ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: tania
打印 上一主题 下一主题

tania的考试复习计划贴:谢谢大家的帮助和支持!!M51,V41,760!

[复制链接]
371#
发表于 2005-9-8 13:54:00 | 只看该作者

好吧,我同意第7题是A.


但是第4题问的是文章的purpose. 我是根据第一句话判断的:


The term “episodic memory” was introduced by Tulving to refer to what he considered a uniquely human capacity......


然后接下来说Clayton实验证明一种鸟也具有类似的episodic memory,


难道不是为了说明T的观点是错误的吗?

372#
发表于 2005-9-8 16:32:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用tania在2005-9-8 11:50:00的发言:

24、


Until the passage of the Piracy and Counterfeiting Amendments Act in 1982, a first-time charge of copyright infringement was merely a misdemeanor charge, federal prosecutors being unlikely in pursuing criminal copyright infringers, while offenders were subject to relatively small penalties.



A: charge, federal prosecutors being unlikely in pursuing criminal copyright infringers, while offenders were



B: charge, with federal prosecutors who were unlikely to pursue criminal copyright infringers, offenders being



C: charge, federal prosecutors unlikely to pursue criminal copyright infringers, while offenders were



D: charge; therefore, federal prosecutors were unlikely in pursuing criminal copyright infringers and offenders being



E: charge; therefore, federal prosecutors were unlikely to pursue criminal copyright infringers, and offenders were


答案选e,我选的c,觉得c有他的道理啊


一是a first-time charge of copyright infringement was merely a misdemeanor charge与后面的offenders were subject to relatively small penalties直接对应,逻辑上清晰,这里的while做同时讲


我觉得while在这里做“当……”显然不合理,表对比的话,从两句话的意思来看,更像是因果而非比照


二是federal prosecutors unlikely to pursue criminal copyright infringers做独立主格,也没有改变句子原意


句子原意这个东西不大好判断,这道题A的意思不好,而E很符合逻辑


E虽然没有什么错误,但总觉得跟原文的意思有些不同了,原文并没有将后两者(federal prosecutors 和offenders)的行为作为misdemeanor的结果啊


刚刚查了一下独立主格的用法,可以用在句子中间,例句如下:


The coward was backing,his face being deathly pale,toward another room.


综上所述,24题我选E



第28题是个逻辑题,现在还没有人讨论过,(看来偶比较笨),我在逻辑区发了个帖子,链接如下,大家要去讨论帮助我哦,先谢谢了



http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardid=24&id=131287


我选D,已经在那边回了


大家讨论

373#
发表于 2005-9-8 17:49:00 | 只看该作者

28-17: In the nation of Partoria, large trucks currently account for 6 percent of miles driven on Partoria’s roads but are involved in 12 percent of all highway fatalities. The very largest trucks – those with three trailers – had less than a third of the accident rate of single- and double-trailer trucks. Clearly, therefore, one way for Partoria to reduce highway deaths would be to require shippers to increase their use of triple-trailer trucks.


Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?


A: Partorian trucking companies have so far used triple-trailer trucks on lightly traveled sections of major highways only.


B: No matter what changes Partoria makes in the regulation of trucking, it will have to keep some smaller roads off-limits to all large trucks.


C: Very few fatal collisions involving trucks in Partoria are collisions between two trucks.


D: In Partoria, the safety record of the trucking industry as a whole has improved slightly over the past ten years.


E: In Partoria, the maximum legal payload of a triple-trailer truck is less than three times the maximum legal payload of the largest of the single-trailer trucks


这题是他因削弱,对吗??低的rate来自lightly traveled,是这样理解吗??

374#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-9-8 19:58:00 | 只看该作者
同意,triple之所以事故率低,不是因为它安全,而是因为它on lightly traveled sections of major highways only,属于有其他原因解释,也就是他因削弱
375#
发表于 2005-9-8 22:43:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用薰衣紫草在2005-8-28 8:56:00的发言:





平时复习SC的方法绝对不是考试时做题的方法. 平时字斟句酌就是为了培养一种条件反射的能力, 到考试时迅速排除. 我模考做GWD语法的平均时间不会超过30秒一题. 10题里的语法我会故意放慢速度, 逐一看过, 但到后面, 特别是20题以后, 不会多于30. 考试时候的方法就是前3, 3, 再中间. 很多题目都可以靠这6个词解决, 大概只要20, 因为分别2/3split以后就只剩下一个了.  下面我举一个比较有代表性的例子:



GWD24-13


Vivien Thomas, who had no formal medical training, in struggling against overwhelming odds, he became a cardiac surgeon and eventually to receive an honorary doctorate from laceName w:st="on">JohnslaceName> laceName w:st="on">HopkinslaceName> laceType w:st="on">UniversitylaceType>.


