Anthony Summer的写作贴~~~互帮互助共同进步啊!~~~~~求狠狠的批~~~~~????????????????????????????

amissrosa

11.11 獨立改  來晚了>_<

AnthonySummer

2012-11-12 Patience is usually not a good strategy. We should take action now rather than later.

AnthonySummer

Tpo 24

The reading passage and the professor hold an opposite opinion about the remains of the actual tissues of the fossil. He thinks reveal materials in the breaking of the fossilized leg bone that seems not to be remains of blood vessels, red blood cells, and collagen matrix.

First, the professor points out that those revealed many small branching channels inside the bone are not blood vessels. Actually, it is something else; some bacteria would colonize the moisture part of the bone long after the animal died, therefore the bacteria's remains created the hole, empty vessels inside the bone.

Later the professor illustrates that those spheres that contained iron-a material vital are not red blood cells. He demonstrates that they found same red blood cells from other animals at the same area, even some animals who did not have red blood cells when they alive. The only explanation is that those iron materials come from the local mineral.

Finally, the professor argues that the collagen are never found in a fossil that older than 1000 years, and this fossilized leg bone is 70-million-year-old fossil. If that collagen is not come from fossil, then it may come from human skins, such as researcher who recently handle the fossils.

lizchang1990

查看附件哦!

amissrosa

Anthony你好  這兩天會將你的11.12批改完! 抱歉造成你的困擾

AnthonySummer

11月13日
Some people think university professors should spend more time doing research while others think they should spend more time educating students. What is your view?

Some people argue that university professors should spend more time doing research while others think they should spend more time educating students. To be frank, I cannot agree that a professor who has less time to educate a student would be a great professor. When some senior teacher become professor, they either have decades of teaching experience or they have been working or researching for decades. Therefore, the title of professor gives teachers more authority and power to educate students. Their priority is teaching students, and they should spend more time educating students.

My undergraduate’s professor have many research duties. I can only find him at the research center instead of teachers' office. He was so busy so he hardly had free time to answer my question or the other two classes’ students’ question. Meantime, the professor complained that there have too many students disturbed his research work so he cannot have any research progresses. In my point of view, it is better to professor focus on one dimension, educating students or research, like an old saying. “good horse never run into two directions.” Therefore, the professor can focus on his researching, meantime, he can only teach several master degree students or doctor degree students, furthermore, those students can help him research. Students can learn deeper, they will not ask some basic questions, sometimes, they even can start a debt with the professor about their research directions, come to a right conclusion.

Another reason why I hold my opinion is that university professors should mainly focus on education. It is not a research laboratory. Students come to the university for the value of studying. They want to learn from the most experience and senior teachers – professors. Since students pay for the professor’s salaries, it is professor’s duty to educate students.

Although some students think that if their professors have more researching experience, they would not only learn some paper theory, but also have an opportunity to watch real experiment. It is true that a solid experiment can help students learn better, from a contrary standard, not all the students have this requirement, such students from a finance major and an economics major, the interesting experiment would be the movie of playback of world financial crisis or other experiment that more theoretical. Other majors such as engineering and physics, their experiment would take a very long time such years, and much energy to work out a conclusion, therefore, some senior professor would not have enough time and energy to educate students, that would reduce the teaching quality and bad for university’s reputation.

In one words, although researches can bring a more solid knowledge to students, most of time professors would not have enough time to educate students and answer their question. Most of the time the professor who focusses on research brings us more disadvantages than the beneficent. Taking into account of all these factors, we can reach the conclusion that professors should spend more time educating students.

AnthonySummer

Tpo 23

The reading passage and the professor hold opposites opinions about several hypotheses of the real cause of yellow cedar population declining.

First of all, the professor points out that the health cedar trees produce powerful chemistry on its surface that will kill insects. As contrary, some trees are already ill, so it is less resistant to insect. Therefore, the insect is not a good candidate for the cause of the tree's decline.

Later, the professor argues that the brown bears may damage some trees, but the overall population of trees is declining across the northwestern North America, meantime, some island where do not have the bear, but the trees there are still declining. Therefore, the second hypothesis attributes the decline is caused by brown bears, which are not convinced.

Finally, the professor illustrates that frost will damage the root system of trees. According to the passage's hypothesis, climate changes have affected the root systems of the yellow cedar trees. As instead, he points out many cedar trees live on the low elevation, where is warm, than live on the high elevation, where is colder, died. As the passage's reason, we should expect the low elevation trees's population would die more. Therefore, he points out that the gradual changes of climate are not the real cause.

In one words, those hypotheses in the reading passage are not the real cause of yellow cedar's population declining.

