ChaseDream»Forum › GMAT考试 › 走出GMAT困境 › *携隐*小教室（以提高英语水平为最终目标！） ...

1 ... 10 11 12 131415 16 17 18 ... 210 / 210 页下一页

楼主: 携隐

携隐小教室（以提高英语水平为最终目标！）

[精华] [复制链接]

携隐

131^#

楼主| 发表于 2004-6-14 15:03:00 | 只看该作者

：）好的。

对了，忘了回答你，我的melodyin.com是个休闲BBS，大家有空上去灌灌水，发起一些FB活动，欢迎加入啊。

回复

同意！

看一下！

Mark一下！

tulipmontreal

132^#

发表于 2004-6-14 16:19:00 | 只看该作者

关于52和150 偶的理解关键还是把握句子的意思来判断

52 偶的理解是MISTAKE后面接rise of the moon不合习惯.不是说 rise of the moon不合习惯.

130-150的链接呢

回复

同意！

看一下！

Mark一下！

arundhati

133^#

发表于 2004-6-14 17:02:00 | 只看该作者

加油加油～

回复

同意！

看一下！

Mark一下！

携隐

134^#

楼主| 发表于 2004-6-14 19:44:00 | 只看该作者

收到！加油中……

回复

同意！

看一下！

Mark一下！

tulipmontreal

135^#

发表于 2004-6-14 21:00:00 | 只看该作者

+u

回复

同意！

看一下！

Mark一下！

费希

136^#

发表于 2004-6-14 22:33:00 | 只看该作者

好久没给携隐MM打气了，

加油！注意身体！

回复

同意！

看一下！

Mark一下！

vincent0330

137^#

发表于 2004-6-15 11:26:00 | 只看该作者

给在上班的mm打气.......

回复

同意！

看一下！

Mark一下！

携隐

138^#

楼主| 发表于 2004-6-15 22:32:00 | 只看该作者

你们对我好好哦！！！感动～～～

回复

同意！

看一下！

Mark一下！

luckykaren

139^#

发表于 2004-6-15 22:45:00 | 只看该作者

＋u

回复

同意！

看一下！

Mark一下！

My thoughts

OG

Ø And前后对称：escape…and kill，排除AB

Ø DE的them与前面的an…不对应，选C

Ø BE的with从句容易引起歧义：这些人没有能力反抗，另外一些人有能力反抗

Ø 本句需要平行对称might escape…and kill。正确答案C符合平行对称用了who从句来修饰humans，在who从句中用了合适的条件时态would have

Ø AB，引入独立从句it would kill…和it might kill…,打破了平行对称

Ø DE保持了平行对称,但使用了复数them,不能指代前面的单数名词microbe

Ø BDE缺少would来表示出条件的意思

考点：

Ø 平行对称:…and…

Ø 单复数之前后对应:them/microbe

Ø 逻辑关系:表达假设条件用would

携隐

140^#

楼主| 发表于 2004-6-16 00:48:00 | 只看该作者

第16单元:正确率70%

My thoughts

OG

Ø 条件从句（if）用一般现在时，排除ABE

Ø C的that is多余，of与and后成分不对称，选D

Ø A的eating of与and后的excelling不对应

Ø E的have been“一度是…”，与原文意思不符

Ø 正确答案D在四个方面正确：1 if从句要用一般现在时，以与主句的is对应；2 使用正确的固定搭配connection between x and y；3 and前后成分对称（eating…and excelling…）；4 形容词apparent要放在其它的headnoun （connection）前面

Ø ABE条件从句时态错误

Ø AB用了不正确的固定搭配connection of x and y

Ø AC的and前后不对称（eating of…and excelling…）

Ø CE将apparent放在了connection后面，错

考点：

Ø 固定搭配：connection between x and y

Ø 条件从句用一般现在时

Ø 平行对称：…and…

Ø 形容词最好放在其修饰对象的前面

谢谢karen!!!!!

贴第16单元先,其他的后补.

151.

