【写作小分队】prodliu 作文，欢迎拍砖啊，越多越好

prodliu

The lecture is mainly discussing that some findings of the remain of dinosaur may not real materials that seem to be blood vessel, red blood cells, and collagen matrix.

To begin with, the lecturer arguest that the soft substance inside the channels may be something else. After the animal died, the bacterias sometiomes colonize the hollows where once held blood vessels. As a result,  what the scientists in the reading regard as the blood vessels may just be the traces of  residue left by the bacteria colonized.

Moreover,  according to the lecturer, the researchers found identical spheres in other animals in the same place. That contains some primative animals, which do not have red blood cells. It is quite obviously that if the sphere in the organisms that have no red blood cell, then the sphere cannot be the remain of red cells, may be some red mineral.

Finally,  by so far, reseachers have not found an collagen in animals older than 100,000 years. So  finding  collagen from an animal that lived 70 millions years ago will challenge the idea about how long collagen  can last.  robably, the exist of collagen may not come from the T.rex, but from people's skins, from the skins of researchers when holding the bone.

To sum up, the contents stated in the passage are jeopardized by the speaker and the speaker has completely different opinions on the topics.

prodliu

顺便把原文贴出来

As much as we'd like to have the remains of actual dinosaur tissue, there are sound reasons for being skeptical of the identifications made in the reading.
First, the soft, flexible substance inside the bone channels is not necessarily the remains of blood vessels. It is much more likely to be something else. Like what, You might say.  long after an organism has died, bacterias sometimes colonize hollows, empty areas in bones, like the channels that once held blood vessels. When bacteria lived inside bones, they often leave behind traces of organic material. What the researchers in the reading are identifying as blood vessels might just be traces of soft and moist residue left by bacteria colonies.

All right. what about the iron-filled spheres? Well, the problem is that scientists found identical reddish spheres in fossils of other animals found in the same place. That includes fossils of primitive animals that did not have any red blood cells when they were alive. Clearly, if these spheres appear in organisms that did not have any red blood cells, then the spheres can not be the remains of red blood cells. The spheres probably have a very different origin. They are probably just pieces of reddish mineral.
Third, the collagen. The problem is that we have never found collagen in anmial remains that are older than 100,000 years. Collagen probably cannot last longer than that. Finding collagen from an animal that lived 70 million years ago would really contradict our ideas about how long collagen can last. It is just too improbable. The most likely explanation for the presence of collagen is that it doesn’t come from the T.rex, but from another much more recent source. For example, human skin contains collagen, so the collagen may have come from the skin of the researchers who are handling the bone.

婷婷connie

The lecture is mainly discussing that some findings of the remainsof dinosaur may not real materials that seem to be blood vessels, red blood cells, and collagen matrix.（这里第一段需要把阅读的观点也带一下吗？）

To begin with, the lecturer arguest that the soft substance inside the channels may be something else. After the animal died, the bacterias(我也犯了这个错误) sometiomes colonize the hollows where once held blood vessels. As a result,  what the scientists in the reading regard as the blood vessels may just be the traces of  residue left by the bacteria colonized（colonies用名词形式）.

Moreover,  according to the lecturer, the researchers found identical spheres in other animals in the same place. That contains some primative (primate是灵长类动物吗)animals, which do not have red blood cells. It is quite obviously that if the sphere in the organisms that have no red blood cell, then the sphere cannot be the remain of red cells, may be some red mineral.

Finally,  by so far, reseachers(researchers) have not found an collagen in animals older than 100,000 years. So  finding  collagen from an animal that lived 70 millions years ago will challenge the idea about how long collagen  can last.  robably, the exist of collagen may not come from the T.rex, but from people's skins, from the skins of researchers when holding（handling） the bone.

To sum up, the contents stated in the passage are jeopardized by the speaker and the speaker has completely different opinions on the topics.

3个观点都好准啊，我一定就懵了

prodliu

4月4日 110610NA Doyou agree or disagree with the following statement? It’s more important for thegovernment to build new housing than preserve old historic building.

