- UID
- 834631
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2012-11-28
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
chemistry
tpo8-L4 EN I
Listen to part of the lecture in a chemistry class.The professor has been discussing the periodic table of elements.So are there any questions?Yes,professor Herison,you were saying that the periodic table was predictive?What exactly does that mean?I mean I know how it organized the elements,but where' s the prediction?Ok,let's look at our periodic table again.Ok,they grouped elements into categories that share certain properties,right? uh-hum.and its arrange according to increasing atomic number which is..the number of proton in each atom of elements.Right,well,early versions of periodic table had gaps,missing elements.Everytime we had one more proton,we had another element.and then oops,the atomic number that was no known elements.and the uh,prediction was,that an element without atomic number existed somewhere,but it just hadn't been found yet.And its location in a table would tell you what properties that should have.It was pretty exciting for scientists at that time to find missing elements to confirm the predictive properties.uh,actually,that reminds me the other very good examples about it,element 43.see on the table the symbols where element 42 and 44,so in the early versions of the table there was no symbols for element 43 proton,because no element 43 proton had been discovered yet.So the periodic table had a gap,between element 42 and 44.and then,in 1925,team of chemists led by ...Tack,claimed that they had found element 43.they had been uh,using a relatively new technology,called x-rays ...and they were using it to examine an ore sample,they claimed they found the element with 43 protons and they named it M.Um,professor Harison,then how come in my periodic table here,element 43,TC,that's T,right?Ok,let me add that.Actually,that's the point I'm coming to.Hardly anyone believed that Tack had discovered the element.X-ray spectrum was a new method at that time,And they were never able to isolate enough M as a way of sample to convince one of the discoveries.So,they were discredited.And then ,12years later,1937,a different team was the first to discover the ..element using a cyclotron.and that element had 43 protons.That's right,and they named it Technesium,to emphasize that it was part of the ..creative technology.And people thought that symplisizing the element making it artificially was the only way to get it.Who still hadn't doubt the current nature.Now elements which were called M or T was radio active.Why is that matter? What's true of the radio active element?It decays,it turns into other elements?Oh,so does that explain why it was missing in the periodic table?Exactly,because it was radio active decay,element 43 doesn't last very long.and therefore...had been decayed ages ago.so the M people were wrong and the T people were right ,right?For that was done.Now we know that the element 43 doesn't occur naturally,it can be naturally generated from ..about it spontaneous ...um,guess what?Before sample the M group ...had plenty of ..not to ..slip the amount of M.So,talks to him very well and found enough M..sample,get uranium who decayed very quickly.And you know here's an incredible irony.Head ..leader Tack becomes the ..team,she was the first to suggest that Uranium could break up into smaller pieces.but she didn't know that was the defence of the whole discovery of element 43.So,is my version of the periodic table was wrong?should element 43 really be called M?Maybe,but now it's hard to tell for sure after all this time if the Tack group did discovere the element 43,They didn't um,publish enough detail on the necessary instruments for us to know for sure.But I like to think the element 43 was discovered twice.As M,it was first almost discovered that the ..in nature,only um sparking the ...and as the ...it was the first element discovered in a laboratory.And of course,that was an element of periodic table right up to expect existed.before anyone had found it or made it. |
|