【每日逻辑练习第二季】【1-5】

fox0923

5. background information:For years the beautiful Renaissance buildings in Palitito have been damaged by exhaust from the many tour buses that come to the city. There has been little parking space, so most buses have idled at the curb during each stop on their tour, and idling produces as much exhaust as driving.

premise:The city has now provided parking that accommodates a third of the tour buses

conclusion:damage to Palitito's buildings from the buses' exhaust will diminish significantly.

平均总有三分之一的buses需要停车，三分之二在路上~

(A) The exhaust from Palitito's few automobiles is not a significant threat to Palitito's buildings.

--irrelevant
(B) Palitito's Renaissance buildings are not threatened by pollution other than engine exhaust.

--the conclusion is about the damage from the buses' exhaust--irrelevant

(C) Tour buses typically spend less than one-quarter of the time they are in Palitito transporting passengers from one site to another.

--3/4>1/3--weaken--right???
(D) More tourists come to Palitito by tour bus than by any other single means of transportation.

--irrelevant
(E) Some of the tour buses that are unable to find parking drive around Palitito while their passengers are visiting a site.

--how does the drivers react is irrelevant--idling or driving ,they are the same--irrelevant

感觉C是相反的~不过别的都不对，只有C和预测的相关~可是究竟哪里想错了？？？

求指教——

熊熊，这道题目你怎么考虑是相反的呢？我没太明白，不过说说我的看法先吧~~
There has been little parking space, so most buses have idled at the curb during each stop on their tour, and idling produces as much exhaust as driving. 这个背景信息代表了buses因为没有足够的parking，所以才会经常停在他们tour的每个站点上。
后来new plan就是提供parking给1/3的buses，结论是可以减少这种拥堵的现象。
C选项说buses在接送旅客从一个site到另一个site上花费的时间变少了，也就是说那个new plan起到了效果，这样拥堵的现象也就自然减少了。

fox0923

没牛推啊。。

-- by 会员 2598237905 (2011/11/25 8:44:13)

我表示不理解LS的话~~

zz42050524

2011/11/25 (1)
精炼1. Weaken Expect 45s
P: High tax will hamper the innovation of technology. Then the country will lose arm race. Through history, poor leadership of such destine result in losing voice in world affairs.
C; To prevent this happen, the tax must not more than 30% of income.
Prephrase: The answer would be support or irrelative, that is high tax makes the country lose arm race.


(A) The top level of taxation must reach 45 percent  Weaken , the answer opposite the conclusion
before taxation begins to deter inventors and
industrialists from introducing new
technologies and industries.
(B) Making a great deal of money is an         Weaken, it means technological innovation is
insignificant factor in driving technological      not affected by tax.
innovation.
(C) Falling behind in the international arms race   Weaken.
does not necessarily lead to a strategically
less advantageous position.
(D) Those nations that lose influence in the world   Weaken.
community do not necessarily suffer from a
threat to their value system or way of life.
(E) Allowing one’s country to lose its             support , this is the answer.
technological edge, especially as concerns
weaponry, would be foolish rather than
merely a historical accident.

逻辑链 Evaluate the argument 45
2: Urban area has more sulfur than rural area and the plants in urban area grow more slowly. To see how much does the sulfur influent, classes grew plant separately in urban greenhouse and rural greenhouse both filtered sulfur.
C: The plant in urban grow more slowly.
Prephrase: Is there any other elements influent the experiment?
D is the answer.

3. support  40
P: Edge roads has no marks of the edge, making edge marks will help drivers. After XX made marks in YY valley,
C accident rate is slightly high.
Prephrase: When there were no marks, drives were more careful, but now they don’t.
Answer E; 不是小心而是原来不敢走现在走了。。。

4.assumption  50
P：Country G is self-sufficient grain and meat. The average consumption will rise to world average as per capita income increases. If the income continue rise,
C: G will import either grain or meat.
Prephrase: The demand of grain and meat are both continue increase.
E is the answer:

5. support 44
P： Old buildings are destroyed by exhausts, because the city has no parking and the buses idle as much as drive tour. The city set parking space
C:  Exhausts diminish significantly.
Pre: Buses no more idle.
选了C， E is attractive, but E can not reflect “significantly”.

xeyyxzty

5. background information:For years the beautiful Renaissance buildings in Palitito have been damaged by exhaust from the many tour buses that come to the city. There has been little parking space, so most buses have idled at the curb during each stop on their tour, and idling produces as much exhaust as driving.

premise:The city has now provided parking that accommodates a third of the tour buses

conclusion:damage to Palitito's buildings from the buses' exhaust will diminish significantly.

