ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: caterpillar

GWD 1-16,我错在哪儿啊?

[复制链接]
发表于 2005-1-31 07:25:00 | 显示全部楼层
The answer C -a greater proportion than they have been 中的 they 我想是指costs. That's why use THEY. Only my view.
发表于 2005-1-31 10:11:00 | 显示全部楼层

The tense in C is not correct, should be

Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidential campaign of 1992, a greater proportion than they had been in any previous election.

As what nosmoking explained, similar example can be found in OG 198.

Thus, B is a better choice.

发表于 2005-2-20 12:52:00 | 显示全部楼层

猪头小妹,你补出的的“they had been”不对,上面47楼(对不起我不会引用)才是正解

句子补全应该是Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidential campaign of 1992, a greater proportion than (it had been)in any previous election.    it指代 proportion  (引自47楼)

我对所有讨论的总结,有几下几个

1、than 后面,如有代词指代,应该是指代 Proportion 而不是costs

2、如果指代 proportion, 代词用单数是对的(不知道为什么,没有大虾说起,我个人以为,因为后面用any,意思是任何一年,所以单数是对的)

3、如果指代 proportion, 助动词用 be 也是对的

4、A 的问题在于 was 的时态,而B,因为省略了(大虾们认为省略的问题不如时态错误严重吧),所以B对

发表于 2005-2-21 13:23:00 | 显示全部楼层

B 对,因为补全后句子为:

Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidential campaign of 1992, a greater proportion than the proportion  Soaring television costs accounted for in any previous election.

发表于 2005-3-3 05:41:00 | 显示全部楼层

B 对,

我觉得 a greater proportion than in any previous election. 就是一个同位语,补全了应该是

a greater proportion than the proportion in any previous election.

than 前面是个短语, 后面也应该是个短语, 干吗要补出谓语?不理解。补出谓语是不是反而错了?

发表于 2005-3-3 12:27:00 | 显示全部楼层
看清题目,平行主语是COSTS, 所以必须用复数THEY
发表于 2005-3-7 03:41:00 | 显示全部楼层
In OG, there is a question about Napoleon's army has some kind of supplies in Russia compared with "For the previous campains". it is similar to this one and I think this one should be B.
发表于 2005-3-12 15:14:00 | 显示全部楼层

同意57楼的意见,这道题其实就是和拿破仑的那道题OG198道理一样的。

发表于 2005-3-29 06:40:00 | 显示全部楼层
显然B是对的。因为你读B的时候语义是很清楚的.a greater  proportion 是名词性同位语,解释说明more than half the spending...  (It was a greaterproportion than it had been in any previouselection,在比较中,如果没有歧义,相同的部分是可以省略的。所以it had been 省掉。符合ets 得 not wordy
发表于 2005-4-9 13:50:00 | 显示全部楼层

与og198对着看,仔细看这题ets的解释,有助于理解为什么只有B正确!

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-3-29 21:01
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部