糊糊,道路这道题的问题是:Which of the following, if true, would cast the most doubt on the effectiveness of the authority's plan to finance the proposed improvements by increasing bridge tolls? 我觉得它weaken不是weaken结论,而是weaken这个政策,结论在一定程度上也在weaken这个政策。 -- by 会员 balapupu (2011/12/5 10:35:11)
我又看了一遍,感觉和噗噗的意见一致啊,所以我就说找不到结论的作用。 -- by 会员 zz42050524 (2011/12/5 11:37:10)
我错了~~我没好好看问题以为是weaken就直接回答了。 如果要是这样的话,那么C,D感觉都很相像。后来我就翻了Ron的解释,然后他是这么说的: if you have a hard number (such as your 1%) that is CLEARLY INSIGNIFICANT, then you should NOT pick that answer.
here's an analogy: let's say that you need $100 to get your car out of a towing lot.
would you rather have $80, or "a decent amount of money"? well, you'd rather have "a decent amount of money", since $80 is clearly not enough.
would you rather have $120, or "a decent amount of money"? well, you'd rather have $120, since that is enough.
that's how it works. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ in any case, it's pretty clear that (d) has a bigger effect than does (c) in this case, for the following TWO reasons:
(1) even if token hoarding does occur, it is extremely unlikely that the effects of token hoarding will amount to 20% OF ALL TOLLS PAID FOR THE NEXT 5 YEARS. that's a lot of tokens.
(2) perhaps more importantly: IF TOKENS ARE HOARDED, then all that is lost is the DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE OLD AND NEW FARES. this is just a % of the fare, perhaps even a small %. on the other hand, IF COMMUTERS SWITCH ROUTES, then THE ENTIRE FARE IS LOST.
if you combine these 2 factors, then there's no question that (d) has a bigger effect than does (c). ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 我再重新分析一遍好了,就是说新的计划是为了来increase road ridership by charging more toll fees on highways along the route, 然后就是说这个方案是无效的,因为没有driver会愿意去支付从中拿不到利益的钱的。然后(C) Between the time a proposed toll increase is announced and the time the increase is actually put into effect, many commuters buy more tokens than usual to postpone the effects of the increase. C说许多commuters购买更多的tokens来延长新方案toll fee的增长。虽说这个选项是在说明这个方案的不可行性,但是并没有直接指出这些commuters在延长这个方案toll fee增长以后会不会继续付这些钱。所以这个方案有可能还是可以实施的。 (D) When tolls were last increased on the two bridges in question, almost 20 percent of the regular commuter traffic switched to a slightly longer alternative route that has since been improved. 然后就是D,D说有20%的commuters将会从现在的road switch to alternative route,而这个route又是以前被improved的,那么如果有这么多人去另外的route就不会有人付toll fee了。这样的话,就相对于C更加weaken conclusion了。 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 感觉是这个样子,open to discuss~~ |