[求助]og-12

emilie

12题看了og的解释还是不怎么理解？请教大家！

linlin315

只要能够解释为什么制造商老早以前把配额和国家的安全问题联系在一起就可以了！
选项C给出了一个原因就是他们在获得政府保护上遇见了困难，言外之意就是说他们想获得政府保护所以才会配额的问题与国家安全的问题联系起来。

emilie

hehe,谢谢斑竹，不过偶问的是12题，呵呵，不是13题：）
go on请教！

linlin315

以下是引用emilie在2003-7-27 18:46:00的发言：
hehe,谢谢斑竹，不过偶问的是12题，呵呵，不是13题：）
go on请教！

linlin315

12题
题中的结论是remove any restricitions将会导致legal costs的下降。原因是remove restricitions将会有更多的律师做广告，做广告的律师usually收较少的费用。
而E说在他们刚开始做广告的时候most律师不会降低他们的费用，不正好说明了在这些律师开始做广告的时候，legal costs不会下降吗？反对了结论！！

emilie

以下是引用linlin315在2003-7-27 21:47:00的发言：
12题
题中的结论是remove any restricitions将会导致legal costs的下降。原因是remove restricitions将会有更多的律师做广告，做广告的律师usually收较少的费用。
而E说在他们刚开始做广告的时候most律师不会降低他们的费用，不正好说明了在这些律师开始做广告的时候，legal costs不会下降吗？反对了结论！！

偶觉得那是反对了前提啊，因为前提假设说remove restrictions 导致更多的律师做广告，而做广告的律师常常收少费用，如果说做广告的时候律师不减少费用，那不是反对前提么？
嘿嘿，偶实在愚钝哦，请继续赐教！

anchoret

以下是引用emilie在2003-7-28 9:04:00的发言：

偶觉得那是反对了前提啊，因为前提假设说remove restrictions 导致更多的律师做广告，而做广告的律师常常收少费用，如果说做广告的时候律师不减少费用，那不是反对前提么？
嘿嘿，偶实在愚钝哦，请继续赐教！

那个不是前提，是命题（有结论）。(很显然，如果前面一个命题不成立，后面的结论自然不成立)


题目中问。。。concerning the overall consumer legal costs,而不是concerning the conclusion.

emilie

知道啦！嗬嗬，谢谢大家，anchoret，我也是22号考哦一起加油咯

elegist

以下是引用emilie在2003-7-28 9:04:00的发言：


偶觉得那是反对了前提啊，因为前提假设说remove restrictions 导致更多的律师做广告，而做广告的律师常常收少费用，如果说做广告的时候律师不减少费用，那不是反对前提么？
嘿嘿，偶实在愚钝哦，请继续赐教！

我也感觉是在反对前提，还请赐教

zhoushao

偶贴一下题目

12. The fewer restrictions there are on the advertising of legal services, the more lawyers there

are who advertise their services, and the lawyers who advertise a specific service usually

charge less for that service than lawyers who do not advertise. Therefore, if the state removes

any of its current restrictions, such as the one against advertisements that do not specify fee

arrangements, overall consumer legal costs will be lower than if the state retains its current

restrictions.

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the argument concerning overall

consumer legal costs?

A. The state has recently removed some other restrictions that had limited the advertising of

legal services.

B. The state is unlikely to remove all of the restrictions that apply solely to the advertising of

legal services.

C. Lawyers who do not advertise generally provide legal services of the same quality as

those provided by lawyers who do advertise.

D. Most lawyers who now specify fee arrangements in their advertisements would continue to

do so even if the specification were not required.

E. Most lawyers who advertise specific services do not lower their fees for those services

when they begin to advertise.