ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: kidvii
打印 上一主题 下一主题

【每日逻辑链练习贴】【逻辑1-2】

[复制链接]
31#
发表于 2011-11-30 23:56:08 | 只看该作者
第一天汇报~太困了  头重死了。果断去睡了
2-1
conclusion:应该在火车上禁烟
Premise:在公共场合吸烟会让其他人被迫二手烟
题型:method of reasoning
吸烟者在公共场合吸烟——其他人被迫吸二手烟——对他人不健康——应该禁烟

2-3 premise:虽然90%的人知道他们的身体状况,只有20%的人知道DNA。
Conclusion:因此80%不知道哪些药他们不能吃,对自己的健康不能有个很好的把握。

题型:flaw in the reasoning

知道自己的DNA对健康的把握度没有直接关系。
那些80%的人不知道,他们可以让医生进行指导呀。而且一般大家都会记得自己的过敏史,所以根据已知的过敏记录也可以避免这个问题。
32#
发表于 2011-12-1 00:02:34 | 只看该作者
给LZ几个小小的建议哈~

可以根据powerscore里第二到三章  objective1~6

step1:identify the premise and conclusion

step2:Carefully read and identify the question stem(这个好像LZ没有涉及到)
choose from the following:
Must Be True/Most Supported
Main Point
Assumption
Strengthen/Support
Resolve the Paradox
Weaken
Method of Reasoning
Flaw in the Reasoning
Parallel Reasoning 类比
Evaluate the Argument

step3:Prephase: After reading the question stem, take a moment to mentally formulate your answer to the question stem.

还有哈~LZ最好能把答案贴一下。有时候想歪了自己都不知道嘎。答案能验证下自己的想法~

加了个油~晚安~
33#
发表于 2011-12-1 00:13:19 | 只看该作者
给LZ几个小小的建议哈~

可以根据powerscore里第二到三章  objective1~6

step1:identify the premise and conclusion

step2:Carefully read and identify the question stem(这个好像LZ没有涉及到)
choose from the following:
Must Be True/Most Supported
Main Point
Assumption
Strengthen/Support
Resolve the Paradox
Weaken
Method of Reasoning
Flaw in the Reasoning
Parallel Reasoning 类比
Evaluate the Argument

step3:Prephase: After reading the question stem, take a moment to mentally formulate your answer to the question stem.

还有哈~LZ最好能把答案贴一下。有时候想歪了自己都不知道嘎。答案能验证下自己的想法~

加了个油~晚安~
-- by 会员 rocer (2011/12/1 0:02:34)



rocer你好,呵呵,被你挖掘到我们逻辑小分队的旧帖子了,嗯嗯,建议非常好,我们都改进了。可以给我们最新的练习提意见噢!
没有identify the question stem这个练习归队,因为个人觉得这一步比较简单....
34#
发表于 2012-2-13 13:17:30 | 只看该作者
1.premise: the passengers would have to inhaled the smoke which comes from the smoking guys in the commuter train, so the government enact an law to prohibit smoking in commuter train.
  conclusion: And the government should also enact a law about prohibiting the consumption of alcohol in commuter train.
缺少条件2:醉酒的人会开车 对公众产生的危害与吸二手烟一样

2.premise: creatring a false marble need a person with a light hand to excel.
  premise: Picaso can create false marble without a light hand
  conclusion: Picaso is a great artist
错误  第二条件与结论反了

3. background: 80%people think they are well informed with health care
   premise: only 20%people know about DNA and 80% people do not know simple concept of health

   conclusion: at least 80%people cannot make well dicision of public health care

4. background: gray squiral endangers the indigenous owe because the squirals will destroy the bark of the tree where the owe nets
   premise: the governments will put the poison only where the squiral and rodents can reach
   conclusion: the poison will not harm the owe but only squiral.

5. the manager finds that the total sale of the resturant company rise up from last year.
   the accoutant said the sale of each resturant had decreased in comparable to last year and the year before last.
35#
发表于 2012-8-22 10:50:57 | 只看该作者
1、额。。。看了半天才看懂con:政府出台在禁酒的法令,
bg: 出台了在车上禁止抽烟的禁令二者有相似性,喝酒之后开车的司机对          行人的伤害就好像是后上车的人吸入前者剩下的烟一样
que:禁酒令不能禁止的原因是:烟酒的危害相似


2、19‘
bg: only light hand can create marble false
pre: Picasso great artist
con : he can create marble false
que:logical error is not all artist can create marble false


