinary progress which makes it possible to recycle the printed books. So, it is no need to chop trees in order to produce the books. On the contrary, the advanced electronic seems eco-friendly, but to produce these machines will spend numerous materials. Worse yet, operating these electronic books also requires myriad of power, which is almost generated by the coal or gasoline. Therefore, it is not as beneficial as people think.
Further, there is no denying that the printed books have existed for thousands of year, which reflects that the paper books are bound to have great advantages. The printed books are comparable harmless to people's health compared with the advanced electronic books or other state-of-the-art machines which can breed numerous radiation. Have you ever suffered the headache after looking computer for a long time? This is actually because of the radiation. A recent survey conducted by Boston University indicates that although the cutting-edge machines render people a comfortable life, the radiation generated by them exerts detrimental effects which will drive up the cancer rate. In stark contrast to these advanced machines, the printed books don't have such severely adverse effects. With the increasing awareness of health, a number of students are bound to choose the printed books.
Last but not least, even technology can make great breakthrough in twenty years, it is impossible for every student to afford the electronic books or computers to read books. For instance, those who live in the remote village have to lean on paper books to acquire knowledge. They have no extra money to buy these advanced machines, so the paper books still play an important role in their life. Also, the some students are reluctant to read the electronic books which cannot offer them a sense of comfort. Take myself as an example, when I read the printed books, I can read more efficiently compared with reading the electronic books. I think numerous of students have the same feeling as me.
Admittedly, with the development of science, the electronic books bring great convenience to students. However, there are still some teenagers preferring to read printed books, which are user-friendly and don't cause damage to body. Therefore, some students will still use the printed books in twenty years.

one9037476

4.6独立。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。

lihaolan

one9037476 发表于 2013-4-7 15:10
4.6独立。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。

你好像发错文件了。。。

one9037476

......................................

lihaolan

4.8独立
The jewelry, diamond, gold and the other things which are able to exist for a long time are always appealing to numerous people, especially senior citizens. People are willing to collect these valuable and eternal materials, because their price will be driven up as time goes by. It is not uncommon that the wife always asks husband for these eternal and valuable things as presents in order to memorize their wedding or love. However, does it mean that spending money on jewelry or other eternal things is superior to spending money on something that provides a short-term pleasure? Personally, I don't think so. The pleasure and the merit of the vacation or other activities which can bring temporary happiness cannot be replaced by these eternal materials which lack vivid memory.
First and foremost, people tend to make an illusion that the activities such as vacation can afford nothing but short-term pleasure. However, the reality is that the vacation also provides precious memory, which the jewelry cannot afford. For instance, last year, my family and I went to Maldives for vacation for a week. During the trip, we took a number of photos and brought them home. Even though the vacation is quite short, the memory it provides are eternal. My parents always open the photo album to recall the happy days in there. Also, if you ask a bride whether she is willing to acquire the diamond at the cost of the honeymoon, she will definitely reject because the trip can bring her more satisfaction than the eternal things.
Further, there is no denying that the people who possess the valuable jewelry or diamond are always deprived of sleep due to the fear of thief. They have to come up with various approaches to preserving their property, which is really stress-out and arduous. In stark contrast to these valuable things, nobody is capable of stealing your memory or pleasure obtained from the vacation or other activities. During the vacation, people can totally get away from the daily grind and enjoy great relaxation as well as freedom of life, which not only provides short-term pleasure but also some eternal memory. Moreover, people can restore the memory in their mind, which enables them to recall the memorable events whenever and wherever they want.
Last but not least, the money spent on eternal stuff is much more than the money invested on the vacation. However, the memory that the vacation provides is much more than that from the jewelry and other valuable things. Using the equal money, people can take several trips. Therefore, although the jewelry seems more valuable, the internal value is quite similar. What's more, by looking the jewelry which is devoid of memory, people can obtain little contentment. After people obtain a piece of jewelry, they will no longer cherish it, which is the instinct of human, thereby unable to obtain long-term satisfaction from jewelry or other valuable and eternal materials（The happiness brought by jewelry is temporary, because when they obtain it they just want to pursue the other one.）. On the contrary, because the vacation has passed away, people have great tendency to recall it, which provides them long-term contentment.
Admittedly, the eternal things can exist for a long time, which may be more valuable as time goes by. However, the vacation or other activities which render people a short-term pleasure can also provide people with precious experience and memory. Thus, the vacation and other temporary activities are also a good way to spend money.

jay871750293

LZ太强大了，都快500字了，并且内容也很流畅，膜拜中~~
PS：菜鸟一个，如果有修改错了的，还请原谅...

4.8独立

lihaolan

jay871750293 发表于 2013-4-8 10:13
LZ太强大了，都快500字了，并且内容也很流畅，膜拜中~~
PS：菜鸟一个，如果有修改错了的，还请原谅...

确实有点矛盾--。。我在想想怎么改。