gre呀gre的作文~ 非NN~请不要大意的狠拍吧！

婷婷connie

9.8 综合 麻烦婷婷啦~  第三个点没有听的太清楚，所以不知道编的靠谱不，求第三段重重的拍！
呼呼，尽量重重拍拍，会心疼的~o~
（what加上好一点，引导主语从句）Both the writer and the professor discussingabout is whether it is benefical(beneficial) to have the commercial for fossils. The writer considers such behavior will lead to three negetive（negative） aspects while the professor notes the positive aspects as overweighted.

To begin with, the writer states that the trade (purchase也行)of fossils may reduce the public access to view the fossils and thus they will lose the interests. The professor, however, treats such opinion as flawed since if it is the public university and library that be the owners(这里不太贴切that could gain more accesses to fossils and display them to the public，which contributes to greater exposure), they will not show the fossils to the public either.(这句婷婷木有读懂。。他们就是展给大家看呀)

In addition, the writer worries about the scientists that they may have less chance to study the extinct forms owing to less（听力中没有涉及到这方面的比较，用some就好） important and rarest fossils that have been bought by the millionaires. On the contrary, the professor thinks there is no need to worry about the scientist because it is the scientists to identify the fossils（before they are put values）. And fossils should pass through the scientists' hand first. As a result, they will not miss out the important details after the examination.

Besides, the writer complains that the less professional collectors often destroy the valuable fossils. The professor, in contrast, points out that since the exploring are often raised by universities, it is better to own some destroyed fossils than to give up the fossils still underground.（这个地方确实木有听好，教授说了两点：1.the number of scientific institutions is not enough to the explore so many fossils.2.although commercial collectors may destroy the fossils sometimes, it is better than the maintenance of fossils underground/undiscovered/underearth）小西再听听，把这段写一下

Conclusion：感觉听力至关重要，听懂了才能写~语言上小西已经没有问题拉，赶紧练吧~

gre呀gre

9.9 综合

The topic the writer and the professor are discussing is about the salvage logging. The writer treats it as positive both for the forest itself and for the economy, while the professor casts doubt on it based on the long term view.

Firstly, the writer considers the salvage logging as beneficial owing to the extra space for the growth of the new trees. The professor, however, takes an opposite note since it is not a well condition for the new trees to grow. After the dead trees are moved, the new generation cannot absorb the nutrition from soil provided by dead trees.

Secondly, the writer illustrates that the dead trees offers a great living condition for the insects which will harm the newly born trees. On the contrary, the professor opposes that not all the insects are bad. Besides, the dead trees will not rot within 100 years and thus will not provide a suitable living condition for the insects. Even in the long term, such harmful insects can perfectly feed up the birds living in the forest.

Last but not least, the writer applauds that the salvage logging can provide both the dead trees to the companies for their production and the additional jobs for the local residents. Nonetheless, the professor maintains that such benefit will not last long, not only for the damaged material but also for the outsider being the beneficiary instead of the local residents.

gre呀gre

9.9 独立 写完才发现写超了- -

Compared with people who live in urban areas, the people who live in rural areas can take better care of their families.

Have you ever seen a family member get a heart attack without the ability of giving him a hand? Have you ever had the desire to accompany your parents to have a trip but ended up with an inconvenience in transportation? Have you ever bored with the polluted river around your home? If you have never experienced such situation, never will you understantd the positive aspects of living in urban areas in taking better care of family. Hence, as far as I am comcerned, I hold the view that compared with people who live in rural areas, people living in urban areas can take better care of their family.

First and foremost, there exits no doubt that the level of hospitals in urban areas is much higher than that in rural areas. If someone suffers an emergency, especially the old, can get a quick aid with just dialing a few numbers. To take my grandmother as an example, she gets an heart attack for years. It happened in an evening in last year when she forgot to take the medicine. Right in the mid-night, her heart attack broke out. My grandfather dialed 120 and was told to do some first aid to extend the rescue time. Thanks to the doctors in the ambulance, my grandmother got treatment in time and thus leaves no problems. I cannot even just image what woule it be if the hospital was not nearby.

In addition, people live in urban areas is much more convenient in transportation. The desire, go for a trip, can easily be fulfilled in city if people type in a few words searching for the cheapest ticket. Besides, it is also convenient to go to the airport. As for the people living in rural areas, on the contrary, they cannot enjoy such convenience since there is only few bus stops there and it will take them a long time to go to the airport, which wastes a large proportion of the valuable vacation. It is not a wise choice to waste so much time on the way to the destination and thus waste the pressure time to accompany the family.