平均总有三分之一的buses需要停车，三分之二在路上~

(C) Tour buses typically spend less than one-quarter of the time they are in Palitito transporting passengers from one site to another.

--3/4>1/3--weaken--right???

感觉C是相反的~不过别的都不对，只有C和预测的相关~可是究竟哪里想错了？？？

求指教——

熊熊，这道题目你怎么考虑是相反的呢？我没太明白，不过说说我的看法先吧~~
There has been little parking space, so most buses have idled at the curb during each stop on their tour, and idling produces as much exhaust as driving. 这个背景信息代表了buses因为没有足够的parking，所以才会经常停在他们tour的每个站点上。
后来new plan就是提供parking给1/3的buses，结论是可以减少这种拥堵的现象。
C选项说buses在接送旅客从一个site到另一个site上花费的时间变少了，也就是说那个new plan起到了效果，这样拥堵的现象也就自然减少了。

-- by 会员 fox0923 (2011/11/25 4:34:37)

为什么我觉得C是说buses用在XX城四分之一的时间接送旅客~那么剩余四分之三就要停车~而parking lot只够停三分之一~那么就还是有污染呀~
没说时间变少了吧~

风无衣

【精炼1-5】
1min8s
conclusion：the country must not allow its highest tax bracket to exceed 30% of the income if it wants to maintain its value and system.
high tax on income——a negative influence on technology——fall behind in international race——lose voice in world affairs.
find a choice that supports the argument or irrelevant.

(A) The top level of taxation must reach 45 percent
before taxation begins to deter inventors and
industrialists from introducing new
technologies and industries.——weaken
(B) Making a great deal of money is an
insignificant factor in driving technological
innovation.——weaken the first line of reasoning
(C) Falling behind in the international arms race
does not necessarily lead to a strategically
less advantageous position.——weaken the third line of reasoning
(D) Those nations that lose influence in the world
community do not necessarily suffer from a
threat to their value system or way of life.——weaken
(E) Allowing one’s country to lose its
technological edge, especially as concerns
weaponry, would be foolish rather than
merely a historical accident.

错选B。分析还是不到位。攻击的逻辑点木有找到~绕得脑袋都晕了~bible的题目都这么绕吗。。。
Answer choice (B): This answer attacks the first half of the first sentence, which
states that high taxes necessarily produce a negative incentive for technological
innovation. Because taxes lower an individual’s income, the higher the tax, the
greater the relative restriction on making money. Answer choice (B) shows that
higher taxes would not necessarily produce low innovation because innovators
do not care about the amount they earn.

Answer choice (E): This is the correct answer. The answer does not hurt the
argument because the stimulus specifically states that “Those nations that,
through historical accident or the foolishness of their political leadership, wind
up in a strategically disadvantageous position...” So, the actual reason the nation
ends up in a disadvantageous position is not critical. It could be either
foolishness or historical accident. So, an answer that asserts that it is foolishness
and not historical accident has no effect on the argument.

【逻辑链1-5】
2、evaluate_41s
background information:sulfur dioxide:city>rural
                                     plants growth:city<rural
premise:to figure out the influence of sulfur dioxide on plants growth,schools in city and rural grow plants in greenhouse without sulfur dioxide
conclusion:plants growth:city<rural
D

3、explain_31s
clear edge markings contribute to the road safety.
after GC painted edge markings on its narrow,winding roads,the annual accident rate increased.
solve the paradox(rate and number problem)
E

4、assumption_25s
Gortland self-sufficient in meat and grain.It takes several  pounds of grain to produce one pound of meat.
per capita income rise——per capita consumption in meat rise
premise:per capita income will continues to rise.
conclusion:Gortland have to import grain or meat or both
E

5、suppor_36s
tour bus damages to the building in P
there has little parking place,most buses have idled at the curb during each stop on their tour, and idling produces as much exhaust as driving
conclusion:damage will diminish significantly if the city provides parking place for tour bus.
C

风无衣

5. background information:For years the beautiful Renaissance buildings in Palitito have been damaged by exhaust from the many tour buses that come to the city.There has been little parking space, so most buses have idled at the curb during each stop on their tour, and idling produces as much exhaust as driving.

premise:The city has now provided parking that accommodates a third of the tour buses

conclusion:damage to Palitito's buildings from the buses' exhaust will diminish significantly.

平均总有三分之一的buses需要停车，三分之二在路上~

(C) Tour buses typically spend less than one-quarter of the time they are in Palitito transporting passengers from one site to another.

