ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: sarah81
打印 上一主题 下一主题

再次请教GWD-10-9,斑竹给个答案吧

[复制链接]
31#
发表于 2005-5-28 19:36:00 | 只看该作者
如果题目中60percent改成100percent,那么E更好一点。
32#
发表于 2005-5-28 21:45:00 | 只看该作者

选项C是对题目的论据做了一次重复,但是没有给出additional information来进一步支持题目的论点。选项E是对题目的论证进行了无因即无果的证明。综上考虑,还是觉得选项E好一席。


大家可以看一下ETS在OG82里面关于选项C的解释,Since choice C supports something already established, namely, that an earthquake occurred in A. D. 365, C is inappropriate.


82. Excavation of the ancient city of Kourion on the laceType>islandlaceType> of laceName>CypruslaceName> revealed a pattern of debris and collapsed buildings typical of towns devastated by earthquakes. Archaeologists have hypothesized that the destruction was due to a major earthquake known to have occurred near the island in A.D.365.



Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the archaeologists’ hypothesis?



A.        Bronze ceremonial drinking vessels that are often found in graves dating from years preceding and following A.D.365 were also found in several graves near Kourion.


B.        No coins minted after A.D.365 were found in Kourion, but coins minted before that year were found in abundance.


C.        Most modern histories of Cyprus mention that an earthquake occurred near the island in A.D.365.


D.        Several small statues carved in styles current in Cyprus in the century between A.D.300 and 400 were found in Kourion.


E.        Stone inscriptions in a form of the Greek alphabet that was definitely used in Cyprus after A.D.365 were found in Kourion.



82. The archaeologists hypothesized that Kourion was devastated by an earthquake known to have occurred in A. D. 365. Since choice B provides evidence that A.D. 365 was the date when life in Kourion was disrupted, B supports the hypothesis that it was the A. D. 365 earthquake that devastated Kourion. Thus, B is the best answer.



By contrast, choices A, D, and E all give information about artifacts found in or used in Kourion, but they do not specifically point to A. D. 365 as the date of the devastation. Thus, A, D, and E are inappropriate. Since choice C supports something already established, namely, that an earthquake occurred in A. D. 365, C is inappropriate.



33#
发表于 2005-7-11 23:30:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用彼岸在2005-2-6 21:38:00的发言:

这题我先选E,后改为B


C只是重复文中已经说明的事实:60年那批疫苗被病毒感染了,没有任何意义。


E说芬兰的疫苗没有感染,那里的人也没有犯病。并不能说明病是由感染的疫苗而来,可能还有他因


B说60年之后的疫苗由于新技术产生不会被感染了,恰恰说明了现在的病因(源头)是60年被感染的那批疫苗而来的,而不是60年后的。



这与我的做法一样,我当时弃E取B时,心想还好没上当啊

NN能告诉我排除B的理由吗? 晕啊

34#
发表于 2005-7-11 23:31:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用ethyl在2005-5-28 19:36:00的发言:
如果题目中60percent改成100percent,那么E更好一点。

还有,这话很有道理

35#
发表于 2005-7-12 09:50:00 | 只看该作者
B是典型的无关答案。在原文没有给出其他提示的情况下,now发生的事情和过去发生的事情完全没有任何关系,对过去不能产生任何影响,和本文无关。现在的技术可以使其不感染,不等于过去就一定会被感染;即使过去没有这个技术很有可能被感染,也不等于这种感染就一定发生过。还有很多很多其他因素可能影响到感染与否,现在的技术和文章完全没有关系。
36#
发表于 2005-7-12 10:43:00 | 只看该作者

这道题应该选C还是E呢?


我觉得好象C好点.上边有人说题目有2个结论,


SV40 virus is a contributing cause M 病.


被污染的vaccine was the source of the virus found in mesotheliomas decades later.


我觉得E中隐藏了一个条件就是,芬兰有M病.然而M病里没有SV40,这好象是否认了结论1.


题目问的是支持结论2吧.


一点愚见,请NN指点


37#
发表于 2005-7-12 10:45:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用nowandfuture在2005-7-11 23:31:00的发言:


还有,这话很有道理


如果是100%,我觉得E就更不对了.

38#
发表于 2005-7-28 19:58:00 | 只看该作者

我也觉得这题应该选C,用事实对论据的加强,即:vaccine确实被感染了


因为原文说SV是a contributing cause,也就是说SV does not ensure M without asbestos, 也就是说这SV不是M病的充分条件。E这种无因无果加强的方法是针对存在直接因果关系的问题的加强。所以肯定不是内容。


B无关



[此贴子已经被作者于2005-7-28 20:00:37编辑过]
39#
发表于 2005-7-29 11:02:00 | 只看该作者

请大家仔细看提问:support the researchs' hypothesis


而researchs' hypothesis是被污染的疫苗是virus的源头,


C说,最近发现被污染的疫苗确实是源头,从而支持了研究人员先前的猜测。


E说,在芬兰,没有被污染的疫苗不是virus的源头。这跟researchs'hypothesis无关,文中研究人员的假设仅是针对美国的。

40#
发表于 2005-8-4 14:57:00 | 只看该作者
不知原文中这句“a slow-developing cancer”有没有用。vaccine中的virus可能活性很差的,活不了那么多年。似乎可以认为是因为当时使用疫苗导致后来有cancer 那么现在疫苗里还有没有virus跟当时那批疫苗能不能传播病毒又有什么关系呢? 我也知道是支持,不是假设,但总觉得C答案有点傻。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-29 00:32
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部