What is more, the environment in the city is cleaner. Considering someone’s criticism that air in urban is less fresher than that in country, they may fail to update the information that companies tend to locate their factories in rural areas owing to a lower rent. Taking a quick look in city, in order to raise the room rate, both the government and the estate agent spare no efforts to do the cleaning up such as buiding some gradens and parks, growing more trees and flowers and anything else. Statistics from the magazine Vista shows that the green rate in my city is over 30 percent while it is less than 20 percent in rural areas. After getting off work, people can go for a walk with their family instead of covering their noses in case of the smell from the polluted river in the country.

In a nutshell, I maintain that, compared with rural areas, people living in urban areas can take better care of their family due to a more timely aid from hospital, a more convenient transportation, and a better living environment.

超级无敌小鹤鹤

。。。。批评批评！这次低级错误有点多哟~~~

婷婷connie

额，才想起来，之前的综合木有批==
小西下次要及时写作业哦，要不然没脑子的婷婷容易忘了
9.9 综合
TPO14
The topic the writer and the professor are(删掉,这一句有两个谓语啦) discussing is about the salvage logging. The writer treats it as positive both for the forest itself and for the economy, while the professor casts doubt on it based on the long term view.

Firstly, the writer considers the salvage logging as beneficial owing to（不应该是own sth to...吗？直接用owe to吗？这个婷婷不确定诶） the extra space for the growth of the new trees. The professor, however, takes an opposite note since it is not a well condition for the new trees to grow. After the dead trees are moved, the new generation cannot absorb the nutrition from soil provided by dead trees.（听力中有一个关键词，建议涌进去哦decompose）

Secondly, the writer illustrates that the dead trees offers a great living condition for the insects which will harm the newly born trees. On the contrary, the professor opposes that not all the insects are bad. Besides, the dead trees will not rot within 100 years(貌似没有这一点，听力里是说spruce beetle和spruce共生了近100 年没有造成危害)and thus will not provide a suitable living condition for the insects. Even in the long term, such harmful insects can perfectly feed up the birds living in the forest.
这一点的细节小西要再听一下~~
Last but not least, the writer applauds that the salvage logging can provide both the dead trees to the companies for their production and the additional jobs for the local residents. Nonetheless, the professor maintains that such benefit will not last long, not only for the damaged material but also for the outsider being the beneficiary instead of the local residents.（漏了一点,devices are expensive to maintain such as helicopter）

Conclusion:感觉这篇小西木有听好额，有两个点都没抓到。文字不错，重点练听力吧！！

gre呀gre

9.11 综合

The writer states three problems the archaeology-dedicate are facingin United Kingdom while the professor gives three solutions owing to theimproving condition for archaeology.

Firstly, the writer thinks it is a pity to lose many valuableartifacts during the construction proceeding. The professor, however, takes anopposite note since the construction must be examed before they got destroyed.If the scientists examined them as valuable, the scientists must make up a planto remove the constructions to some other place around them.

Secondly, the writer complains that the financial support fromgovernment was limited. On the contrary, the professor applaud to the companiesthat undergo the project that the archaeologists are paidful when they areworking. Such plan is raised by government, which can be a new resource tosupport the development of archaeology.

Last but not the least, the writer worries about the career inarchaelogy, which is offered only by universities and government. In contrast,the professor states that the experts major in archaeology are in a new stage.Thanks to the companies, they create so many jobs such as examing theconstruction before they got destroyed, researching, and processing. Suchbehavior helps the amout of the archaeologists' job become the highest in theBritish history.

瓜瓜不瓜

The writer states three problems the archaeology-dedicate (这个词为什么要出现在这里。。无情地删去！)are facingin United Kingdom while the professor gives three solutions （教授提出的不是solution，而是反驳文章观点）owing to theimproving condition for archaeology.

Firstly, the writer thinks it is a pity to lose many valuableartifacts during the construction proceeding（小西，文章表达的不是pity，而是存在的问题）. The professor, however, takes an opposite note since the construction must be examed before they got destroyed.If the scientists examined them as valuable, the scientists must make up a planto remove the constructions to some other place around them.（后面的支持的点是对的）

Secondly, the writer complains（建议用blame来改写一下这句话） that the financial support fromgovernment was limited. On the contrary, the professor applaud to the companies that undergo the project that the archaeologists are paidful （paid）when they are working. Such plan is raised by government, which can be a new resource to support the development of archaeology.

Last but not the least, the writer worries about （文章不是担心，文章是指出考古难的原因 ）the career inarchaelogy, which is offered only by universities and government. In contrast,the professor states that the experts major in archaeology are in a new stage.Thanks to the companies, they create so many jobs such as examing theconstruction before they got destroyed, researching, and processing. Suchbehavior helps the amout（amount） of the archaeologists' job become the highest in theBritish history.