AnthonySummer

Anthony你好  這兩天會將你的11.12批改完! 抱歉造成你的困擾

-- by 会员 amissrosa (2012/11/14 17:17:23)

take your time! You are very responsible!

AnthonySummer

Tpo 22
The professor disagrees about the reading passage's three opinions. He thinks that none of them is (或者are呢）convinced.

First of all, the professor points that the increase products of ethanol fuel would not add burden to global warming. He said that it is true that burning ethanol will create carbon dioxide, but the growing process of planet adsorbs carbon dioxide as part of its nutrition. Thus, ethanol offers environmental advantages over gasoline.

Later, the professor illustrates that the large product of ethanol would not dramatically reduce the substantial source of food for animals. He argues that ethanol would mainly use cellulose as a resource to produce, and animal do （或者does呢）not eat cellulose. Thus, ethanol will not influence animal's food resource.

Finally, the professor demonstrates that the tax subsidies from the United States Government would not need in the future. He points out that if the future production of ethanol increase three times compares to current production, the price of ethanol would decrease forty percentages.

In one conclusion, those reasons in the reading passage are not solid.

AnthonySummer

11月14日

Contributes on an enjoyable vacation, please select one of three selection. Good food, good location and with good friends to travel.



More and more people start to travel around with the developing of economy. Thus, come to a question, which one is the first choice among good food, good location or good friends. The city I live is Shanghai, like New York City, it has unaccountable sky buildings, crowded people, high speed life style, and last but not least: Exotic food come from all over the world. Without going to a different city, my friends and I can try different food every day and all year long. Thus, I will consider a good location at first when I want to travel to a new place.



I believe that the true meaning of vacation is experiencing a new place, surprising by different local customer, discovering a magnificent landscape, and trying something new that I would never find in my city, such as a beach, mountain, nature. I made my first overseas trip to the United States two years ago, my first stop was San Francisco, because we hardly have long break to make a long trip, so I visited Stanford University, I want to know what made America so powerful and free across the world. I was surprised by the weather, sunshine, and freedom. Students lied on the grass, enjoying the sunshine and their books. No guard asked me whether i was this university's students or not before I went in the campus. It even did not have a wall guarding the campus. Here have no air-pollution, I made a deep breath, and does not worry about that I would catch lung cancer, cause my city, to be more precise, most of China east coast city are in trouble of air pollution. Smelling showing on students face. They look naive but actually very smart. They are enjoying their studying under sunshine. An old saying said: "A short traveling can benefit us more than ten books." I am thirsting for knowledge and want to experience more culture in my short lifelong. Thus, what can bring me so many funny and interesting experience is traveling to a new place.



I love out-side sports such as surfing, swimming and beach volleyball. I can image that when I lie down on the beach, enjoying the nature's gift - sunshine, pretty girls and handsome boys walk around, and I would never think about anything that related to my hard work and cold city, I would be totally free this moment when i travel to my favorite destination. Thus, I would choose some city such as Los angles, San Diego or Hawaii as my travel paradise. My hometown, Shanghai, has no beach but a polluted sea, a cold winter and a hot summer. I want to use the chance when I travel around to take a look that what kind of city I would choose as my finally retired home. San Diego has the best zoo in the world because of the good weather and furious financial support. Washington, DC has the most diversified peoples because it is the capital of the states, one time I eat dinner with twelve people who come from ten different countries, also it has the best museum system in the world, most important, the tickets are free. Thus, I will (因為是過去發生的，得用would表示嗎？但是我這段的其他時態都是一般現在時，這樣用would會不統一，產生矛盾嗎？O(∩_∩)O謝謝) enjoy discovering the air-space museum and the nature history museum that I would never have a chance to enjoy in Shanghai. New York City just like Shanghai, the metro system is old and complicit, the streets are crowded and the hotel rents are very expensive, thanks to my traveling, I would never choose New York City as my retired place or pursuing a master degree there in the nearby future. Thus, an enjoyable vacation can help me both discover the city and provide brand-new experience of choosing a dreaming vocation paradise.



Although, many people like to travel with their friends, because it can help them know better about each other, and make the friendship much more solid. As instance, I think: "A friend in need is a friend indeed." Friends will (would) help and support each other, but I do not like the friendship become too close. If we live together each time when we would travel around, then we would know everything about the friends, there would no privacy space among us, which would make me feel nervous when I meet my friends the next time.



In one word, although some people would consider good food or traveling with good friends together as their traveling philosophy. I would rather use my standard: discover a new place, change mine into a new mood, and enjoy the lonely when are still single. If I were going to have a girlfriend and therefore marry with my bird, I would have plenty of time travel with my best friend together, my wife, or other friends together. Nevertheless, so far, I consider my points of views are best suit for me.



（870words）