A) who had no formal medical training, in struggling against overwhelming odds, he became


B) having had no formal medical training, in struggling against overwhelming odds to become


C) who, having no formal medical training, he struggled against overwhelming odds in becoming


D) who, having had no formal medical training and struggled against overwhelming odds, became (E)


E) who had no formal medical training, struggled against overwhelming odds to become




这道题上来就可以用having排除BCD, A后面又重复主语引起一个新的句子(我把它称之为主语缀述”). 这道题对我而言, 10秒之内就可以解决. 当然, 如果不放心, 仔细看可以发现A前半句的结构dangling, 但我不会过多纠缠, 一般如果能靠6词确定就move on, 不行再看中间. 我在考场上做的语法题, 特别是前面的, 都很长, 我基本上都在30秒解决 (10题除外). 其实语法点就那些, again, 把信息简化. 看透出题思路, 靠排除 对症下药. 当然,  这样的方法总会有例外, 但我觉得花再多的时间也许可以找出为数不多的错误, margin不高. 很幸运的是, 我考试的题目没有特别反常规的思路.







为什么一看到having就排除呢??我只知道having done做定语必错,可是C不是啊!!C倒是可以用“主语缀述”排除
376#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-9-8 23:23:00 | 只看该作者

不是很清楚,是不是熏衣总结出来的??


这两天状态不佳,数学很简单都会错,弄得自己一点信心都没有,虽然不停的告诉自己细心细心再细心,但还是粗心,甚至连加减乘除都会算错了


如何才能持续保持良好的精神状态呢??大家都是怎样做的??有什么好的建议没有??


不知现在是属于考前综合症还是什么,现在觉得自己好笨,好没用,很像小猪头总结里面提到的一战时的那种反应慢的状态,连数学反应都慢了好多,做每一道题都不相信自己了,总是很不踏实的感觉,不知该如何克服??


明天开始只剩下10天了,心里有些紧张了

377#
发表于 2005-9-8 23:36:00 | 只看该作者

我数学错12题的还活着呢,别急。


像我这样错到都不敢数了,就不顾死活了。心情自然不再郁闷,有的只是过一天复习一天,豁出去的感觉。

378#
发表于 2005-9-8 23:41:00 | 只看该作者
道可道,非常道。名可名,非常名。

  无名天地之始;有名万物之母。


  故常无,欲以观其妙;常有,欲以观其徼。


  此两者,同出而异名,同谓之玄。玄之又玄,众妙之门。


就我理解,大意是努力了就会有结果,

379#
发表于 2005-9-9 01:06:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用tania在2005-9-8 23:23:00的发言:

不是很清楚,是不是熏衣总结出来的??


这两天状态不佳,数学很简单都会错,弄得自己一点信心都没有,虽然不停的告诉自己细心细心再细心,但还是粗心,甚至连加减乘除都会算错了


如何才能持续保持良好的精神状态呢??大家都是怎样做的??有什么好的建议没有??


不知现在是属于考前综合症还是什么,现在觉得自己好笨,好没用,很像小猪头总结里面提到的一战时的那种反应慢的状态,连数学反应都慢了好多,做每一道题都不相信自己了,总是很不踏实的感觉,不知该如何克服??


明天开始只剩下10天了,心里有些紧张了


Tania,看到你这么晚了还没睡,想说几句...

我们的状态都是此起彼伏的,记得我情绪很差的时候,你的话往往让我重新打起精神

一直都非常佩服你的精神和成果  真的

而且也非常相信你的这种有些急躁只是表面的 暂时的

我按照你前面制定的计划自己试着跟着执行,结果这个计划太多了,我每天根本完不成这些任务

当时,我就在想,tania的一天会比我累得多了...

是不是这样大强度的学习导致了精神有些压抑呢 (这样往往会出现你说的最简单的题目都会做错,不过我也一样

相信自己  相信我们的努力一定会有回报

送还给你这句话,

再坚持坚持吧,就快好了,那时我们一定可以欣赏到北京最美丽的秋天



[此贴子已经被作者于2005-9-9 1:07:17编辑过]
380#
发表于 2005-9-9 11:21:00 | 只看该作者

都跑到哪里去了? 也没人来和我讨论阅读了。算了,做数学去先


您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2026-1-26 13:17
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部