[揽瓜阁逻辑小分队] day7

白白有点黑

同意！               

Muqierrrrr

Day 7
1.       牛奶 空的
学校食堂把牛奶carton换成牛奶袋之后发现收餐的时候 牛奶袋比之前的牛奶carton平均都会空许多(容量前后不变)， 然后得出结论是换成牛奶袋增加了学生的牛奶摄入量
问这个argument depends on which assumption

牛奶剩的少就是喝的多？有没有可能倒掉？

所以assumption应该是倒掉的量前后一样
2.       医药公司（今日份送分题）
医药公司claim他们的广告是为了educate patients (重点），但是现实中因为规定广告说出效果就需要说出反效果，所以很多医药广告都其实没怎么说他到底是什么效果。结论问，可以从这个推出什么结论。

没达到教育效果？他们的claim没做到
3.       海洋生物
About 2.8 millionyears ago, many species that lived near the ocean floor suffered substantialpopulation declines. These declines coincided with the onset of an ice age. Thenotion that cold killed those bottom-dwelling creatures outright is misguided,however; temperatures near the ocean floor would have changed very little. Nevertheless, the coldprobably did cause the population declines, though indirectly. However, any bottom-dwellers depended for food onplankton, small organisms that lived close to the surface and sank to thebottom when they died. Most probably, the plankton suffered a severepopulation decline as a result of sharply lower temperatures at the surface,depriving many bottom-dwellers of food.
In thepaleontologist's reasoning, the two portions in boldface play which of thefollowing roles?
(A) The firstintroduces the hypothesis proposed by the paleontologist; the second is ajudgment offered in spelling out that hypothesis
(B) The firstintroduces the hypothesis proposed by the paleontologist; the second is aposition that the paleontologist opposes.
(C) The first is anexplanation challenged by the paleontologist; the second is an explanationproposed by the paleontologist.
(D) The first is ajudgment advanced in support of a conclusion reached by the paleontologist; thesecond is that conclusion.

(E) The first is ageneralization put forward by the paleontologist; the second presents certainexceptional cases in which that generalization does not hold.         

zzz1.

看一下！               

girigiri_I

看一下！               

Hazellto

打卡！

George_chen

看一下！               

girigiri_I

        1.  
                a. there is no waste of milk due to the packages of it
                b. the sales of milk do not decrease
        2. educated patients won't purchase their products if they know the by-effect
3. A

zzz1.

1.牛奶
F：把牛奶盒换成牛奶袋之后，收餐时剩下的牛奶更少了
C：换成牛奶袋增加了学生的牛奶摄入量
Q：assumption
1）换包装后喝牛奶的人数没有变化
2）空出的袋装容量比盒子容量少

2.医药公司
P：医药公司打广告是为了教育病人；因为说效果就要说出正负效果，很多广告没说效果
Q：conclusion
没说效果起不到educate的作用

3.海洋生物
F - P - P/however - nevertheless支持前一个P - however - C
Q：boldface
OA：D

白白有点黑

kk

白白有点黑

        7. 9/26
                1.        牛奶 空的
                学校食堂把牛奶carton换成牛奶袋之后发现收餐的时候 牛奶袋比之前的牛奶carton平均都会空许多(容量前后不变)， 然后得出结论是换成牛奶袋增加了学生的牛奶摄入量
                问这个argument depends on which assumption
                ——相关因果，变量1学校把牛奶carton换成牛奶袋，变量2 牛奶摄入量
                ——推测方向：排除因果倒置，排除独立因素，给予不同时间维度的证明，排除中介
                ——可能的答案：牛奶没有变，没有其他因素影响牛奶摄入，不是因为牛奶摄入增加而换成牛奶袋..
                2.        医药公司（今日份送分题）
                医药公司claim他们的广告是为了educate patients (重点），但是现实中因为规定广告说出效果就需要说出反效果，所以很多医药广告都其实没怎么说他到底是什么效果。结论问，可以从这个推出什么结论。
                ——不想让消费者知道反效果？
                3.        海洋生物
                About 2.8 million years ago, many species that lived near the ocean floor suffered substantial population declines. These declines coincided with the onset of an ice age. The notion that cold killed those bottom-dwelling creatures outright is misguided, however; temperatures near the ocean floor would have changed very little. Nevertheless, the cold probably did cause the population declines, though indirectly. However, any bottom-dwellers depended for food on plankton, small organisms that lived close to the surface and sank to the bottom when they died. Most probably, the plankton suffered a severe population decline as a result of sharply lower temperatures at the surface, depriving many bottom-dwellers of food.
                In the paleontologist's reasoning, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
                (A) The first introduces the hypothesis proposed by the paleontologist; the second is a judgment offered in spelling out that hypothesis
                (B) The first introduces the hypothesis proposed by the paleontologist; the second is a position that the paleontologist opposes.
                (C) The first is an explanation challenged by the paleontologist; the second is an explanation proposed by the paleontologist.
                (D) The first is a judgment advanced in support of a conclusion reached by the paleontologist; the second is that conclusion.
                (E) The first is a generalization put forward by the paleontologist; the second presents certain exceptional cases in which that generalization does not hold.
                ——A