ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: 199249712
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请原谅我哪些钻牛角尖的题目。。T,T 感激。。

[复制链接]
51#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-4-23 21:45:36 | 只看该作者
艾玛今天就各种上课 晚上总结了十道逻辑题。。。
白天看了一篇1700的文章。。。 我要逃课。。。
52#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-4-24 18:40:02 | 只看该作者
转自ecomics

Decision making in cricket        In the blink of an eye  IT IS described by those who witnessed it as the greatest over ever bowled: Michael Holding, taking the new ball for the West Indies in the 1981 Test against England at the Kensington Oval in Barbados. They called him “whispering death”. His run-up, which started close to the sight-screen, was so graceful, the feet so light upon the turf, that it was said that the umpires couldn’t hear him approach. The action was beautifully languid, so that he appeared to put in no effort into the delivery. And yet the ball would whistle past the batsman’s nose at unplayable speed. At a time when the West Indies had a quartet of fast bowlers considered to be the most fearsome the world had ever seen, Mr Holding was perhaps the slipperiest.
That day he was at his terrifying peak. Geoffrey Boycott, the unfortunate batsman at the other end, said it was the fastest over he had ever faced. And he was no yellow youth. He was one of England’s greatest-ever batsman, with a wonderful eye and an unflappable temperament. Yet for those six balls he played as if he were a blind man swatting at swifts. They say of a sniper’s bullet that it if you hear it, then you are safe, because it will already have passed safely by. It is the ones that you don’t hear that do for you. In that over, five balls screeched past Mr Boycott’s flailing bat. The sixth made a horrible mess of his stumps.
For the mortals in the stands, it is perhaps the greatest mystery in the game: how can top batsmen play fast bowling? That day Mr Holding was clearly too good for Mr Boycott. But in the next Test, at the Antigua Recreation Ground, he scored a century against the same bowling attack.
The generally-accepted definition of a fast bowler is one who bowls consistently at over 90 miles (145 km) per hour. A cricket pitch is just 22 yards (20 metres) long. That gives batsmen around half a second to pick up the trajectory of the ball, decide which shot to play, and then to execute it. As if that were not hard enough, the best bowlers not only get the ball to swing laterally through the air, but also to deviate off the pitch. In that time the batsman must make up his mind whether to defend the ball, attack it, leave it to pass the stumps or, if it is aimed at his chin, take evasive action.
When playing a cross-batted shot, such as a pull or a cut, the timing needed to connect with the ball seems impossible. According to a study in Nature Neuroscience, “the batsman must judge the vertical position of the ball to within 3cm (limited by the bat's width) and its time of arrival to within 3 milliseconds (limited by the time the ball takes to pass the effective percussion zone of the bat).”
So what sets such batsmen apart? It is tempting to assume that they simply have better visual reaction times than the rest of us and can pick the ball up quicker. But according to “Wait”, a new book by Frank Partnoy, that is not the case. The book is about general decision-making in life, but contains a chapter on “super-fast sports”. It concludes that the best batsmen are no faster at “seeing” than their less successful colleagues, or even many amateurs. Whether you are Virender Sehwag or a village-green clubber, it will take you around 200 milliseconds to react to the ball. The best batsmen are set apart by what happens in the next 200 milliseconds, which the book calls the preparation stage. This means deciding on the shot, moving into the correct position and swinging the bat. (The third stage, hitting the ball, accounts for the last 100 milliseconds.) And here the margin between us and them is miniscule: “A cricket batsman who is just fifty milliseconds slower than an average professional—in other words, someone who is slower by just a fraction of the time it takes to blink—simply has no chance of competing with the pros.” Quoting Peter McLeod, an Oxford professor, the book goes on: “Their skill, it seems, lies in how they use the information to control motor actions once they have picked it up, not in the more elementary process of picking it up.”
This cannot be done consciously, because conscious contemplation takes at least half a second, by which time your stumps may have been uprooted. Few sports can match cricket's need for super-fast, unconscious reaction. Baseball is one; tennis—particularly returning serve—is another. The fastest reaction times of all, claims Mr Partnoy, are needed in fencing. To score an épée, he claims, you must beat your opponent to the hit by just 40 milliseconds. By comparison, players in football, American football and basketball have an eternity to weigh their options.
Now a commentator, Mr Boycott is often asked his advice on how to play fast bowling. He has a simple mantra: watch the ball and play it as late as possible. Of course, he never thought about the mechanics of what it means to judge a stroke to within the time it takes to blink an eye. To him, as with all great players, it was mere instinct (honed, naturally, by dedicated training). For the rest of us mortals, perhaps the only consolation is that we have always been just 50 milliseconds away from greatness.

