ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: ReedSong
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD-13-17

[复制链接]
31#
发表于 2005-2-27 13:18:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用horsefish在2004-9-23 10:31:00的发言:

17我选B,


A 中的sell文章里没提过, 只说不能做某类的, 没说不能卖



想了半天,还是倾向于B,理由与horsefish一样,




  1. seamstresses were not allowed to make and sell clothing for all women,文中并没有说seamstresses were not allowed to sell clothing for all women,只是说but were prohibited from producing  men’s clothing or dresses

    for court women.不知这样理解有何不妥,请指正,谢谢!

[此贴子已经被作者于2005-2-27 13:22:19编辑过]
32#
发表于 2005-3-2 18:52:00 | 只看该作者

Q18:

Itcan be inferred from the passage that which of the following was trueof seamstresses employed by relatives who were members of the tailors’guild?


  1. They were instrumental in convincing Louis XIV to establish the seamstresses’ guild.
  2. They were rarely allowed to assist master tailors in the production of men’s clothing.
  3. They were considered by some tailors to be a threat to the tailors’ monopoly.
  4. They did not enjoy the same economic and legal privileges that members of the seamstresses’ guild enjoyed.
  5. They felt their status as working women gave them a certain degree of independence from the patriarchal family.
答案E。D选项可以理解为超出文章范围,文中没有对有亲戚在裁缝行会的女裁缝与其他女裁缝进行比较。与本题有关的内容在38-45行,其中E项是对下面句子的同意改写: < style="font-family: arial;">The seamstresses, however, viewed guild membership as a mark of independence from the patriarchal family.
25楼的"working women"理由不充分,女裁缝是"women"而且也"working",并无不妥。
33#
发表于 2005-3-11 12:36:00 | 只看该作者

17. A.

B中continued to就注定了是错的。文章中根本没提以前的状况。

19. B.

A.emphasize that the establishment of the seamstresses’ guild had implications that were not solely economic  

文中17-20: The conflict between the guilds was not purely economic, however. 说的是conflict,又不是制订guild的conflict.

34#
发表于 2005-3-26 00:12:00 | 只看该作者

支持 18. E  ,  19.A

18題問的是seamstresses employed by relatives who were members of the tailor's guild而最後一段強調的是因為有了(類似)獨自的經濟能力,所以藉此提高身價,而在男人主宰的家庭中有了一點點地位。D不選的理由同32樓。

19題,B中tailor's guild 如果改成seamstresses' guild才有可能對。因為,他們怎麼可能會對tailor's guild有conflict呢?

35#
发表于 2005-3-26 16:13:00 | 只看该作者
with their role as heads of

household, and entitled them

(35)    to employ as seamstresses

female family members who

did not marry outside the trade

谁来解释一下,这话是什么意思?我明白大概的意思,至少是说TAILOR雇佣女裁缝,,,,那个AS什么意思?

36#
发表于 2005-4-9 14:44:00 | 只看该作者

19同意A,B对比对象是MALE TAILOR和 their female family members ,我觉得要对最少应该是

MALE TAILOR和seamstresse比较,family members是该段最后提到的CONTROVERSIAL POINT.
37#
发表于 2005-4-13 16:18:00 | 只看该作者

我的答案是BADA!


19题不同意选B,这篇文章通篇都在说两个guild的conflict, 从来都没说过男裁缝和他们的女家庭成员的conflict啊


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-4-13 16:31:52编辑过]
38#
发表于 2005-4-13 16:28:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用wall_street在2005-3-26 16:13:00的发言:with their role as heads of



household, and entitled them



(35)    to employ as seamstresses




female family members who




did not marry outside the trade



谁来解释一下,这话是什么意思?我明白大概的意思,至少是说TAILOR雇佣女裁缝,,,,那个AS什么意思?


这句话用正常语序看就很好理解了:

entitled them to employ female family members (who did not marry outside the trade) as seamstresses.

他们被赋予了可以雇佣没有与外行业结婚的女性家庭成员做裁缝的权力。


employ sb as sth


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-4-13 16:29:01编辑过]
39#
发表于 2005-4-14 17:57:00 | 只看该作者

对18题还是存有疑问 d的选项在文章里好像找不到对应的地方,请高手指点

40#
发表于 2005-4-18 11:16:00 | 只看该作者

重新看了一遍,赞成18题选E. 题目问的是tailor的亲戚雇佣的女裁缝怎样,而不是问tailor的亲戚怎样

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-9-23 22:21
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部