- UID
- 717474
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2012-2-3
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
10.29Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should focus its budgets more on environmental protection than on economic development.
If we damaged the nature environment, that will be very hard to us to recover it, meantime, we will spend much more money on recovering than protecting. People are less willing come to the local community to invest or consuming. Terrible environment will decrease people's investment motivation. Therefore, I agree that governments should focus its budgets more on environmental protection than on economic development.
Almost everyone likes to live and work at a good environmental city such as Hawaii and Florida. Their beautiful nature environment attractive many tourists; tourists will spend huge amounts of money on sightseeing and hotels. Those consume activity will bring more work opportunity and increase the local tax revenues, and then the government would have more money spend on environment protection and economic development. The local economy is better and better because of the beautiful nature. That will be a win-win solution. Once we damaged the nature, it would never or take a very long time to recovery. During the recovery period, other cities those preserve a beautiful and magnificent nature environment will have an advantage and take a first step to attract more tourists to visit their city.
Furth more, most companies, and factories like to build a branch at a good environment city, but different type of industry will have a huge difference of tax paying. For example, , a small investment company in a financial industry, which has less than fifty employees, will generate same revenue as a manufactory factory, which has one thousand employees. No doubt that a manufactory factory will greatly damage the nature, more employees mean more transportation vehicle requirement that creates lots of traffic and tail gas, factory need plenty of water to produce products. With a huge contrast, a small investment company will not damage the nature environment but bring more revenue to the city, people with higher salaries who are willing to live in a beautiful environment.
In one conclusion, a good environment will attractive more tourist and financial company, they will bring more revenue and tax to the local city that is very good for the economic development. Therefore, the government should spend more budgets on the environmental protection.
|
|