心里带着伤，前进是什么？

abbyseven

加油哦!!!

evayih

网络要上CD嘛……
manhattan看十页看个毛线啊……
话说更新呢！？

-- by 会员 鸩鸩 (2013/1/20 11:55:47)

鸠鸠好强！！！  Savant就得这么监督！！！！

Savant

架子鼓单独听起来会不会很怪？没有听过哎，反正小阿SA要练，训练时候顺便录个音好不好？~~

-- by 会员 darkless011 (2013/1/20 20:31:21)

这个没法录音额。。。架子鼓的solo才是王道呢。。。在录音棚听最好了，录的话细节听不见的，因为有魔鬼音的。。。

Savant

加油哦!!!

-- by 会员 abbyseven (2013/1/20 21:26:07)

谢谢！！！

Savant

网络要上CD嘛……
manhattan看十页看个毛线啊……
话说更新呢！？

-- by 会员 鸩鸩 (2013/1/20 11:55:47)

鸠鸠好强！！！  Savant就得这么监督！！！！

-- by 会员 evayih (2013/1/20 22:05:31)

[/quote]鸩爷巨霸气！！！实话说。。。我很怕她。。。

Savant

额。。。大家帮忙看道题吧。。。谢谢谢谢谢谢！！！

死了一堆脑细胞。。。感觉越想越糊涂了。。。希望大家能帮我拨开天边的乌云呀。。。嘿嘿

One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare it with other companies. This technique, commonly called “benchmarking,” permits the manager of a company to discover better industrial practices and can provide a justification for the
adoption of good practices.
Any of the following, if true, is a valid reason for benchmarking the performance of a company against companies with which it is not in competition rather than against competitors EXCEPT:
(A) Comparisons with competitors are most likely to focus on practices that the manager making the comparisons already employs.
(B) Getting “inside” information about the unique practices of competitors is particularly difficult.
(C) Since companies that compete with each other are likely to have comparable levels of efficiency, only benchmarking against noncompetitors is likely to reveal practices that would aid in beating competitors.
(D) Managers are generally more receptive to new ideas that they find outside their own industry.
(E) Much of the success of good companies is due to their adoption of practices that take
advantage of the special circumstances of their products or markets.

Savant

2013年1月20日

200个单词，40分钟。
20页manhattan
10页逻辑分类
一篇VOA，发现奥巴马说话真是。。。

加油加油。。。明天开始重振旗鼓，长难句！！！拿到书了。。。

鸩鸩

鸩爷巨霸气！！！实话说。。。我很怕她。。。

-- by 会员 Savant (2013/1/20 22:40:01)

莫名其妙就变成这个样子了……不要怕啦，乖~摸下头

鸩鸩

One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare it with other companies. This technique, commonly called “benchmarking,” permits the manager of a company to discover better industrial practices and can provide a justification for the
adoption of good practices.
Any of the following, if true, is a valid reason for benchmarking the performance of a company against companies with which it is not in competition rather than against competitors EXCEPT:
(A) Comparisons with competitors are most likely to focus on practices that the manager making the comparisons already employs.
(B) Getting “inside” information about the unique practices of competitors is particularly difficult.
(C) Since companies that compete with each other are likely to have comparable levels of efficiency, only benchmarking against noncompetitors is likely to reveal practices that would aid in beating competitors.
(D) Managers are generally more receptive to new ideas that they find outside their own industry.
(E) Much of the success of good companies is due to their adoption of practices that take
advantage of the special circumstances of their products or markets.

-- by 会员 Savant (2013/1/20 22:55:40)

首先是对benchmarking的定义，就是自己公司与另外的公司对比，然后别人采取了好的practice，自己就学到问题是，哪个是 要用行业外的公司进行对比，不用同行业内的公司对比 的valid reason
A 同行业的公司对比（competitor）总是关注manager已经采取的practice
  也就不用学practice了，最多是改进，但是benchmarking是要学自己没有的东西，所以要到行业外
B 内部消息很难搞到
  别人不想让你学嘛，就像我们的JJ不想给三哥
C 意思是说这个圈子的人都是老油条了，大家搞来搞去都差不多，跳出圈子可以学到打败对手的方法
D 经理人对圈子外的new idea更容易接受
E 成功的公司是因为他们好好利用了他们特殊的环境和市场
  这里连行业内外都没出现，算是一点他因削弱吧。他们成功是因为利用好了特殊的环境，不是因为学到了行业外的practice

Savant

One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare it with other companies. This technique, commonly called “benchmarking,” permits the manager of a company to discover better industrial practices and can provide a justification for the
adoption of good practices.
Any of the following, if true, is a valid reason for benchmarking the performance of a company against companies with which it is not in competition rather than against competitors EXCEPT:
(A) Comparisons with competitors are most likely to focus on practices that the manager making the comparisons already employs.
(B) Getting “inside” information about the unique practices of competitors is particularly difficult.
(C) Since companies that compete with each other are likely to have comparable levels of efficiency, only benchmarking against noncompetitors is likely to reveal practices that would aid in beating competitors.
(D) Managers are generally more receptive to new ideas that they find outside their own industry.
(E) Much of the success of good companies is due to their adoption of practices that take
advantage of the special circumstances of their products or markets.

-- by 会员 Savant (2013/1/20 22:55:40)

首先是对benchmarking的定义，就是自己公司与另外的公司对比，然后别人采取了好的practice，自己就学到问题是，哪个是 要用行业外的公司进行对比，不用同行业内的公司对比 的valid reason
A 同行业的公司对比（competitor）总是关注manager已经采取的practice
  也就不用学practice了，最多是改进，但是benchmarking是要学自己没有的东西，所以要到行业外
B 内部消息很难搞到
  别人不想让你学嘛，就像我们的JJ不想给三哥
C 意思是说这个圈子的人都是老油条了，大家搞来搞去都差不多，跳出圈子可以学到打败对手的方法
D 经理人对圈子外的new idea更容易接受
E 成功的公司是因为他们好好利用了他们特殊的环境和市场
  这里连行业内外都没出现，算是一点他因削弱吧。他们成功是因为利用好了特殊的环境，不是因为学到了行业外的practice

-- by 会员 鸩鸩 (2013/1/21 8:01:10)

还是不能偷懒，把OG又翻到这题了，觉着逻辑分类上的解释的确是和OG一个意思，但是缩略了，所以不好理解，选E是因为其给的是与competitor向比较的好处和原因，所以不合题意。

谢谢鸩鸩哈！