Recently, a lot of old buildings are demolished in order to create new ones, because some governorshold the philosophy that these novel constructions can represent the sound and rapid development of the country. Is this the way if should be? I am not fondof their ideas. Several historic buildings contain special meanings as a partof culture, so we should spare no effort to preserve them, even though there isa silver lining in doing that.

Preservation of historic buildings is a noble endeavor. The practice of preserving, conserving, andprotecting not only buildings but also whole districts, or parks and monumentsensure that the future generation will have the opportunity to enjoy the greatheritage of the past. Can you imagine what it would be if the Great Pyramids ofEgypt were not preserved in a way? And if, at some point, the Cathedrals of theMedieval and Renaissance period were not preserved and conserved, such greatarchitectural works would have been likened to the ruins of ancient Roman andGreece. These structures include such significant characters or aesthetic valueas part of human’s history, we cannot emphasize the importance of preservingthem too much.

Obviously, these old buildingswitnessed the vicissitude of several kingdoms, which have not only happyendings but also miserable memories. Young people can be inspired to workharder by those heroes who have made great contributions to the country.Simultaneously, people will remember sorrowful past to prevent them fromhappening again. The state of liberty, for example, delivers a message to allhuman beings that we should fight for our freedoms. Therefore, these buildingscan cultivate people’s patriotic emotion and bring us together to establish abetter future.

Meanwhile,old buildings can benefit tourism. Those unique historic stories and beautiful structures attract people from all over the world to visit. As a result, canboost the economic development. Too often we observe that some small townsbecame famous over a night due to those mysterious buildings. So, demolishingthese old building equals to the removal of a great page of our history andleaves a fraction both in history and in culture. That would be an unfortunatefor all humans.

Admittedly,with the rapid development of economy and boom of population, we need newbuildings to satisfy the demanding of specific purposes. For instance, for thesake of accommodating more people and attracting more overseas companies, newskyscraping needed to be established. However, all of these purposes will berealized with taking preserving old buildings into account.

Tosum up, time will move forward, and history needs to be remembered. Ifgovernors single-minded pursue the prosperity of society by sacrificing ourprecious history, I do not believe that our civilization will progress. So, inview of the seriousness of the problem of demolishing old buildings, effectivemeasures should be taken before things get worse.

prodliu

4月4日110610NA Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It’s moreimportant for the government to build new housing than preserve old historicbuilding.

Recently, a lot of old buildings are demolished in order to create new ones, because some governors hold the philosophy that these novel constructions can represent the sound and rapid development of the country. Is this the way if should be? I am not fond of their ideas. Several historic buildings contain special meanings as a part of culture, so we should spare no effort to preserve them, even though there is a silver lining in doing that.

Preservation of historic buildings is a noble endeavor. The practice of preserving, conserving, and protecting not only buildings but also whole districts, or parks and monuments ensure that the future generation will have the opportunity to enjoy the great heritage of the past. Can you imagine what it would be if the Great Pyramids of Egypt were not preserved in a way? And if, at some point, the Cathedrals of the Medieval and Renaissance period were not preserved and conserved, such great architectural works would have been likened to the ruins of ancient Roman and Greece. These structures include such significant characters or aesthetic value as part of human’s history, we cannot emphasize the importance of preserving them too much.

Obviously, these old buildings witnessed the vicissitude of several kingdoms, which have not only happy endings but also miserable memories. Young people can be inspired to work harder by those heroes who have made great contributions to the country. Simultaneously, people will remember sorrowful past to prevent them from happening again. The state of liberty, for example, delivers a message to all human beings that we should fight for our freedoms. Therefore, these buildings can cultivate people’s patriotic emotion and bring us together to establish a better future.

Meanwhile, old buildings can benefit tourism. Those unique historic stories and beautiful structures attract people from all over the world to visit. As a result, can boost the economic development. Too often we observe that some small towns became famous over a night due to those mysterious buildings. So, demolishing these old building equals to the removal of a great page of our history and leaves a fraction both in history and in culture. That would be an unfortunate for all humans.