--3/4>1/3--weaken--right???

感觉C是相反的~不过别的都不对，只有C和预测的相关~可是究竟哪里想错了？？？

求指教——

熊熊，这道题目你怎么考虑是相反的呢？我没太明白，不过说说我的看法先吧~~
There has been little parking space, so most buses have idled at the curb during each stop on their tour, and idling produces as much exhaust as driving. 这个背景信息代表了buses因为没有足够的parking，所以才会经常停在他们tour的每个站点上。
后来new plan就是提供parking给1/3的buses，结论是可以减少这种拥堵的现象。
C选项说buses在接送旅客从一个site到另一个site上花费的时间变少了，也就是说那个new plan起到了效果，这样拥堵的现象也就自然减少了。

-- by 会员 fox0923 (2011/11/25 4:34:37)

为什么我觉得C是说buses用在XX城四分之一的时间接送旅客~那么剩余四分之三就要停车~而parking lot只够停三分之一~那么就还是有污染呀~
没说时间变少了吧~

-- by 会员 xeyyxzty (2011/11/25 12:56:48)

我默默的插个嘴~别介意哈~嘻嘻~刚好在我楼上我看到了~吼吼
我木有理解LZ为啥觉得C项是weaken~
我的理解是：C项说的是在P城里，tour bus基本上只用不到1/4的时间在载客~也就说说超过3/4的时间是idle的，这more than 3/4的时间中还是会产生大量废气~
结论是说：为1/3的tour bus提供停车的地方，能够significantly减少由废气对building产生的damage~
也就是说：有1/3 的tour bus在超过3/4的时间里它们将不再排放废气。这样废气的减少量是很多的~所以能够support结论~

P.S.我说的晕晕的~将就看看哈~嘻嘻~排除法也挺管用的~其他明显都不咋对~吼吼~

xeyyxzty

5. background information:For years the beautiful Renaissance buildings in Palitito have been damaged by exhaust from the many tour buses that come to the city.There has been little parking space, so most buses have idled at the curb during each stop on their tour, and idling produces as much exhaust as driving.

premise:The city has now provided parking that accommodates a third of the tour buses

conclusion:damage to Palitito's buildings from the buses' exhaust will diminish significantly.

平均总有三分之一的buses需要停车，三分之二在路上~

(C) Tour buses typically spend less than one-quarter of the time they are in Palitito transporting passengers from one site to another.

--3/4>1/3--weaken--right???

感觉C是相反的~不过别的都不对，只有C和预测的相关~可是究竟哪里想错了？？？

求指教——

熊熊，这道题目你怎么考虑是相反的呢？我没太明白，不过说说我的看法先吧~~
There has been little parking space, so most buses have idled at the curb during each stop on their tour, and idling produces as much exhaust as driving. 这个背景信息代表了buses因为没有足够的parking，所以才会经常停在他们tour的每个站点上。
后来new plan就是提供parking给1/3的buses，结论是可以减少这种拥堵的现象。
C选项说buses在接送旅客从一个site到另一个site上花费的时间变少了，也就是说那个new plan起到了效果，这样拥堵的现象也就自然减少了。

-- by 会员 fox0923 (2011/11/25 4:34:37)

为什么我觉得C是说buses用在XX城四分之一的时间接送旅客~那么剩余四分之三就要停车~而parking lot只够停三分之一~那么就还是有污染呀~
没说时间变少了吧~

-- by 会员 xeyyxzty (2011/11/25 12:56:48)

我默默的插个嘴~别介意哈~嘻嘻~刚好在我楼上我看到了~吼吼
我木有理解LZ为啥觉得C项是weaken~
我的理解是：C项说的是在P城里，tour bus基本上只用不到1/4的时间在载客~也就说说超过3/4的时间是idle的，这more than 3/4的时间中还是会产生大量废气~
结论是说：为1/3的tour bus提供停车的地方，能够significantly减少由废气对building产生的damage~
也就是说：有1/3 的tour bus在超过3/4的时间里它们将不再排放废气。这样废气的减少量是很多的~所以能够support结论~

P.S.我说的晕晕的~将就看看哈~嘻嘻~排除法也挺管用的~其他明显都不咋对~吼吼~

-- by 会员 风无衣 (2011/11/25 13:51:46)

这个我懂~就是觉得那个三分之一不够用~所以weaken了~忽略我吧
唉~我都不知道怎么想的~逻辑题一天一个感觉...
不过谢谢哦~

风无衣

5. background information:For years the beautiful Renaissance buildings in Palitito have been damaged by exhaust from the many tour buses that come to the city.There has been little parking space, so most buses have idled at the curb during each stop on their tour, and idling produces as much exhaust as driving.

premise:The city has now provided parking that accommodates a third of the tour buses

conclusion:damage to Palitito's buildings from the buses' exhaust will diminish significantly.

