- UID
- 798028
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2012-8-23
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
TPO 2 综合 The professor is not in agreement with the reading passage which suggests that the best way to approach a new project is to work in a team. He uses some foundings of a company to oppose the reading's argument.
First of all, according the company, almost every team gets a free rider who does not contribute more to the project, but also can benefit from the rewording if his/her group do a successful job. On the country, the people who really put a inside on the problem solving are not be named, because the reword were placed on the whole team. It is different from the reading.
Second, the project do not move as quickly as the the reading passage mentioned. The fact is that many groups take many meetings to reach consensus on how to move the project along. It is another part which is different from the reading passage.
Last but not least, the professor says that if one ore two influencers in a group say no to a idea, this idea will be dropt instead of further discussing. What's more , the opinion from individual members will be ignored if he holds the opposites opinion against the influencer' s. However, if this project is failed, the blam will placed on all the groups as a whole but not the influencer only.
8.28独立 Agree or disagree, If child want to do well in school parents should limit the hours of watching TV programs or movies.
Parents focus intensely on the factors that affect their children' s performance in school. An positive studying and communication environment filled with meaningful activities and professional teachers is considered essential. In order to inspire children spend more time on some meaningful things, parents are trying to limit the hours of watching TV programs and movies. I totally support them.
For one reason, if children contribute more time on watching TV program or movies, they might have less time to complete their homework, let along communicating with friends and teachers, or taking part in activities. It is no doubt that these things are necessary to help them improve their performance in school. If they are attracted by unrealistic TV programs, how could they concentrate on improving themselves. Take me as an example, I still remember 4 years ago, I experienced a hard time in my college entrance exams, because I spend a lot of time watch a TV program named XXX. I could not help to watching it because of the attractive plot. I felt down and down at that time, but time could not come back. We need to take responsible for what we did. So limiting the TV- hours for students is a definitely wise move.
For another reason, there are some bad contents in TV programs, especial cartoons, may mislead children to behave unappropriate or even wired in school. According to a recent research on the internet, almost 85 percent of cartoons deliver some unrealistic informations to mislead children, which will exert a negative effect on children' s performance in school. Death Diary is a famous cartoon programs in China, it tells a story about a young student kills people who dislike by writing this special diary note, which mislead children to imitate this young students' s ridiculous behaviour. It creates a illusion for child that if they dislike somebody, they can kill he/her by write diaries. To keep children form these informations, parents definitely need to limit the hours of watching TV programs or movies.
Finally, while most TV programs and movies are not suitable for children to watch, there are also a few of them,such as the Voice of Chins and Chase Dream, benefit children from both physical activities and mental building. This kind of programs encourage student to persue their dreams in a feasible way. So if children want to devote some time on watching these kind of programs, parents should respect their interests.
To sum up, in order to improve children' performance in school, limiting the hours of watching TV programs and movies is a best choice. |
|