- UID
- 779686
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2012-7-11
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
1.
The number of airplanes equipped with a new anticollision device has increased steadily during the past two years. During the same period, it has become increasingly common for key information about an airplane’s altitude and speed to disappear suddenly from air traffic controllers’ screens. The new anticollision device, which operates at the same frequency as air traffic radar, is therefore responsible for the sudden disappearance of key information. Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
(A) The new anticollision device has already prevented a considerable number of mid-air collisions.
Even though it has some advantage, it still may be responsible for the sudden disappearance of key information. (B) It was not until the new anticollision device was introduced that key information first began disappearing suddenly from controllers’ screens.
Yes, this choice points out that before the new anticollision device was introduced, the key information had begun disappearing. BA
In fact, I mistake the meaning of the answer. It is the opposite answer, strengthening the argument, rather than weakening.
The meaning is:
Key information did not first begin disappearing suddenly from controllers’ screens, until the new anticollision device was introduced.
Or
Key information first began disappearing suddenly from controllers’ screens, when the new anticollision device was introduced. (C) The new anticollision device is scheduled to be moved to a different frequency within the next two to three months.
The future plan about the new anticollision device is irrelevant. (D) Key information began disappearing from controllers’ screens three months before the new anticollision device was first tested.
At first glance, it seems to be contender. But please note that it refers that before the new anticollision device was first tested, rather than equipped.
It is the right answer. (E) The sudden disappearance of key information from controllers’ screens has occurred only at relatively large airports.
Because large airports may have equipped this new anticollision device, the answer choice does not weaken the argument.
55. (34557-!-item-!-188;#058&007575) According to the Tristate Transportation Authority, making certain improvements to the main commuter rail line would increase ridership dramatically. The authority plans to finance these improvements over the course of five years by raising automobile tolls on the two highway bridges along the route the rail line serves. Although the proposed improvements are indeed needed, the authority's plan for securing the necessary funds should be rejected because it would unfairly force drivers to absorb the entire cost of something from which they receive no benefit. Which of the following, if true, would cast the most doubt on the effectiveness of the authority's plan to finance the proposed improvements by increasing bridge tolls? (A) Before the authority increases tolls on any of the area bridges, it is required by law to hold public hearings at which objections to the proposed increase can be raised.
Even though the objections can be raised in the hearings, it does not make sure the plan will be canceled. (B) Whenever bridge tolls are increased, the authority must pay a private contractor to adjust the automated toll-collecting machines.
The private contractor cannot weaken the argument, if it is acceptable. (C) Between the time a proposed toll increase is announced and the time the increase is actually put into effect, many commuters buy more tokens than usual to postpone the effects of the increase.
Even though drivers can postpone the effects, it does not make sure that the plan can be canceled. However, it seems like a contender. (D) When tolls were last increased on the two bridges in question, almost 20 percent of the regular commuter traffic switched to a slightly longer alternative route that has since been improved.
Yes, if drivers chose another route, the plan would be highly weakened. BA
Please note that the first sentence reveals that making improvement to the main commuter rail line would increase ridership dramatically.Actually, the ridership decreases. (E) The chairman of the authority is a member of the Tristate Automobile Club that has registered strong opposition to the proposed toll increase.
Only the chairman can not weaken the plan.
56. (34605-!-item-!-188;#058&007579) Crops can be traded on the futures market before they are harvested. If a poor corn harvest is predicted, prices of corn futures rise; if a bountiful corn harvest is predicted, prices of corn futures fall. This morning meteorologists are predicting much-needed rain for the corn-growing region starting tomorrow. Therefore, since adequate moisture is essential for the current crop's survival, prices of corn futures will fall sharply today. Which of the following, if true, most weakens the argument above? (A) Corn that does not receive adequate moisture during its critical pollination stage will not produce a bountiful harvest.
The argument has pointed out that a much-needed rain will come tomorrow. (B) Futures prices for corn have been fluctuating more dramatically this season than last season.
It cannot weaken the argument. (C) The rain that meteorologists predicted for tomorrow is expected to extend well beyond the corn-growing region.
The same to B. (D) Agriculture experts announced today that a disease that has devastated some of the corn crop will spread widely before the end of the growing season.
Yes, this is an alternative cause that can increase the price of corn. BA (E) Most people who trade in corn futures rarely take physical possession of the corn they trade.
It is outside the scope of the argument.
|
|