平均总有三分之一的buses需要停车，三分之二在路上~

(C) Tour buses typically spend less than one-quarter of the time they are in Palitito transporting passengers from one site to another.

--3/4>1/3--weaken--right???

感觉C是相反的~不过别的都不对，只有C和预测的相关~可是究竟哪里想错了？？？

求指教——

熊熊，这道题目你怎么考虑是相反的呢？我没太明白，不过说说我的看法先吧~~
There has been little parking space, so most buses have idled at the curb during each stop on their tour, and idling produces as much exhaust as driving. 这个背景信息代表了buses因为没有足够的parking，所以才会经常停在他们tour的每个站点上。
后来new plan就是提供parking给1/3的buses，结论是可以减少这种拥堵的现象。
C选项说buses在接送旅客从一个site到另一个site上花费的时间变少了，也就是说那个new plan起到了效果，这样拥堵的现象也就自然减少了。

-- by 会员 fox0923 (2011/11/25 4:34:37)

为什么我觉得C是说buses用在XX城四分之一的时间接送旅客~那么剩余四分之三就要停车~而parking lot只够停三分之一~那么就还是有污染呀~
没说时间变少了吧~

-- by 会员 xeyyxzty (2011/11/25 12:56:48)

我默默的插个嘴~别介意哈~嘻嘻~刚好在我楼上我看到了~吼吼
我木有理解LZ为啥觉得C项是weaken~
我的理解是：C项说的是在P城里，tour bus基本上只用不到1/4的时间在载客~也就说说超过3/4的时间是idle的，这more than 3/4的时间中还是会产生大量废气~
结论是说：为1/3的tour bus提供停车的地方，能够significantly减少由废气对building产生的damage~
也就是说：有1/3 的tour bus在超过3/4的时间里它们将不再排放废气。这样废气的减少量是很多的~所以能够support结论~

P.S.我说的晕晕的~将就看看哈~嘻嘻~排除法也挺管用的~其他明显都不咋对~吼吼~

-- by 会员 风无衣 (2011/11/25 13:51:46)

这个我懂~就是觉得那个三分之一不够用~所以weaken了~忽略我吧
唉~我都不知道怎么想的~逻辑题一天一个感觉...
不过谢谢哦~

-- by 会员 xeyyxzty (2011/11/25 15:45:45)

不客气不客气~(*^__^*) 嘻嘻……
我的CR还木有找到感觉。。。掩面泪奔啊~~~~~~~(>_<)~~~~
Bible上的题目俨然已经把我绕晕了~
我还是默默刷OG去吧~~

balapupu

昨天被语法讨论耽搁了，今天来补作业：1.【30s】【前提结论型】
P：urban area SD> rural area SD-->urban plant growth< rural plant growth-->the SD determine the plant growth.
    Experiment in two places in both school:green house both in urban and rural area delete the SD in them==>plant still grow slower in urban area.
    evaluate：whether the environment in the school is different from the environment outside.
A:
(A) The urban school was located in a part of the city in which levels of sulfur dioxide in the air were usually far lower than is typical for urban areas.-->the experiment already filter the SD, so there is no need to compare the SD level.
(B) At both schools, the plants in the greenhouses grew much more quickly than did plants planted outdoors in plots near the greenhouses.-->irrelevant comparison.
(C) The urban class conducting the experiment was larger than the rural class conducting the experiment.-->irrelevant with the class
(D) Heavy vehicular traffic such as is found in cities constantly deposits grime on greenhouse windows, reducing the amount of light that reaches the plants inside.-->R
(E) Because of the higher levels of sulfur dioxide in the air at the urban school, the air filters for the urban school's greenhouse were changed more frequently than were those at the rural school.-->irrelevant comparison.



