In the lecture, the professor raises several counterarguments against the reading passage by providing drastically different evidences regarding the problem of smoking ban, especially on the aspects of health、economics and personal rights. The first point that the professor made to cast doubt on the reading passage is that in stead of what stated in the reading, smokers still can smoke as long as they feel like doing so, but be sure not to harm others. People, especially non-smokers, tend to have clean air and good living conditions. Then the professor made another point that although some restraunts and bars may have to face bankrupty if smoking are banned, just as the reading indicates, on the other hand, the non-smokers will appear in this kind of places and more bars will be built up. In fact, it is more appealing to the owners and it is a tremendous market. Finally, the professor stated that, on the contrary of the reading passage, smoking can generate a considerable number of cancers and disease. Such as lung cancer、heart disease and other kinds of body damages. However, the reading just mentioned few about this fact. In summary, the points made in the lecture explicitly contradict what the reading passage indicates. 这是KAPLAN TEST2的综合写作部分,我用了大概14分钟写完的.是第一次写.总觉得有点怪怪的.想请大家帮忙给点建议啊!只有20天的样子了,有点紧张啦...忽忽~ |