ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 26606|回复: 64
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD-2-11

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-10-30 06:21:00 | 只看该作者

GWD-2-11

Many people suffer an allergic reaction to certain sulfites, including those that are


commonly added to wine as preservatives.  However, since there are several wine


makers who add sulfites to none of the wines they produce, people who would like to


drink wine but are allergic to sulfites can drink wines produced by these wine makers


without risking an allergic reaction to sulfites.  Which of the following is an assumption


on which the argument depends?




A.      These wine makers have been able to duplicate the preservative effect produced


by adding sulfites by means that do not involve adding any potentially allergenic


substances to their wine.


B.      Not all forms of sulfite are equally likely to produce the allergic reactions.


C.      Wine is the only beverage to which sulfites are commonly added.


D.     Apart from sulfites, there are no substances commonly present in wine that give


rise to an allergic reaction.


E.      Sulfites are not naturally present in the wines produced by these wine makers in


amounts large enough to produce an allergic reaction in someone who drinks these wines



这T 做的时候选了B !之后看大家的帖子讨论集中在ADE 上面!看到LAWYER 选E , MINDFREE 开始看错了选了D ,看清楚后马上选了E !


感觉这T 的迷惑性怎么这么大啊!无关选择也很难排除啊!我想了很长时间!感觉A ,D 无关是因为文章一直在说对S 的过敏,而AD 都说了对其他东西的过敏就错了!


B 呢 我仔细看才看出来他说的是FORMS ,其实也是无关吧!文章没有说S 有什么FORM 只类的!


所以选E了就是S 的量上的问题,因为无论如何都得加这个S !不知道思路对不对,LAWYER 帮助看看吧!


但是MINDFREE 举了个例子,


Why D is correct? One simple example: There is no wolf in the woods. So it should be safe for kids to play there. Assumption: there is no other wild animals such as tiger or snake that pose dange to kid.


如果他说的这个对,那D 就不无关了啊!


[此贴子已经被作者于2004-10-30 18:15:55编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2004-10-30 07:17:00 | 只看该作者
你分析得很对,其实只要抓住结论,对WEAKEN SOPPORT ASSUMPTION可以排除很多无关项,很多时候就排除剩下一个。其实D也是同样的问题。因为结论是讲对S的过勉。而D说只说过勉,没具体说对S的过勉
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-10-30 08:14:00 | 只看该作者
谢谢LAWYER 那MINDFREE 举的那个例子对吗?
地板
发表于 2004-10-30 08:38:00 | 只看该作者
对于MINDFREE的例子的结论讲,MINDFREE是对的,因为该结论没有针对WOLF。如果结论改为KIDS CAN PALY THERE WITHOUT RISKING THE ATTACK OF WOLF,则该假设错。因为结论局限于WOLF。楼主的题也一样,因为结论局限于without risking an allergic reaction to sulfites。所以D说的其他物质就无关了。
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-10-30 08:44:00 | 只看该作者
THANX + REALLY! REALLY !
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-10-30 18:18:00 | 只看该作者

严厉支持XY JJ 题目标准化!!(方便所有人的查找)

格式以改,多多注意!

7#
发表于 2004-11-21 23:26:00 | 只看该作者

题目很清楚地写到“。。。。those that are commonly added to wine as preservatives.”


以再讨论naturally presented问题是无意义的(选项E),文章已经通过common added 告诉我们是后来添加的。同时as preservatives告诉我们sulfites是用来做防腐剂的。所以如果那些葡萄酒制造商不添加sulfites的话,他们必须有别的方法来防腐。


所以选A.

8#
发表于 2004-11-23 03:33:00 | 只看该作者

还是有些不明白选E, 因为提干中已指出不加S, 所以似乎不用在讨论S的多少"However, since there are several wine makers who add sulfites to none of the wines they produce"

而D恰好是一个排除它因的选项. 望赐教.

9#
发表于 2004-12-1 03:40:00 | 只看该作者

可能是因为制酒的原料里面就含有sufities,D肯定不对,你看最后一句是

people who would like to drink wine but are allergic to sulfites can drink wines produced by these wine makers without risking an allergic reaction to sulfites

也就是说它对别的过敏和题目没有关系

10#
发表于 2004-12-1 10:44:00 | 只看该作者

感觉应该选E。如果E的Assumption 不成立。Wine中有Sulfites,则直接推翻了题干的结论。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-14 09:56
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部