Admittedly, with the rapid development of economy and boom of population, we need new buildings to satisfy the demanding of specific purposes. For instance, for the sake of accommodating more people and attracting more overseas companies, new skyscraping needed to be established. However, all of these purposes will be realized with taking preserving old buildings into account.

To sum up, time will move forward, and history needs to be remembered. If governors single-minded pursue the prosperity of society by sacrificing our precious history, I do not believe that our civilization will progress. So, in view of the seriousness of the problem of demolishing old buildings, effective measures should be taken before things get worse.

Crystaljoy

4月4日110610NA Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It’s more important for the government to build new housing than preserve old historic building.

Recently, a lot of old buildings are demolished in order to create new ones, because some governors hold the philosophy that these novel(modern 感觉novel偏重新奇) constructions can represent the sound and rapid development of the country. Is this the way if（things） should be? I am not fond of their ideas. Several historic buildings contain special meanings as a part of culture, so we should spare no effort to preserve them, even though there is a silver lining in doing that.

Preservation of historic buildings is a noble endeavor. The practice of preserving, conserving,(是不是没必要了啊？conserve第一个解释就是to protect from harm or loss；=preserve.) and protecting not only buildings but also whole districts, or parks and monuments （+to）ensure that the future generation will have the opportunity to enjoy(appreciate) the great heritage of the past. Can you imagine what it would be if the Great Pyramids of Egypt were not preserved in a way (这什么意思？in a way: 1. To a certain extent; with reservations 2. From one point of view )? And if, at some point, the Cathedrals of the Medieval and Renaissance period were not preserved and conserved, （the loss of 跟后面比较对象对称一下）such great architectural works would havebeen likened to the ruins of ancient Roman and Greece. These structures include such significant characters or aesthetic value as part of human’s history, we cannot emphasize the importance of preserving them too much.

Obviously, these old buildings witnessed the vicissitude of several kingdoms, which have not only happy endings but also miserable memories. Young people can be inspired to work harder by those heroes who have made great contributions to the country. Simultaneously, people will remember sorrowful past to prevent them from happening again.The state of liberty, for example, delivers a message to all human beings that we should fight for our freedoms.Therefore, these buildings can cultivate people’s patriotic emotion and bring us together to establish a better future.（不是我过分啊，你太perfect了。。。）

Meanwhile, old buildings can benefit tourism. Those unique historic stories and beautiful structures attract people from all over the world to visit. As (，as这里连成一句话，要不然后面不成句啊) a result, can boost the economic development. Too often we observe that some small towns became famous over a night due to those mysterious buildings. So, demolishing these old building equals to the removal of a great page of our history and leaves a fraction（这怎么理解啊） both in history and in culture. That would be an unfortunate for all humans（limit in the economic interests of some cities）.(我嚼的吧，这段最后两句有点off point，建议总结句回归本段topic, that is tourism/economy)

Admittedly, with the rapid development of economy and boom of population, we need new buildings to satisfy the demanding（demand） of specific purposes. For instance, for the sake of accommodating more people and attracting more overseas companies, new skyscraping（skyscrapers） needed to be established. However, all of these purposes will be realized with taking preserving old buildings into account.(with preserving the old buildings taken into account.)

To sum up, time will move forward, and history needs to be remembered. If governors single-minded(the single-minded governors) pursue the prosperity of society by sacrificing our precious history, I do not believe that our civilization will progress. So, in view of the seriousness of the problem of demolishing old buildings, effective measures should be taken before things get worse.



掀桌啊~~~写这么好!

现在真觉得，向你说的，不用那些overuse了的过渡词，文章档次提高不少。

prodliu

4月5日 110528NA Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? One can learn a lot about the person from the type of friends the person has.

Some people will judge a person based on his friends, because they hold the philosophy that people with the similar traits are usually more likely to be associated with each other. At the first glance, this argument seems plausible, however, from my personal observation, such a belief may not be impeccable.

Obviously, the personalities of a person can be multifacet and it is too simple to appraise him or her just based on the friends he or she has. On different occasions, a person can behave totally differently. A seemingly serious man may act casually privately and vice versa that thus have entirely different kinds of friends. Take my college teacher for example. Pro. Zhang teaches us accounting and has a lot of friends in academic circle. From this point, people may judge that he is a martinet, just like many of the cynics who living in the ivory tower. On the other hand, privately, he is a super football fan, and often goes into raptures at the mere mention of the club he supports wins the title. Accordingly, it is unilateral to assess a person based on the friends he or she has.

