- UID
- 638703
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2011-6-9
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
7月26号 独立+综合
7月26日101030NA Do you agree or disagree with the followingstatement? People are now easier to become educated than in the past. As the gradual fiercer and increasing developedeconomy, people realized only acquire enough knowledge can improve the survivalcapacity. The individual’s willingness correspondent with government’s endeavormakes education more accessible than the past. To start with, as the GDP and average incomes uprising, people had more financial capacities compared with the past. Take Chinaas an example, China has been through the rapidly changing and roaring growingeconomic; moreover , China has 30 years one child policy, Which created China’sunique national character, one children surrounded by 4 grandparents, 2 youngparents, needless to say the children will get everything she/he wanted, ofcourse, including the best education. Simultaneously, more education format hasbeen developed. From technical college to academic universities, even thecontinues college, as long as you have the willingness, you could apply and getenrolled by those universities or colleges. Even if someone lack of financialsupport, bank loans with no interests for students are available. Moreover, thecontinued school or universities are reachable for those grow up who still wantto get education. Therefore, financial support and diversity education formatprovides more opportunities and accessibility for modern people. Another equally important point is that thegovernment also made a considerable endeavor for education. The governmentprovided more fiscal cost every year. Moreover, Government also encouragesprivate college and universities by offering more tax-free policies. Inaddition, the high payment and package welfare for teacher that provided by thegovernment and school attracted more qualified teacher committed in education. Admittedly, There are still some undeveloped areawhere could not provide enough accessibility of education. However, that notnecessarily says no education at all for them. Simple reading and writing skillare still achievable. Compared with big cities and more developed area, effortstill need to be made. In conclusion, more financial capability, divertingformat of education, provide more opportunities for modern people to achieveeducation. TPO 17
The reading passage explored the issue of the growing population caused growing agriculture has declined the birds. However, the professor holds the opposite opinion, she use 3 specific points to supports her idea.
To start with, the reading passage claims that the human population caused more forests, wetlands and grassland convert into homes, mall, and offices, and consequently the suitable areas for birds had decreased. Therefore, the size of the bird dramatically declined, some even vanished. On the other hand, the professor argues that there are some urban effects on some bird, but also they had provide more suitable area to others, apparently, they even grow and reproduced more than before. It's not a uniformed decline for all birds. Some shrinks and some growth.
Moreover, the reading passage assumes that growing human population with the corresponding growth of agriculture consequently destroyed the habitats thus the harmful for the birds. However, the professor states that not growing population not necessitate the increasing of the agriculture of the land. In fact, they are less and less land was cultivated into former land. The new generated crops were introduced. As a result, no extreme land was needed.
Thirdly, the professor believes that the Pesticides did cause some negative effect on the environment thus to the birds, But the action has been take by two possible changes. One is new pesticides with less toxic has been invented. The other is crop which is unattractive to pest has been developed. Therefore, the pesticides downside has been resolved and less harmful to the birds
In conclusion, the professor clearly indentified the weakness of the reading passage and convincingly show the growth of the population has caused the birds decline is incorrect. |
|