小西在文章阅读的时候对文章的理解好像有偏差，文章是说了英国考古难的原因，然后教授说new guidelines让情况好了很多。建议再去重新看一下题目。
加油加油！

gre呀gre

9.12 综合

Both the writer and the professor are discussing the number of birds. The writer lists three reasons that will lead the amount of bird decreasing while the professor treats them as unconvincing.

To begin with, the writer complains that birds' natural babitats will go on to lose owing to the increasing population. The professor, however, opposites that that some types may shrink but other kinds of birds will increasing since the urban produces some places for the birds to grow, such as the land for the seagos and the streets for pigeons and even the holks can be seen in cities. As a result, the increasing number of birds has been a big problem among cities.

In addition, the writer worries about the habitat in rural areas due to the rising demand for agriculture. On the contrary, the professor argues that less lands has been used for the reason that there is a new crop that can produce more food per unit land. Besides, the woodness land cannot be used to produce food after it has been destroyed.

What is more, the writer states that the abuse of chemical pesticides used to kill pests will prevent birds reproducing and even kill them by polluting water and food chain. In contrast, the professor takes an opposite note that people are more aware of pesticides and two changes exits, a new chemical pesticide with less chemical remain and the new crop resiting pests genetically which will do no harm to birds without chemical pesticide.

婷婷connie

9.12 综合

Both the writer and the professor are discussing the number of birds. The writer lists three reasons that will lead the amount of bird decreasing while the professor treats them as unconvincing.

To begin with, the writer complains that birds' natural babitats(habitats) will go on to lose owing to the increasing population. The professor, however, opposites that that some types may shrink but other kinds of birds will increasing(increase) since the urban produces some places for the birds to grow, such as the land for the seagos(sea gulls这玩意儿叫海鸥= =)and the streets for pigeons and even the holks（hawks这个是老鹰） can be seen in cities. As a result, the increasing number of birds has been a big problem(听力只是说了increase这个现象，没有说是problem哇) among cities.

In addition, the writer worries about the habitat in rural areas due to the rising demand for agriculture. On the contrary, the professor argues that less lands has been used for the reason that there is a new crop that can produce more food per unit land. Besides, the woodness land cannot be used to produce food after it has been destroyed.

What is more, the writer states that the abuse of chemical pesticides used to kill pests will prevent birds reproducing and even kill them by polluting water and food chain. In contrast, the professor takes an opposite note that people are more aware of pesticides and two changes exits（exist）, a new chemical pesticide with less chemical remain and the new crop resiting（resisting） pests genetically which will do no harm to birds without chemical pesticide(这句词不达意了感觉像是which will harm birds with chemical pesticide,应该强调是the poisonous substance does no harm to birds).



Conclusion:小西有很多错别字了，一定要改，想exit,resite这样的意思都会改变的，一定要注意，还有就是最后一点有稍微出入

gre呀gre

9.13 独立

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Colleges or Universities should offer more courses to prepare students for the future before they start working.

Have you ever lost the direction that which kind of job should take? Have you ever been impolite to others but had no idea about it? Have you ever felt frustrated because of not figuring out the solution? If you have never experienced such situations, never will you understand the importance of the courses before starting working. Hence, I hold the view that the courses offered by universities to the students before they start working is important.

First and foremost, there is no doubt that nothing is more important than the career direction. Despite the significance of hard working, a fitable and clear direction can make everyone feel energetic and help to save time and money. To take myself as an example, I used to get an intership about the statistics analysis for my company but I could not do it well even stayed up all night. Thanks to the courses, the professor helped me to find the right direction and I was more suitable for marketing. After that, I applied a marketing job for Standard Chartered Bank and got their offer at the end.

In addition, I cannot emphysize the importance of the occupational manners too much, especially for the group of people that are the new comers to the occupation. Professional and skillful as a person is, he cannot ignore the basic manners. Right the courses offer such trainning, such as never wearing open-toed shoes in formal occasions, never running, more polite for women to wear skirts and some other manners, which will not be taught in the students’ daily classes. If a person performs appropriate, he will win at the first sight and thus will leave a better first impression.

What is more, the courses will act like a bridge between the knowledge students have learned in universities and the experience they should apply in their daily work. Statistics from the magazine Vista show that over 70 percen of the surveyed companies in my city complain that they question the ability of the graduates since they cannot transfer their knowledge as the real profit. Right such courses before working can make up the gap.

In a nutshell, considering someone’s complain that the course will occupy too much in the students’ schedule, you will find that they may fail to point out the final consequence that each students has to face the problem of finding a job and it deserves for them to pay more attention on such courses. To draw a conclusion, I maintain that the preparation courses before working provided by universities are important due to a clearer direction, more polite behaviors, and a bridge between the knowledge and experience in working.

33min 又慢了好吧呀