D, the best choice, deals successfully with four issues. It uses a present indicative verb form in the conditional clause. If Dr. Wade is right, in order to agree with the verb in the main clause, any connection is...coincidental. It uses the idiomatic phrasing connection between x and y. It presents the coordinate objects of the preposition between (eating ... and excelling ...) in parallel form. Finally, the adjective apparent appears in front of its headnoun connection, not after. A, B, and E use incorrect verb forms in the conditional clause. A and B use the unidiomatic connection of x and y. A and C violate parallelism with eating of. C and E incorrectly place apparent after its headword connection.

152.

This sentence requires parallel verb forms within the relative clause that might escape... and kill. C, the best choice, uses parallel verb forms that are followed appropriately by the conditional would have in the who clause that modifies humans. Choices A and B each violate parallel construction by introducing a new independent clause, it would kill... and it might kill... Though choices D and E begin by observing parallelism, the use of them at the end of each creates a problem of pronoun reference: them cannot refer to the singular microbe. In addition, choices B, D, and E lack would and thus do not express the conditional.

153.

My thoughts

OG

Ø So…that句型,划线部分解释的是so…,要用that来带出下一部分,排除BCD

Ø E的结构别扭,选A

Ø Cecret不能用来修饰动词installed and operated

Ø B:名词(installation and operation)不如动词

Ø 正确答案A将recording system作为强调重心:将其作为句子的主语,并从逻辑上成为句末it的指代对象

Ø B将installation and operation作为主语,转移了句子的强调重心,并使it失去指代对象

Ø Cawkward,且使用了一个confusing delayed的主语结构,同时,C缺少连词that来带出下一部分

Ø D是一个长名词短语,缺少谓语动词,无法组成完整的句子

Ø E改变了主谓位置,使主句无法从逻辑上与下一部分相接

考点：

Ø 逻辑关系:改变句子强调重心(改变句子主语)

Ø 逻辑关系:缺少谓语或颠倒主谓位置,使句子断裂不完整

A, the best choice, correctly focuses upon the recording system by making it the straightforward subject of the sentence and the logical referent of the pronoun it in the last line. B makes installation and operation the subject, distorting the focus and leaving it without a clear referent. C distorts the focus with an awkward and confusing delayed subject construction. C also omits the conjunction that necessary to introduce the clause stating the result (even Sorenson did not know . . .). D, a long noun phrase with no finite verb, produces a fragment rather than a complete sentence. E awkwardly inverts the order of the subject and predicate in the main clause and thus cannot be logically connected to the remainder of the sentence.

154.

My thoughts

OG

Ø Consider x y,而不是as y,排除BCE

Ø 划线部分是对前面部分的解释而不是并列的动作,用ing而不用and,选A

Ø BD: more than the 500 slaves,特指比他的500人更多的人,不符合原文意思

Ø C:去掉了the,没有表明这些slaves是他的,改变原文意思

Ø B少了who were,表达不够清楚

Ø 句子需要一个分词短语setting free…来连接动名词结构by filing a deed…,因为有了the filing of a deed才使setting free…成为可能.

Ø BD的more than the 500 slaves表示他释放的不是他自己的奴隶,改变了原文意思

Ø CD使用了stunned与set free的平行结构,表明这是两个分离的没有关系的动作,改变了原文意思

Ø E使用了第二个独立的从句,虽然从语法上是对的,但是也改变了原文的意思(没有表达出原文的因果关系)

Ø BCE的considered as是unidomatic的

考点：

Ø 逻辑关系:没有表达出句子的因果关系(通常用…,-ing…来表达,…and…表达的是两个并列的动作,无法表达因果关系)

Ø 逻辑关系:改变原文意思:the改变位置

Ø 固定搭配:consider x y

This sentence requires that the participial phrase setting free... connect to the gerund construction by filing a deed...; it was the filing of a deed that made possible the setting free .... Choices A and B establish this connection, but only A, the best choice, completes the participial phrase appropriately. In choices B and D the misconstructed phrases set[ting] free more than the 500 slaves ... mistakenly suggest that Carter set free slaves that were not his own. Choices C and D distort meaning by paralleling stunned and set free, as though these were two separate and independent actions. E begins a second independent clause, which--though grammatically acceptable--again distorts the meaning. In choices B, C, and E, considered as is unidiomatic.