True, people with separate social status or interests may also be good friends for various reasons. In my dorm, for instance, six students are living in one room, and sharing different attributes. Three of us like basketball, and two are big fans of comic, and only I am fond of classic music. Another example is in the famous sitcom ‘Friends’.  Six people of different social backgrounds and distinctive characteristics become closely related. We may never know Joey, an actor, is by looking at his friends Ross, a researcher. Therefore, it is somewhat naïve to say that knowing a person’s friends can help us really know a person.

Admittedly, people with similar concerns tend to be more closely related to each other. To put it exactly, it is usually impossible to let a person who is introverted to make friend with another extroverted one. People with similar social status or interests are more likely to hang out together, because their ways of live are subjected to similar factors. Sometimes housewives may become acquainted with housewives in the supermarket; people who love sports often make friends in the gym. However I still challenge the idea that we can really know about people by what kind of friends they have.

I concede that a person is living a kind of circle that contains many people who share the same or similar personalities, but it does not mean that he or she is trapped in that circle, because people can have many kinds of ways of life and various types of friends, so it is difficult to tell a person’s characteristic by estimating his friends.

prodliu

Recently, a lot of old buildings are demolished in order to create new ones, because some governor shold the philosophy that these modern constructions can represent the sound and rapid development of the country. Is this the wayif(我觉得都可以吧，这个是一个文章上这么写的) should be? I am not fond of their ideas. Several historic buildings contain special meanings as a part of culture, so we shouldspare no effort to preserve them, even though there is a silver lining in doingthat.

Preservation of historic buildings is a noble endeavor. The practice of preserving, and protecting not only buildings but also whole districts, or parks and monuments（这是protect的对象，主语是practice ）ensures that the future generation will have the opportunity to appreciate the great heritage of the past. Can you imagine what it would be if the Great Pyramids of Egypt were not preserved in a method? And if, at some point, the Cathedrals of the Medieval and Renaissance period were not preserved, theloss of such great architectural works would have been likened to the ruins of ancient Roman and Greece. These structures include such significantcharacters or aesthetic value as part of human’s history, we cannot emphasizethe importance of preserving them too much.

Obviously, these old buildingswitnessed the vicissitude of several kingdoms, which have not only happyendings but also miserable memories. Young people can be inspired to workharder by those heroes who have made great contributions to the country.Simultaneously, people will remember sorrowful past to prevent them fromhappening again. The state of liberty, for example, delivers a message to allhuman beings that we should fight for our freedoms. Therefore, these buildingscan cultivate people’s patriotic emotion and bring us together to establish abetter future.

Meanwhile, old buildings can benefit tourism. Those unique historic stories and beautiful structures attractpeople from all over the world to visit that as aresult, can boost the economic development. Too often we observe thatsome small towns became famous overnight due to those mysterious buildings, soif the government replace them with modern buildings, this action willdefinitely retard the acceleration in economy.

Admittedly, with the rapiddevelopment of economy and boom of population, we need new buildings to satisfy the demanding of specific purposes. For instance, for the sake of accommodatingmore people and attracting more overseas companies, new skyscrapers needed tobe established. However, all of these purposes with preserving the old buildings taken into account.
To sum up, new chapters willbe written, and history needs to be remembered. If single-minded governors pursue the prosperity of society by sacrificing our precious history, I do not believe that our civilization will progress, and the demolishing of historic buildings equals to the removal of a great chapter of our history, which results in a fraction断层 both in culture and in human’s civilization. So, in view of the seriousness of the problem of demolishing old buildings, effective measures should be taken before things get worse.

Crystaljoy

The practice of preserving, and protecting not only buildings but also wholedistricts, or parks and monuments ensures that

V 三单

Crystaljoy

我觉得你看的那本书把 it 错打成 if 了。

Is this the way if (it) should be?