我改完才发现有队友已经给你改过了呢~~但是还是想把我改的给贴上来呢~~呵呵 Society changes as time goes on. People are facing so many important problems today. Some are confident that we can solve them in our life time. However, I don’t think it’s possible. Each of the most important problems is relevant to everybody that it needs not only the progress inscience and technology, but also corporations among countries.
Firstly, though technology improved in the past decades of years, there is still a limit. There is no treatment for cancer and AIDS right now.（建议把前面这两句的位置换一换，换个句型，这样比较扣题，因为熊熊是驳观点~所以TS明显很重要~~） Global warming also threatens human beings, not to mention extreme climate. Besides, we are out of traditional fuel. All of such critical problem scall for breakthroughs in science and technology. We can’t deny that more and more people become researchers, but gifted scientists are still rare. Great scientists don’t come out usually.（小感觉这段没有很好的develop哟~~因为这段里面熊熊提出了几个问题，这些问题都不能被解决，但没有说为什么不能被解决~~建议选一个点深入的说呢~~）
Secondly, regardless of the limit of technology, the cost to make use of new inventions is so huge that not every country can afford it. Actually, a gap exists in the GDP among developed countries and developing countries. There are so many people still in hunger while others are complaining about the taste of dishes. In this aspect, whether there is anew invention has nothing to do with the poor. For example, computers have been invented many years ago, but not until the recent ten years could ordinary people afford to buy one. （点很好~~就是例子有点薄，再深入说明就更完美了~）
Thirdly, governments won’t allow the critical technology to be used in other countries. There is competence among countries in many aspects, such as science, military, etc.. Every country is （a）potential rivals(rival) to others. For instance, as we all know, GPS was invented by the US and it can be used by everyone technically. However, Europe has its own system, so does China and Russia.(这两个句子没有很好的联系上呢~~熊熊你在读读看~~)Nobody would like to share their discoveries with others, especially they are competitors.
I believe that many people can have a qualified life while I don’t think it’s possible to solve all the most important problems in our life time. How could you expect global corporation exists when there are still wars? Technology improves and we’ll live a better life. But there are still problems to be solved.
PS：在第三段我没有说不切题呢~我觉得点很好，我是说这两个句子没有很好的联系For instance, as we all know, GPS was invented by the US andit can be used by everyone technically. However, Europe has its own system, sodoes China and Russia. 就是我读的第一感觉是：美国发明了GPS， 从技术层面来讲（严格意义上来讲）人人都可以用。 但欧洲有自己的系统，中国，俄罗斯也有(我不知道我翻译对没有呢~~因为不知道那个technically在这儿怎么翻)，我当时想的是换成这样：美国发明了GPS， 但并有把这项技术推广到其他国家，相反的是，欧洲有自己的系统， 中国，俄罗斯也一样，这就是技术封锁最好的例子。我是这样想的~~个人观点，要是和亲的想法有出入，或者是改错的地方，一定要告诉我呢~~水平有限所以改错了亲不要介意~~
PS：在第三段我没有说不切题呢~我觉得点很好，我是说这两个句子没有很好的联系For instance, as we all know, GPS was invented by the US andit can be used by everyone technically. However, Europe has its own system, sodoes China and Russia. 就是我读的第一感觉是：美国发明了GPS， 从技术层面来讲（严格意义上来讲）人人都可以用。 但欧洲有自己的系统，中国，俄罗斯也有(我不知道我翻译对没有呢~~因为不知道那个technically在这儿怎么翻)，我当时想的是换成这样：美国发明了GPS， 但并有把这项技术推广到其他国家，相反的是，欧洲有自己的系统， 中国，俄罗斯也一样，这就是技术封锁最好的例子。我是这样想的~~个人观点，要是和亲的想法有出入，或者是改错的地方，一定要告诉我呢~~水平有限所以改错了亲不要介意~~
Some people think university professors should spend more time doing research while others think they should spend more time educating students. What is your view?
As we all know, university professors have two jobs: teaching students and doing research. They must keep a balance between them, but there should be a focus. Some people think professors should spend more time educating students while others think they should concentrate on research instead. Personally, I tend to agree the latter opinion.
To begin, universities are research institutions that professors’ main job is to do research. People admire professors who have made remarkable discoveries, not those who teach students well. Actually, professors are not teachers. University students have already developed the skill of self-study that professor just need to guide them in the right direction. For example, professors usually recommend books for students to read, instead of teaching them in class. Professors devote most of their time in research. For my view, they are scientists that being teachers is one of obligations working in a university.
What’s more, professors can offer students opportunities to do special experiments if they have their own research projects. Students can do not only standard experiments required by textbooks, but also unique ones for professors’ researches. Such experience is beneficial and rare for students because it makes them involved in a real research process. Once a professor focuses on teaching instead of researching, though he may teach better, it’s still a loss for students not doing special experiments.
In addition, doing research makes professors get to know the frontier knowledge of the subject and the knowledge will benefit students a lot. Basic knowledge rarely changes. If professors do not focus on researching, there is no difference between them and teachers in high schools. Education in university is a start for students to be scientists. Professors focusing on teaching students are not qualified to the job. Besides, doing research helps professors better understand knowledge taught in class that it will be easier for students to learn.
I think university professors should focus on researching, though others believe they should spend more time on teaching students. University students have already developed the skill of self-study that teachers no longer need to teach word by word. Focusing on researching can not only help students study in a better way, but also make professors have more breakthroughs that will benefit all the human beings. 很清楚这篇缺少details，没有例子 好心人帮忙想一下呗~熊熊真的不知道该写什么了~~~ thx
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2012-9-7 17:03:00
楼主
