[揽瓜阁逻辑小分队] day7

去很多地方

?

去很多地方

1.排除他因：牛奶没有被倒掉
2.医药公司不说效果不能达到educate的目的
3.A

Hazellto

Mark一下！               

DonkeyG

Day 7
1.        牛奶 空的
学校食堂把牛奶carton换成牛奶袋之后发现收餐的时候 牛奶袋比之前的牛奶carton平均都会空许多(容量前后不变)， 然后得出结论是换成牛奶袋增加了学生的牛奶摄入量
问这个argument depends on which assumption

Carton不会比袋子更难喝干净，就是要证明这俩包装各方面一致才行。

2.        医药公司（今日份送分题）
医药公司claim他们的广告是为了educate patients (重点），但是现实中因为规定广告说出效果就需要说出反效果，所以很多医药广告都其实没怎么说他到底是什么效果。结论问，可以从这个推出什么结论。

结论是医药公司不愿意说出反效果或者不怎么说反效果。

3.        海洋生物
About 2.8 million years ago, many species that lived near the ocean floor suffered substantial population declines. These declines coincided with the onset of an ice age. The notion that cold killed those bottom-dwelling creatures outright is misguided, however; temperatures near the ocean floor would have changed very little. Nevertheless, the cold probably did cause the population declines, though indirectly. However, any bottom-dwellers depended for food on plankton, small organisms that lived close to the surface and sank to the bottom when they died. Most probably, the plankton suffered a severe population decline as a result of sharply lower temperatures at the surface, depriving many bottom-dwellers of food.
In the paleontologist's reasoning, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
(A) The first introduces the hypothesis proposed by the paleontologist; the second is a judgment offered in spelling out that hypothesis
(B) The first introduces the hypothesis proposed by the paleontologist; the second is a position that the paleontologist opposes.
(C) The first is an explanation challenged by the paleontologist; the second is an explanation proposed by the paleontologist.
(D) The first is a judgment advanced in support of a conclusion reached by the paleontologist; the second is that conclusion.
(E) The first is a generalization put forward by the paleontologist; the second presents certain exceptional cases in which that generalization does not hold.

a

mushroom_GMAT

看一下！               

在水里睡觉

Mark一下！               

mushroom_GMAT

Day 7
1.        牛奶 空的
学校食堂把牛奶carton换成牛奶袋之后发现收餐的时候 牛奶袋比之前的牛奶carton平均都会空许多(容量前后不变)， 然后得出结论是换成牛奶袋增加了学生的牛奶摄入量
问这个argument depends on which assumption

P：牛奶袋比牛奶盒空的更多
C：换成牛奶袋增加了学生的牛奶摄入量

找gap：牛奶袋空的部分确实是被学生喝掉了，而不是被倒掉了，或者漏掉了


2.        医药公司（今日份送分题）
医药公司claim他们的广告是为了educate patients (重点），但是现实中因为规定广告说出效果就需要说出反效果，所以很多医药广告都其实没怎么说他到底是什么效果。结论问，可以从这个推出什么结论。

广告说出正就效果就要说出反效果
医药广告没有说出效果

归纳：这些医药广告就称不上广告，达不到想要的目的

3.
第一处黑体字是结论
第二处黑体字支持结论
A

Ryyoo

在水里睡觉

1. 假设：学生没有倒牛奶，或者换包装前后，学生倒牛奶的总量不变

2. 医药公司的产品的反效果很吓人，所以只能靠教育型广告提升一下品牌知名度这样子

3. A  
逻辑：冷→深海生物的食物P大量死亡→深海生物没食物变少，死了            
结论：冷是深海生物死亡的间接原因
第一句是结论，第二句是论据支撑结论，选A

邦德王

Day 7

1. 牛奶 空的

学校食堂把牛奶carton换成牛奶袋之后发现收餐的时候 牛奶袋比之前的牛奶carton平均都会空许多(容量前后不变)， 然后得出结论是换成牛奶袋增加了学生的牛奶摄入量

问这个argument depends on which assumption

assumption应该跟容量有关，找到影响容量的其他原因。

2. 医药公司（今日份送分题）

医药公司claim他们的广告是为了educate patients (重点），但是现实中因为规定广告说出效果就需要说出反效果，所以很多医药广告都其实没怎么说他到底是什么效果。结论问，可以从这个推出什么结论。

广告并没有educate patients

3. 海洋生物

About 2.8 million years ago, many species that lived near the ocean floor suffered substantial population declines. These declines coincided with the onset of an ice age. The notion that cold killed those bottom-dwelling creatures outright is misguided, however; temperatures near the ocean floor would have changed very little. Nevertheless, the cold probably did cause the population declines, though indirectly. However, any bottom-dwellers depended for food on plankton, small organisms that lived close to the surface and sank to the bottom when they died. Most probably, the plankton suffered a severe population decline as a result of sharply lower temperatures at the surface, depriving many bottom-dwellers of food.

In the paleontologist's reasoning, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

(A) The first introduces the hypothesis proposed by the paleontologist; the second is a judgment offered in spelling out that hypothesis

(B) The first introduces the hypothesis proposed by the paleontologist; the second is a position that the paleontologist opposes.

(C) The first is an explanation challenged by the paleontologist; the second is an explanation proposed by the paleontologist.

(D) The first is a judgment advanced in support of a conclusion reached by the paleontologist; the second is that conclusion.

(E) The first is a generalization put forward by the paleontologist; the second presents certain exceptional cases in which that generalization does not hold.

A