想带着大家每天坚持读逻辑,就拿来Source为鸡精的逻辑真题,每天带着大家打卡,希望大家能坚持每天学习+逻辑打卡; 大家可以在有限时间内阅读并分析逻辑链,本帖回复结构和猜测的答案方向,可以看看谁猜的准!大家都是大侦探! 每日的答案和结构在揽瓜阁逻辑群中更新 揽瓜阁逻辑群加群方式在本文末尾 考试群: 揽瓜阁阅读精读(读什么文章,大家读过就懂了): 公众号:1.考什么试 2.商校百科 申请群 1. ChaseDream 2023 MBA 申请/校友答疑/面试群: 2.英国,新加坡,美国,法国,加拿大,香港,德国商科申请群: 3. 行业分享交流/职业规划群: 小红书: 1.留学+考试 最新消息 关注妥妥妥了 (小红书号:323014154) 2.求职+MBA 最新消息 关注元(小红书号:895404330) 朋友们!揽瓜阁逻辑小分队重新上线啦~每日材料我们仍旧会发布在ChaseDream GMAT 逻辑版块。 为了响应大家想拉群专门讨论2022揽瓜阁逻辑的要求,我们设立了小范围的打卡群(仅针对确定会打卡的同学),现作出揽瓜阁逻辑2022打卡群入群流程如下: 2.向小蓝鸡发送关键字:【揽瓜阁逻辑2022】并附上三次任务截图后耐心等待入群即可。 3. 本次小分队活动为纯公益性活动,为了督促大家学习,采取严格的打卡审查制度,连续三日不打卡的朋友会被无情清退。 ⚠️重要提醒:如您还不是GMAT交流群群友,请先申请进入GMAT交流群后再申请进入揽瓜阁逻辑2022打卡群 最新鸡麦群入口: 手机微信打开或者电脑网页打开均可,记得一定要登录再填,无需跳转APP
Day 7
1. 牛奶 空的
学校食堂把牛奶carton换成牛奶袋之后发现收餐的时候 牛奶袋比之前的牛奶carton平均都会空许多(容量前后不变), 然后得出结论是换成牛奶袋增加了学生的牛奶摄入量
问这个argument depends on which assumption
2. 医药公司(今日份送分题)
医药公司claim他们的广告是为了educate patients (重点),但是现实中因为规定广告说出效果就需要说出反效果,所以很多医药广告都其实没怎么说他到底是什么效果。结论问,可以从这个推出什么结论。
3. 海洋生物
About 2.8 million years ago, many species that lived near the ocean floor suffered substantial population declines. These declines coincided with the onset of an ice age. The notion that cold killed those bottom-dwelling creatures outright is misguided, however; temperatures near the ocean floor would have changed very little. Nevertheless, the cold probably did cause the population declines, though indirectly. However, any bottom-dwellers depended for food on plankton, small organisms that lived close to the surface and sank to the bottom when they died. Most probably, the plankton suffered a severe population decline as a result of sharply lower temperatures at the surface, depriving many bottom-dwellers of food.
In the paleontologist's reasoning, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
(A) The first introduces the hypothesis proposed by the paleontologist; the second is a judgment offered in spelling out that hypothesis
(B) The first introduces the hypothesis proposed by the paleontologist; the second is a position that the paleontologist opposes.
(C) The first is an explanation challenged by the paleontologist; the second is an explanation proposed by the paleontologist.
(D) The first is a judgment advanced in support of a conclusion reached by the paleontologist; the second is that conclusion.
(E) The first is a generalization put forward by the paleontologist; the second presents certain exceptional cases in which that generalization does not hold.
|