0822 TPO16
(20min,191字)
The passage claims that the archaeology science has faced many problems today, which should arouse people's attention. However, the professor in the lecture disagrees with it, pointing out that the situation had changed since 1990s.Here come the reasons and evidence.
To begin with, the fact that plenty of valuable artifacts lost in the passage is not correct according to the professor. She says that the things is different today and sever plans were made by government to protection the artifacts.
In addition, the opinion supported by the passage that the archaeologists get little financial support is opposite by the professor. She argues that it is the constriction company not the government that the archaeologists should ask for the financial support, for the company is founded to solving those problems in archaeological project.
Lastly, the passage tells that there are not enough jobs for people who want to be a archaeologist. Nevertheless, the professor argues that this was not true, saying that from writing reporter to teacher, there are lots of position in archaeology for people to choose, and that the numbers of job in this field has reaches its highest today.
|