2.[24s]
P:the printed marking can decrease the injury from the poor road condition-->however,since the C country pot the new printed marking -->the accident rate increase.
explain:because the new markings, more cars choose to drive on this road-->thus lead to the accident from traffic congestion.
A:
(A) Great water County has an unusually high proportion of narrow, winding roads.-->deepen the paradox.
(B) In bad weather it can be nearly as difficult for drivers to see the road as it is at night.-->can explain the marking is insufficient but can not explain why the marking increase the accident rate.
(C) Prior to the painting of the edge markings, Greatwater County's narrow, winding roads already had a somewhat higher accident rate than other Greatwater County roads.-->just fact can not explain the reason.
(D) Many of the accidents on narrow, winding roads involve a single vehicle veering off the road, rather than the collision of two vehicles.-->the kind of accident can not explain the reason that marking lead to the accident rate.
(E) After the markings were painted on the roads, many drivers who had gone out of their way to avoid driving on those roads at night no longer did so.-->can explain the rate.



19.这个做过啦~~~就是保证G不会减少谷物的摄取量。
20.【25s】【措施目的型】
P：building will damaged by the pollution from the car->there are little packing lot, thus cars have to remain idle when waiting for the tourist and pollute the building.
C:suggestion about build more packing lots will significant decrease the pollution and thus protect the environment.
support:
there will be no more pollution for the bus to go to the parking lot than just remain idle at he curb.
A:
(A) The exhaust from Palitito's few automobiles is not a significant threat to Palitito's buildings.-->pay attention do not conclude that automobile is not significant means that bus is significant
(B) Palitito's Renaissance buildings are not threatened by pollution other than engine exhaust.--> engine exhaust can from many resources
(C) Tour buses typically spend less than one-quarter of the time they are in Palitito transporting passengers from one site to another.-->highlight the significant role of idle pollution.R
(D) More tourists come to Palitito by tour bus than by any other single means of transportation.-->same to A
(E) Some of the tour buses that are unable to find parking drive around Palitito while their passengers are visiting a site.-->weaken

fox0923

5. background information:For years the beautiful Renaissance buildings in Palitito have been damaged by exhaust from the many tour buses that come to the city.There has been little parking space, so most buses have idled at the curb during each stop on their tour, and idling produces as much exhaust as driving.

premise:The city has now provided parking that accommodates a third of the tour buses

conclusion:damage to Palitito's buildings from the buses' exhaust will diminish significantly.

平均总有三分之一的buses需要停车，三分之二在路上~

(C) Tour buses typically spend less than one-quarter of the time they are in Palitito transporting passengers from one site to another.

--3/4>1/3--weaken--right???

感觉C是相反的~不过别的都不对，只有C和预测的相关~可是究竟哪里想错了？？？

求指教——

熊熊，这道题目你怎么考虑是相反的呢？我没太明白，不过说说我的看法先吧~~
There has been little parking space, so most buses have idled at the curb during each stop on their tour, and idling produces as much exhaust as driving. 这个背景信息代表了buses因为没有足够的parking，所以才会经常停在他们tour的每个站点上。
后来new plan就是提供parking给1/3的buses，结论是可以减少这种拥堵的现象。
C选项说buses在接送旅客从一个site到另一个site上花费的时间变少了，也就是说那个new plan起到了效果，这样拥堵的现象也就自然减少了。

-- by 会员 fox0923 (2011/11/25 4:34:37)

为什么我觉得C是说buses用在XX城四分之一的时间接送旅客~那么剩余四分之三就要停车~而parking lot只够停三分之一~那么就还是有污染呀~
没说时间变少了吧~

-- by 会员 xeyyxzty (2011/11/25 12:56:48)

我默默的插个嘴~别介意哈~嘻嘻~刚好在我楼上我看到了~吼吼
我木有理解LZ为啥觉得C项是weaken~
我的理解是：C项说的是在P城里，tour bus基本上只用不到1/4的时间在载客~也就说说超过3/4的时间是idle的，这more than 3/4的时间中还是会产生大量废气~
结论是说：为1/3的tour bus提供停车的地方，能够significantly减少由废气对building产生的damage~
也就是说：有1/3 的tour bus在超过3/4的时间里它们将不再排放废气。这样废气的减少量是很多的~所以能够support结论~

P.S.我说的晕晕的~将就看看哈~嘻嘻~排除法也挺管用的~其他明显都不咋对~吼吼~

-- by 会员 风无衣 (2011/11/25 13:51:46)

这个我懂~就是觉得那个三分之一不够用~所以weaken了~忽略我吧
唉~我都不知道怎么想的~逻辑题一天一个感觉...
不过谢谢哦~

-- by 会员 xeyyxzty (2011/11/25 15:45:45)

只要最后可以起到support的目的就可以了，1/3这个值够不够用不是我们应该考虑的，很多选项就是support一点，support更多的问题。只要可以改变一下现状目的就达到了，那么就算是support。