155

My thoughts

OG

Ø Find sb. Adj. to do或者find that…,排除DA的are和B的to be

Ø And 前后对应,排除C,选E

Ø The 特指,而这里是泛指,排除A

Ø 句子需要三个平行对称的部分来完成一个正确的宾语从句: local witnesses are (1) difficult..., (2) reticent, and (3) suspicious...这三个部分无论从形式上还是逻辑上都必须对称--都必须是形容词或形容词短语,只有C做到了

Ø AB将第三个成分变成了宾语从句的第二个谓语(重复了are)

Ø DE将第三个成分变成了第二个并列的宾语从句(用了they are)

Ø ABD缺少连词that来连接直接宾语从句

错误点：

没有分析清楚三个并列的成分的形式和相互的关系

考点：

Ø 平行对称:…,…and…(形式和逻辑都要对称)

Ø 句子结构:缺少连词that来引出直接宾语

This sentence requires parallelism in the three coordinate complements that form the direct object clause: local witnesses are (1) difficult..., (2) reticent, and (3) suspicious... These three elements are logically parallel and must be formally parallel as well. Each must be expressed in an adjective or adjective phrase. C, the best choice, does this clearly and correctly. A, B, D, and E violate the parallelism in one of two ways. A and B convert the third element into a second, coordinate predicate for the object clause by repeating the verb are. D and E convert the third element into a second, coordinate object clause by introducing the words they are. Moreover, A, B, and D lack the conjunction that needed to introduce the direct object clause.

156.

My thoughts

OG

Ø As much as,比较对象对等,前面是cost(verb),后面要补出谓语动词do

Ø B中maintain的主语变成了rose,选C

Ø 句子比较了maintain两种道路的costs.只有B保持了比较对象的平行对称

Ø A将dirt roads和maintaining paved roads作比较

Ø C将maintaining dirt roads和paved roads本身的成本做比较

Ø D引入从句it does for,更破坏了平行对称,且it没有清晰的指代对象

Ø E的to maintain和for…不对称

错误点：

没有分析清楚两个被比较对象的形式和含义(C中说的不是maintain的成本而是paved roads本身的成本)

考点：

Ø 比较:比较对象对称

Ø 指代:it指代不清

This sentence compares the costs required to maintain two kinds of roads. B, the best choice, is able to maintain parallelism in the comparison as well. Choice A incorrectly shifts the meaning by comparing the cost of dirt roads with the cost of maintaining paved roads. Choice C does the opposite: it compares the cost of maintaining dirt roads with the cost of paved roads themselves. Choice D further confuses the sentence by adding a nonparallel clause, it does for, in which it has no clear referent. Choice E introduces the infinitive phrase to maintain... and wrongly attempts to complete the comparison with the nonparallel prepositional phrase for....

157.

My thoughts

OG

Ø Contend that…,排除CDE

Ø 强调的是all of the thousands…,不是five billion people,选A

Ø B强调重心发生变化,且of which can be…容易引起歧义.all是用来修饰languages的,指所有的语言,而不是修饰can的

Ø CD:动词优于形容词(traceable)

Ø D: contend…to be错

Ø E:谁的ability? that are多余; trace与back隔的太远

Ø 正确答案A(1)contend后用that引出名词从句;(2)all of the thousands of languages作为宾语从句的主语,清楚地表达了contend的内容;(3)清楚的表达了thousands of languages与common root language的关系(可以被traced back to)

Ø BC将people作为主语,转移了句子重心

Ø B的of which all不惯用(习惯用法为all of which)

Ø C: traceable back to罗嗦,不直接

Ø D: contend要跟that不跟不定式

Ø E:用了一个名词短语,使句子不连贯,不合语法

考点：

Ø 固定搭配:contend that…(不跟不定式,不直接跟名词如contend the ability…)

Ø 习惯用法:all of which (不是of which all)

Ø 逻辑关系:改变句子重心(改变主语)

Ø 优于定律:动词优于形容词(trace优于traceable)

A, the best choice, correctly (1) uses a noun clause introduced by that after contend, (2) keeps the "contention" clear by making all of the thousands of languages the subject of the noun clause, and (3) precisely indicates the relationship of the thousands of languages to the common root language (they can be traced back to it). B and C produce convoluted and ill-focused sentences by making the world's five billion people the subject of the noun clause. The phrase of which all in B is unidiomatic (all of which is the idiom). C uses the wordy and indirect traceable back to. D incorrectly substitutes an infinitive clause for the "that" noun clause required after contend. E, in substituting a noun phrase, becomes incoherent and ungrammatical

158.

