|
新手的新手，刚刚开始， 翻了一下档案，似乎没有人问OG1, 可是我就是有些不明白，请求帮助。
1. The Wallerstein study indicates that even after a decade young men and women still experience some of the effects of a divorce occurring when a child.
A. occurring when a child
B. occurring when children
C. that occurred when a child
D. that occurred when they were children
E. that has occurred as each was a child
Choice D is best. The phrasing a divorce that occurred when they were children correctly uses the relative clause that occurred to modify a divorce and includes a pronoun and verb (they were) that refer unambiguously to their antecedent, men and women. Choice A incorrectly introduces the when... phrase with occurring, thus illogically making divorce the grammatical referent of when a child; furthermore, the singular child does not agree with the plural men and women. B replaces child with children but otherwise fails to correct A's errors of structure and logic, and C corrects only the error created by occurring. Choice E includes an incorrect verb tense (has occurred) and wrongly replaces when with as. Also, each was does not properly refer to men and women.
不明白的是上面的有关A地解释。 为什么说把when用在occurring后面， divorce成了when a child的逻辑主语了呢？ 谢谢！ | 
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2004-6-23 11:06:00
楼主