3、1'01"56
pre: Although 90 percent of the population believes itself to be well informed about health care, only 20 percent knows enough about DNA.
con : 80% does not know medical care
que: the argument fails to demonstrate the medical care is most about DNA。
36#
发表于 2012-8-29 15:18:12 | 只看该作者
1 严重超时(到现在也不知道理解的对不对)
con:颁布一个bill,禁止在上下班train中销售和使用酒水。
 re:禁止吸烟保护健康,喝醉的人下train上car产生的danger和不吸烟人被迫呼吸烟雾一样
 Ans:两者有共同之处(喝酒和吸烟)
2 40s
 re:only with light hand 才会有false marble
 However:P is great,so 即使没有 light hand,也会有false marble
 Flaw:P is great 不充分不能代表没有light hand就可以
3 40s
 re:90% know well about health care, 20% know DNA
 Con: 80% do not know well about health care
 Flaw: DNA concept 和 health care 不是一回事儿
4 45s
 re:G破坏了O用的树,Oendanger
 lan: 只在 G和其他orident可接触的地方poison G,不会posion到O
 Weaken: plan 执行了,结果达不到还是posion到O了,因为O和G活动在一个地方
5 超时
 Sales manger: 今年比去年tatal meal sold 增多----》表示顾客对meal 满意
 会计: 反对,每一个饭店的meal 数量减小---》表示对meal 满意度下降了
 Weaken 会计: 不好想。。。。。
 Must be true: total meals 数量不变, 人来的多了, 每个饭店meals 数量下降了
37#
发表于 2012-10-2 10:20:24 | 只看该作者
1.46s
当喝醉的人从c线火车上下来,去开自己的车的时候对公众的危险比在火车上公众的危险大?政府应该禁止酒精在c车线上的销售

2.32s
艺术家创造fm是因为only a light hand can excel?P 没有一个lh但是他能够excelled at creating fm

3.32s
尽管90%知道自己健康,但是仅20%了解DNA.所以至少有80%不知道怎么选择药物和做一些对健康有好处的医疗决定

4.没读懂

5.48s
SM:去年比前年meals数量多?顾客觉得我们desirable
 A:没读懂
38#
发表于 2012-11-1 16:54:02 | 只看该作者
1.30s
BG: recently, the state passed a law to protect passengers by prohibiting smoking in the train.
P: when intoxicated passengers get off the train, the public is exposed to danger as much as the intoxicated passenger himself.
C: the government should pass a law to prohibit alcohol assumption on trains.
Assumption:Alcohol consumption is as harmful to the public as the smoking consumption.
建立喝酒的危害与吸烟的危害之间的联系
2.44s
BG: art marble is created by artist who has a light hand. [light hand:巧手]
P: Picasso is a great artist
C: while Picasso does not have a light hand, he could create an art marble.
Reasoning line: artist?light hand ?can create false marble
3.37s
P: only 20% of people know about DNA
C: 80% of people do not know about how to make good medical choice and good public decision.
Flaw:作者没有建立the relationship between knowledge about DNA and concepts to make good medical decision.
4.40s
The introduction of grey S has jeopardized the local owls by damaging trees which owls nest. So some people suggested that we put poisons to reduce grey S.
P: this poison will only be ingredient to rodents
C: this poison will not hurt owl
削弱:rodent是owl的主要食物来源,所以如果rodent减少,对owl会有伤害(食物链)
5.55s(文章有点长啊。。。)
Sales managers P: total number of meals sold has increased.
Sales managers C: consumers find our meals more desirable
Accountant P: every one of our restaurant opened last year and the year before has faced with a decline in sales of meals.
Accountant C: consumers decreased their desirability to our meals.
削弱accountant:可能是因为餐厅数量超过了顾客的需求量,存在开店过剩的现象
39#
发表于 2012-11-7 11:34:50 | 只看该作者
严重超时
C:政府应该出台禁止买酒和吸烟的政策
P:因为对于喝醉的人开车,对于公众的危害和吸烟对不吸烟的乘客是一样的


39s
B:有一个light hand创造假的m是杰出的
P:P没有light hand可以创造fm
C:P是伟大的艺术家

38s
P:90%的人知道health care,20%知道DNA
C:至少有80%的人不知道医疗概念去做选择或是make plicy

44s
B:s破坏owl的数量,因为他们破坏了o的栖息地
P:投毒来减少s的数量
C:投毒不会减少o的数量,因为只有s会接触到

1’05
S:去年总量的肉增加,说明顾客满意
A:每一个饭店的肉总量都有些下降,顾客满意下降
40#
发表于 2013-3-20 00:39:13 | 只看该作者
1~45s(读了三遍啊,算作弊了……)
Premise: 1.when people are smoking in the public places, the smock will hurt the nonsmokers.
2.the government forbids the smokers to smoke at the public places.
Conclusion: the government will forbid the sale of alcohol on the train,
Assumption: drinking will have the same bad effect on the public as smoking.
2~40s
Premise: 1.only people who have light hands can create a FM.
2.P is a great artist but doesn’t have a light hand
Conclusion: P can create FM.
Parallel: people who are disabled can play basketball well.(不是特别清楚让我做什么,答案有点胡蒙的,不太清楚答题方向啊)
3~45s
Premise: 1.over 90 percent people think they are well informed about health
2.only 20 percent know well about DNA
Conclusion: only a few people know how to keep health
Weakness: although they know little about DNA, they do know a lot about other parts such as nutrients and so on.

4~30s
Premise: 1.GS is threatening the local species.
2.the GS destroys the local nests.
3.scientists are putting poison on where only the GS and other animals appear.
Conclusion: the GS will be controlled without hurting the local species
Weakness: the local species prey on the other animals.

5~1’26’’
Premise: 1.the total number of meal sold in the restaurant increase last year
2.the sale in every sub restaurant decreased last year.
Conclusion: the desirability of the costumers decreased.
Weakness: the sale of the year before was extremely high.

抱歉,我回复的太晚了……明天一定好好做。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-4-19 13:21
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部