My thoughts

OG

Ø 主语是citizens,状语从句谓语用with/as/having都不对,排除ABD

Ø C的being多余,选E

Ø 句子开头的词或短语必须在美国的人口量和它的citizens的activities之间建立对比关系,DE都建立了对比关系,只有E用Although表达了正确的意思

Ø A的with和D的despite having表达了美国公民”拥有”而不是”组成了”人口的5%的意思

Ø BC的开始句和主句之间没有对比关系

Ø B的as是unidiomatic的

考点：

Ø 固定搭配:contend that…(不跟不定式,不直接跟名词如contend the ability…)

Ø 习惯用法:all of which (不是of which all)

Ø 逻辑关系:改变句子重心(改变主语)

Ø 优于定律:动词优于形容词(trace优于traceable)

The word or phrase that begins this sentence should establish the contrast between the size of the United States population and the activities of its citizens. Choices D and E are the only ones that establish the contrast, and only E, the best choice, expresses meaning accurately with the phrase Although accounting for. With in choice A and Despite having in choice D confusingly suggest that United States citizens somehow possess, rather than constitute, 5 percent of the world's population. Choices B and C lose the contrast between the opening phrase and the main clause, and As is unidiomatic in B.

159.

My thoughts

OG

Ø DE的it单复数不符

Ø B的their指代不清,选A

Ø 正确答案A清晰简洁,they和property values单复数对应,whose清楚地指代homeowners,同时,用lost equity的概念将两部分联系起来

Ø BCD用了in that their, because their来代替whose是罗嗦的,且their可能指代they而不是homeowners

Ø BE的can potentially语意重复

Ø DE的单数it跟values单复数不符

考点：

Ø 单复数之前后对应:it/values

Ø 简洁:in that their/because their罗嗦

Ø 指代:their指代不清

Ø 语意重复:can potentially

Choice A is the best. Its wording is unambiguous and economical. The plural pronoun they agrees with its antecedent, property values. The pronoun whose clearly refers to homeowners and efficiently connects them with the idea of lost equity. In B, C, and D, substituting in that their or because their for whose is wordy and confusing since the antecedent of their might be they, not homeowners. Furthermore, can potentially is redundant in B and E. Both D and E use the singular pronoun it, which does not agree with its logical antecedent, property values.

160.

My thoughts

OG

Ø …,…and…,三个部分要平行对称,排除B(by suggesting/call)和DE(suggest/calling)

Ø To decrease优于for decreasing,选A

Ø 正确答案E使用了平行结构: some propose', others suggest. . . , and still others are calling ....

Ø AB不平行对称且用by suggesting和by calling造成句子断裂

Ø B用了call,与by suggesting不平行对称

Ø C: for decreasing不惯用,不便于理解

Ø D将第三部分变成了by calling,没有与前面平行

错误点：

没有分析清楚三个平行对称的成分

考点：

Ø 平行对称:…,…and …

Ø 动词优于动名词,decrease优于for decreasing

Choice E, the best answer, uses constructions that are parallel to some propose', others suggest. . . , and still others are calling .... Choices A and B immediately lose the parallel construction, and also produce sentence fragments, by shifting to by suggesting ... and by calling .... Choice B starts like choice A and then shifts back to the verb call, losing the parallel with the second part (by suggesting). Choices C and D correctly begin the second part of the parallel by using suggest. Choice C, however, introduces the nonidiomatic for decreasing, which creates some difficulty in meaning. Choice D loses parallel construction in the third part by shifting to by calling.

本单元总结：

三个错题都错在平行对称,看来找…,…and…的复杂平行对称的对称部分是我的弱项.

[此贴子已经被作者于2004-6-16 15:56:12编辑过]