GWD 1-16，我错在哪儿啊？

alanis_liu

补充一下，我还是觉得a对

GMAT阿驴

我觉得是B对的  本题是不同年份情况的PROPORTION的比较  请指教

michc

看了大家的讨论很有启发，我最后觉得只有B和C比较合理。

但查阅牛津语法书后，觉得应该排除掉B：

书里是这样写比较级，很有参考价值：

当than前后的动词相同的时候，than后面的可用助动词：

比如：I earn less than he does.

当than后面只是由主语和动词构成，没有其他成分的时候，后面的动词可以省略

比如：He has more time than I(have).

在这道题里面，后面还有一个状语：in any previous election.，所以than后面的动词不应该省略。所以，B不对。

michc

看了大家的讨论很有启发，我最后觉得只有B和C比较合理。

但查阅牛津语法书后，觉得应该排除掉B：

书里是这样写比较级，很有参考价值：

当than前后的动词相同的时候，than后面的可用助动词：

比如：I earn less than he does.

当than后面只是由主语和动词构成，没有其他成分的时候，后面的动词可以省略

比如：He has more time than I(have).

在这道题里面，后面还有一个状语：in any previous election.，所以than后面的动词不应该省略。所以，B不对。

vicomte

选B吧

我觉得把it was提前更通顺一些，it是指代前面的那句话，因为前面的话实际上就是说的一个比率

Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidential campaign of 1992, （it was ）a greater proportion than in any previous election.

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-4-6 16:14:12编辑过]

cocomalawi

Q16:

Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidential campaign of 1992, a greater proportion than it was in any previous election.

1. a greater proportion than it was
   
2. a greater proportion than
   
3. a greater proportion than they have been
   
4. which is greater than was so
   
5. which is greater than it has been

支持Ｃ

时态来看Ａ，Ｃ都可以

但是指代关系一定要用Ｃ，＂比以前的选举．．．比例都要高＂是成本高．主句用的costs所以Ｃ好

Ｂ的省略我觉得口语没问题．正式文体还是不好

hannah1112

C 的时态是错误的，首先排除c,我觉得提炼一下此句应该是这样：

Soaring television costs accounted for a greater proportion in election of 1992 than (television costs had accounted for ) in any previous election

yyallez

C我觉得不对，have been,肯定不行的吧。

按94楼说的，B也不对，我觉得有道理

然后我就觉得还是A好，从逗号后面的句子看，it指proportion.

还是觉得有点混乱...

那我就选A了...

sunnysmell

天那！after 30 mins: 晕就一个字。。。。闪了先

shzzhengfan

这道题的省略我觉得应是这样的：a greater proportion than（the proportion television costs accounted for）in any previous election

拿破仑那题是with more supply than （the supply it had had）for any previous campaign。

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-5-28 15:45:59编辑过]