- UID
- 550226
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2010-7-27
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
Main idea/Attitude
Author supports using olfactory products for advertisement. Author things that it warrants attention and it represents a different path to the consumer than is afforded by other types of cues.
Structure
Visual and aural cues: studied extensively, yet, olfactory cues: virtually no attention. 概况性开头,提出客观实施,下面应该进一步阐述为什么这样)
Paragraph 1
• Scents are used everywhere:
o Often been used in advertising productions in which scent is a primary attribute, eg perfume samples.
o However, also have been used for products for which scents has been considered largely irrelevant, e.g. pine scented ad for gin, leather-scented strips for cars, floral-spices-scented panels for tourism ad.
• Conclusion – use of scents in advertising warrants attention (这句是作者观点,下一段就该讲为什么这么说? 有没有什么证据呢或者例子呢)
Paragraph 2
• View : odors differ from the pictures and sounds more familiar to advertising researchers.
o Evi 1- odors are difficult to recognize, label, may produce false alarms and create placebo effects. 进一步举例证明为什么难辨别
Literature: limited ability to attach a name to an odor ~40% to 50%
Ability to detect/recognize is influenced by surrounding cutes – lemon
False alarms – perceiving an odor when in reality no odor is present
Both emotional and physical states can be affected just by believing an odor. – Placeob effects.
整个第二段根本没有说为什么olfactory warrants attention啊,那第三段就必须得说了,再不说作者就没有机会了,写这篇文章得目的就丧失了
Paragraph 3
果然,作者抓住了机会,开头就转折说olfactory cues 在什么情况下有用 (混乱的环境下)。 然后接着讲怎么发生作用的。Autonomic, affecting a person physiologically before affecting cognition. 结论,olfaction represents a different path to the consumer than is afforded by other types of cues.
|
|