ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: fishli
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]gwd10-20

[复制链接]
21#
发表于 2005-8-13 13:13:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用Avantasia在2005-5-13 20:02:00的发言:

我觉得简洁这个东西不能拿来当作排除一个选项的充分条件.


C里面, birds had been overcome by pollution and routinely fell from the sky above Los Angeles freeways, prompting officials in California to devise a plan that reduced, 这个完成时用的相当的没有理由, 前面有具体的时间状语In the mid-1970’s, 而且从句意上面也说不通.



1.前面有具体的时间状语In the mid-1970’s,.....

這樣是不是代表確切時間點出現時

最好用過去式呢???


2.我還是難以排除C

基本上我覺得C沒有什麼大錯誤....

誰來點一點我阿???

22#
发表于 2005-8-15 06:49:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用gigiga0118在2005-8-13 13:13:00的发言:


1.前面有具体的时间状语In the mid-1970’s,.....

這樣是不是代表確切時間點出現時

最好用過去式呢???



2.我還是難以排除C

基本上我覺得C沒有什麼大錯誤....

誰來點一點我阿???


我的理解是这样的,C有2点不好:

1. 使用了过去完成时,从OG中已经体会到,ETS不喜欢过去完成时态,一定要是表示过去的过去才使用,这里完全没有原因要使用它。另外,本句时间状语是In the mid-1970's典型的过去时时态标志。

2. to devise a plan to do sth. 比 to devise a plan that reduced ...要好! 提出这个计划是为了。。。的目的,而不是针对这个问题在1970年提出一个已经减少汽车排气污染的计划。 注意看c的结尾是 a plan that reduced.


希望对你有帮助!


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-8-15 6:51:53编辑过]
23#
发表于 2005-8-15 07:37:00 | 只看该作者

GWD10-Q20:
In the mid-1970’s, since birds were overcome by pollution, and routinely falling from the sky above Los Angeles freeways, this prompted officials in California to devise a plan that reduced automobile emissions.


A. since birds were overcome by pollution, and routinely falling from the sky above Los Angeles freeways, this prompted officials in California to devise a plan that reduced
B. since birds that had been overcome by pollution were routinely falling from the
sky above Los Angeles freeways, it prompted officials in California to devise a
plan that would reduce
C. birds had been overcome by pollution and routinely fell from the sky above Los
Angeles freeways, prompting officials in California to devise a plan that reduced
D. birds overcome by pollution routinely fell from the sky above Los Angeles
freeways, prompting officials in California to devise a plan to reduce
E. birds overcome by pollution and routinely falling from the sky above Los Angeles freeways were prompting officials in California to devise a plan to reduce


GWD8-Q34:
The first trenches that were cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, have yielded strong evidence for centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East that were arising simultaneously with but independently of the more celebrated city-states of southern Mesopotamia, in what is now southern Iraq.


A. that were cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, have yielded strong
evidence for centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the
Middle East that were arising simultaneously with but
B. that were cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, yields strong evidence that centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East were arising simultaneously with but also
C. having been cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, have yielded strong evidence that centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East were arising simultaneously but
D. cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, yields strong evidence of
centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East
arising simultaneously but also                                                                                    
E. cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, have yielded strong evidence that centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East arose simultaneously with but


这两道题我都做对了,对于答案也没有质疑。但是我当时作对完全是靠语感不是很清楚究竟这种两个动词连用是怎么回事,什么时候可以,什么时候不可以,明白的xdjm们给我讲讲吧!这样考试的时候碰到了才可以保证不错!


非常感谢~~


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-8-15 7:41:58编辑过]
24#
发表于 2005-8-15 13:51:00 | 只看该作者
23楼两句个结构很相似,都是用定语从句修饰主语,从而把主语和谓语隔开了.在定语从句中that is/are通常能省则省,GWD10-20 D中省略了that were,GWD8-32 E中也省略了that were.
25#
发表于 2005-8-15 20:50:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用jaredyu在2005-8-15 13:51:00的发言:
23楼两句个结构很相似,都是用定语从句修饰主语,从而把主语和谓语隔开了.在定语从句中that is/are通常能省则省,GWD10-20 D中省略了that were,GWD8-32 E中也省略了that were.

原来是这样啊!嗬嗬。。。谢谢!

26#
发表于 2005-9-12 10:20:00 | 只看该作者

to kenshin ,


isn't "Since" a conjunction here ?


I thought the key mistake in A is that "were overcome" is wordy and that "this" has no prenoun can refer to.


is that correct ?


As for B, it's wrong adv tense, "had + pp" is not a correct tense for "in the mid-1970's"


just sharing the thoughts, please advise. thanks

27#
发表于 2005-9-12 22:37:00 | 只看该作者

请问E为啥不对


感觉D 和E一样

28#
发表于 2005-9-14 10:26:00 | 只看该作者
我一开始也觉得是E,但后来发现and两边不平行
29#
发表于 2005-9-21 17:30:00 | 只看该作者

I think B is the right answer!

30#
发表于 2005-11-6 02:17:00 | 只看该作者

但是D 把原来的主句的内容变成了分词结构, 原来的从句变成了主句???这样干可以马?



E除了时态不好以外, 没有什么错呀?






頂一下 我也想知道 選了D 是不是有改變句意了??

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-6 05:29
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部