表示郁闷 我为什么要摘这篇- -、、、
53#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-4-24 18:40:29 | 只看该作者
Facebook's flotation        Revision time  

ANYONE who thought that Facebook would run out of steam ahead of its initial public offering (IPO), which is expected to take place next month, should think again. On April 23rd the company revealed in a revised pre-IPO filing that it now boasts some 901m monthly active users, up from 845m in December 2011. If it continues to grow at this rate, the social-networking behemoth could soon boast one billion users, or around one in seven people on the planet.
But can Facebook translate this momentum into steadily growing profits against the backdrop of a volatile world economy and a growing battle over software patents that is roiling the tech industry? The social network is already locked in a fierce legal tussle with Yahoo!, which has accused it of violating a number of patents it holds in areas such as privacy controls and online advertising. And chances are that Facebook will be hit with more such lawsuits in future as its success makes it a tempting target.
This explains why the company has decided to fork out $550m on 650 patents held by Microsoft, which owns a small stake in Facebook. The social network will add these to the 750 patents that it snapped up from IBM for an undisclosed amount in March. The latest deal will enable Microsoft to recoup some of the $1.1 billion that it handed over to AOL earlier this month for a treasure trove of patents and patent applications, whilst retaining the rights to use the ones that most interest it. (Some commentators also see this as strengthening Microsoft and Facebook's united front against competitors such as Google.)
Experts think similar coalitions between tech firms will become more common in future because by working together they can afford to buy larger portfolios of patents and also compete more effectively against what is known as “patent trolls”, outfits that specialise in acquiring patents to make money from them purely through licensing or litigation in the courts. Frank Azzopardi of Davis Polk & Wardwell, a law firm, says the amount of collaboration around patent purchases has reached unprecedented levels. Earlier this year, for instance, another coalition led by Microsoft and Apple received a green light from American anti-trust regulators to buy a big portfolio of patents from Nortel Networks, a Canadian firm.
As well as strengthening Facebook's patent portfolio, its bosses must also demonstrate that they can keep its revenues and profits heading in the right direction. In the first quarter of this year, the company clocked up just over $1 billion of revenue, a 45% increase over the same period of 2011. But some analysts had been hoping for more.  In its regulatory filing the company said that average revenue per user had fallen 12% compared with the fourth quarter of the previous year, but said that it was common to see sales dip after a busy holiday season.
True, but Facebook recently spent a cool billion dollars in cash and stock on Instagram, a photo-sharing service. And potential investors will want reassurance that it can make handsome returns on their money. For now, the company seems set on investing heavily: its net income fell nearly a third from the fourth quarter of 2011 to $205m in the first three months of this year as expenses soared to $677m from $343 million a year earlier. Pouring money into new data centres, new hires and other areas makes sense ahead of a flotation. But once Facebook has gone public, its new investors may well expect it to pile up profits as well as patents.
54#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-4-24 18:40:44 | 只看该作者
来写一下今天的完成的任务
早上阅读小分队  下午看逻辑大全 做了40道 背单词 总结OGcr 10道。。
然后就这个点了。。。

9点半了。。。GWD数学+语文
12点54.。刷到OG85题。不困但看不进去了。。。
背会单词睡咯。。喵喵喵
55#
发表于 2012-4-25 06:27:20 | 只看该作者
上邪加油~~
56#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-4-25 08:39:59 | 只看该作者
谢谢姐姐~~~
57#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-4-25 16:01:50 | 只看该作者
来写一下。。。被CR大全完虐 早上一个小时+ 下午2点到4点 都在做大全 才做了一套20道。。 错了一半 查了查讨论帖 很多答案不太认同。。。搁置了。 艾玛艾玛艾玛 CR啊。。救命啊。。。
19:38  总结Prep20道+吃饭。。。
21:39.。。。总结了倒一倒二两篇RC (*……(……)(&……%¥*&%&*(……(*……* 今天效率好低 做个小分队的速度就可以回寝室了
21:54 两个速度阅读加记录。。。。啊我饿了!!!
23:35 总结1篇阅读
12:22 总结CR5道。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。困。。晚安咯
58#
发表于 2012-4-26 03:18:39 | 只看该作者
上邪很棒啊,加油~~~~
其实小分队的速度练习不要求写回忆的,你算是超额完成任务
不过可以省些时间。你就读完自己在脑子里回想下大意就好,不用写出来。
59#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-4-26 08:22:50 | 只看该作者
上邪很棒啊,加油~~~~
其实小分队的速度练习不要求写回忆的,你算是超额完成任务
不过可以省些时间。你就读完自己在脑子里回想下大意就好,不用写出来。
-- by 会员 babybearmm (2012/4/26 3:18:39)


啊~~~ 恩 下次不写了~~~
60#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-4-26 09:43:13 | 只看该作者
9:43 一直在做小分队 挑挑拣拣的做了一些 上课去
15:18 一套GWD
16:41 总结改错完毕。。。T.T 猫了个咪。。为什么总错以前没错过的 还是没学扎实啊。。。
17:40.。看了会SC。。。看了会VB
21;16....终于总结完了今天的CR、。。。缺氧啊!!!!!!
21:55 总结了一篇阅读 整理了今天的生词 没来得及背。。。。。。。。。。。。今天又没完成任务。。。数学还没做吖啊 啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊
大爷要来了 大爷都认识我了 大爷每次见我都说。。肿么又是你。。。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-26 22:29
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部