- UID
- 700922
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2011-12-12
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
计时:30s
2) 逻辑链:
Background Information:
Premise: a new plastic that
disintegrates after only three days’ exposure to
sunlight. Once we all complete the switchover
from the old to the new plastic rings
Conclusion: the threat of suffocation that plastic rings pose
to wild animals will be eliminated.
3) 推测: Animal may eat it within the three days.
4) 选项: E
5)分析:
A: Irrelevant
B:Bingo: y showing that even after the switchover is
complete, the threat to animals from plastic rings will persist. Note the carefully
worded nature of the conclusion—the representative does not say the threat
from new plastic rings will be eliminated, but rather the threat from plastic rings,
which includes both old and new rings.
C:irrelevant
D:irrelevant
E:Bingo
The conclusion of this argument is the final sentence, which contains the
conclusion indicator “therefore,” and the conclusion contains a qualification that
This is the most commonly chosen answer, and it is a
perfect example of a Shell Game. In this case, the answer preys upon test takers
who fail to heed Primary Objective #4: “Read closely and know precisely what
the author said. Do not generalize!” Many test takers read the conclusion and
think, “So when they start using these new rings, it will make things better for
the animals.” When these test takers get to answer choice (E), the answer looks
extremely attractive because it indicates that the implementation of the new
rings will also have a harmful effect.我就是这么想。 With this thinking in mind, many test
takers select answer choice (E) thinking it undermines the conclusion and they
are certain they have nailed the question. However, the conclusion is
specifically about suffocation, and answer choice (E) does not address
suffocation. Instead, answer choice (E) is a shell game that attacks a conclusion
that is similar but different than the actual conclusion. Remember, one of the
rules for weakening arguments is to focus on the conclusion, and knowing the
details of the conclusion is part of that focus.
Finally, the placement of answer choice (E) is no accident. Most students do not
immediately identify answer choice (B) as the correct answer, and even those
that keep it as a Contender often feel it could be stronger. Then, just when
things are starting to look bleak, answer choice (E) pops up sounding fairly
reasonable. Most people breathe a sigh of relief and select the answer without
carefully examining the contents. Never choose answer choice (E) just because
the first four answers are not overly attractive! Always make a thorough
analysis of every answer choice and remember that the test makers know that
people get nervous if none of the first four answer choices jump out at them. Do
not let the test takers draw you into a trap!
1) 计时:30s
2) 逻辑链:
Background Information:
Premise: they have attacked tourists swimming and surfing at Tenare's beaches. This has hurt Tenare's tourism industry
Conclusion: the mayor of the island has proposed an ongoing program to kill any tiger sharks within a mile of the beaches.
3) 推测:tourists swim farther than a mile?
4) 选项:
5)分析:
A: Support
B:Irrelevant
C:Irrelevant
D:irrelevant
E:Bingo irrelevant, because the non-beach tourists have no bearing on the issue either way.
here's the basic deal:
* economy has 2 main pillars: TOURISM and FISHING
* tiger sharks are hurting TOURISM
* mayor wants to help TOURISM by killing tiger sharks
if you want to weaken this argument, you want to show that killing the tiger sharks will have a deleterious effect on the other pillar of the economy - namely, FISHING. (note how much more obvious this is if you diagram the passage, as i've roughly done above).
choice d is correct, because it shows that, while killing tiger sharks may be good for TOURISM, it will be bad for FISHING (which, the passage asserts, is ultimately a more important industry).
1) 计时:30s
2) 逻辑链:
Background Information:
Premise: consumers there generally prefer the unique texture of Ertland-grown apples
Conclusion: at half the price of local apples and promoting them as a nourishing, low-cost alternative.
3) 推测: even half price may not be welcomed by people from Ertland
4) 选项: E
5)分析:
A: strengthen
B:irrelevant
C:irrelevant
D:strengthen
E:bingo
1) 计时:30s
2) 逻辑链:
Background Information:
Premise: moving the station's entrance from its current valuable Main Street location to a low-rent adjoining side street and then leasing the high-rent entrance space to retail businesses.
Conclusion: the train company could easily pay for those and all other proposed renovations without negative impact on its tight budget.
3) 推测: It will not affect the amount of people taking the train
4) 选项: B
5)分析:
A: irrelevant
B:bingo
C:irrelevant
D”weaken
E:irrelevant
1) 计时:30s
2) 逻辑链:
Background Information:
Premise: PZ 1000 has the fewest injuries per accident of any car in its class.
Conclusion: that the PZ 1000 is one of the safest cars available today.
3) 推测:fewest injuries not equal to safest car
4) 选项:
5)分析:
A:strengthen
B:strengthen
C:strengthen
D:
E:bingo
|
|