ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: 携隐
打印 上一主题 下一主题

*携隐*小教室(继续回答大家的问题)

[精华]  关闭 [复制链接]
751#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-5-30 12:03:00 | 只看该作者
嘿嘿,番茄,用不着不见男朋友吧~叫他来给你做饭洗衣服买零食……
752#
发表于 2005-5-30 15:43:00 | 只看该作者
我也来顶~~
753#
发表于 2005-5-30 16:35:00 | 只看该作者

亲爱的们,大家复习得怎样了?由于复习得不充分,我的考试延到六月底了,现在在作狒狒和语法大全,有点问题和大家讨论一下。



1. Historian: We can learn about the medical history of individuals through chemical analysis of their hair. It is likely, for example, that Isaac Newton’s psychological problems were due to mercury poisoning; traces of mercury were found in his hair. Analysis is now being done on a lock of Beethoven’s hair. Although no convincing argument has shown that Beethoven ever had a venereal disease, some people hypothesize that venereal disease caused his deafness. Since mercury was commonly ingested in Beethoven’s time to treat venereal disease, if researchers find a trace of mercury in his hair, we can conclude that this hypothesis is correct.



Which one of the following is an assumption on which the historian’s argument depends?



A.       None of the mercury introduced into the body can be eliminated.


B.        Some people in Beethoven’s time did not ingest mercury.


C.       Mercury is an effective treatment for venereal disease.


D.       Mercury poisoning can cause deafness in people with venereal disease.


E.        Beethoven suffered from psychological problems of the same severity as Newton’s.



There should be 2 assumptions to support the hypothesis. The 1st assumption of the author is that only venereal disease will be treated by mercury in Beethoven’s time. The 2nd assumption is only some people in Beethoven's time will ingest mercury, if all people ingest mercury, the evidence is not useful. So, some people in Beethoven's time did not ingest mercury. The answer should be B.



不明白 if all people ingest mercury, the evidence is not useful. So, some people in Beethoven's time did not ingest mercury.

754#
发表于 2005-5-30 16:54:00 | 只看该作者

亲爱的们,还有几个语法大全里的题,大家看看


19.   The last “wild” Indian in North America, according to anthropologist Alfred Kroeber, was the lone survivor of California’s lost Yahi tribe, which staggered out of the mountains near Lassen Peak in 1912, deep in mourning for the last of his companions, expecting to be butchered and eaten by white ranchers.


(A) which


(B) who


(C) that


(D) the survivor havingB


(E) having


Yahi tribe 后面不是用which,我看讨论时有人说which staggered out of the mountains near Lassen Peak in 1912修饰 the lone survivor ,我觉得有点牵强。


14.   The Western world’s love affair with chocolate is well-documented: few people have been known to have tasted it for the first time without requesting more.


(A) few people have been known to have tasted it


(B) few having been known to taste it


(C) it has been tasted by few people


(D) few people have been known to taste it(D)


(E) few people having tasted it


为何不是(A) few people have been known to have tasted it,是先尝了才知道要不要更多的,不知大家怎么理解

755#
发表于 2005-5-30 17:05:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用携隐在2005-5-30 0:07:00的发言:


同感。尤其最近在用lawyer的分类重新看OG,重新接受一种思维的过程,连最简单的题目都想不通,原来轻易排除的答案此时都开始迷惑。不过渐渐就好了,同类型的题目看到10来道的时候,结合他的解释,就觉得开始顺畅了,越到后面,顺的越快。不知道是不是能一直这么顺利突破下去。


亲爱的,你说的lawyer的分类,就是他关于gmat题型的总结么,还是有其他的像与法菜鸟手册一样的把og逻辑进行的分类?我也在看og逻辑,解释看得我很郁闷!

756#
发表于 2005-5-30 17:17:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用方亦秋在2005-5-30 17:05:00的发言:


亲爱的,你说的lawyer的分类,就是他关于gmat题型的总结么,还是有其他的像与法菜鸟手册一样的把og逻辑进行的分类?我也在看og逻辑,解释看得我很郁闷!


同感,同感!郁闷也得看啊!!

757#
发表于 2005-5-30 18:43:00 | 只看该作者
携隐JJ~~
758#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-5-30 20:40:00 | 只看该作者

JJ你好~久闻您的大名~想象您请教一些问题好吗
我6月24就考了 可现在复习的非常不怎么样 语法错在40`50% 逻辑很差 阅读时好时坏而且经常超时 数学刚做不久 我想我的情况去考试肯定结果不会很好 但是我不想延期 所以 请JJ指点我该如何在剩下的时间里复习呢 我想把精力集中在GWD和天山和机井上 其他材料还应该看些什么呢 我全天都可以看书时间 时间应该怎么分配呢 望JJ帮我指点迷津 谢谢~~


sorryMM,没有收到你同意的消息前,没敢把你的短信贴出来。现在就回答。


不知道你到目前为止是复习了哪些材料?版上很多NN都说过了,复习要以OG为根本,可是我看你上面根本都没有提到OG。OG是官方教材,其解释非常有价值。你沉下心来,把OG的SC好好看个三遍,每一遍都要仔细读它的解释,没一遍都要把自己没有搞懂的题目到语法区去找讨论贴或提问,弄懂为止。在看第二遍或第三遍OG时,可以看一下白勇的语法书,他对各种题型有一个分类总结,你时间不多,看他的总结就可以,不用再自己去横向总结了。


阅读和逻辑,还是一个字,练。阅读你先到阅读区去看一下置顶的帖子,体会一下小安阅读法和XDF的阅读方法,体会一下各个NN所说的阅读复习方法,然后将OG的41篇文章好好做一遍,分析一遍。接下来再按照同样的方法把GWD阅读做一遍分析一遍。强化自己对阅读方法的运用就可以了。逻辑也是一样,看OG,分析自己的思路,不懂的题目搜索一下讨论贴,重点看一下lawyer的几篇文章以及lawyer和mindfree对一些题目的解答思路。


方法就是这样,其实很简单。MM对自己的正确率不要太在意,毕竟还有一个月。你可以看看我的教训贴,我在考前一个月的正确率也很低。重要的是你要从现在开始,充分利用时间,只有20几天了,你不能再浪费任何一点时间去怀疑或害怕或其他的什么了。


最后还是要说,如果考前一周觉得自己还是没有准备好,那还是延期吧。不要打没准备的仗。

759#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-5-30 20:43:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用方亦秋在2005-5-30 17:05:00的发言:


亲爱的,你说的lawyer的分类,就是他关于gmat题型的总结么,还是有其他的像与法菜鸟手册一样的把og逻辑进行的分类?我也在看og逻辑,解释看得我很郁闷!


是他对题型的分类,在逻辑区的置顶里有相关链接。看看他的文章,很有帮助。我有一个老的分类,是根据XDF的方法简单分为削弱、加强、假设、解释、填空和评价的,如果你需要的话,我明天找个时间列一下。

你上面的题目疑问,我明天回答你。今天晚上先照计划看OG逻辑去了。

760#
发表于 2005-5-30 21:57:00 | 只看该作者

谢谢JJ~


我OG语法到是看过阅读和逻辑也在做 可是看到大家说的好象GWD和天山和机井十分十分重要 所以我现在也没别的办法了 只能所有的一起做了 JJ~ GWD指的是不是只是机警中的难题? 天山呢? 我是不是要OG+GWD+天山+机警+摸考呢   

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2026-1-14 06:45
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部