gwd 8 7

bobomomo

马鱼JJ 是在说9T D 为什么不对吗！D 我觉得在文章里根本就看不出来not adequately discussed in the industry’s technical literature！

文章只是说！ Though patent
quality is a difficult notion
to measure, the number of
times a patent is cited in
(40) the technical literature is
a reasonable yardstick, and
citations per semiconductor
patent did decline during
the 1980’s.！

而且Q10出了一T WEAKEN ！ BOBO 插嘴的说了！

还有Q7 ，大家都在AC 中争论！我选A ， 但看了大家的讨论 很迷惑！迷惑的确实是文章对STUDY ，是FOR EXAMPLE 说的！

但黑马解释的又很对！还有我觉得有UNANTICIPATED 的！

The system of patentgranting,
which confers
temporary monopolies for
Line the exploitation of new tech-
(5) nologies, was originally
established as an incentive
to the pursuit of risky new
ideas.

almarabbit01

7, I chose A

Maggieyin

key to Q7-10 are A, D, A, E  

lj_hq

以下是引用fair_sword在2004-7-15 8:42:00的发言：

同意A. 文章整体是在描述一个study,  而the connection between patenting and innovation in the semiconductor industry 是这个study的一个内容。

C,有相当大的迷惑性。因为他在文章中大段论述。

偶支持C

不同意第7楼的意见 ，根据文章的主题句：

Yet studies of the
most patent-conscious
(10) business of all—the semiconductor
industry—suggest
that firms do not necessarily
become more innovative as
they increase their patenting
(15) activity.

Ziedonis and Hall,
for example, found that

这说明引用 半导体工业的例子来证明前面的观点

lj_hq

10

which of followin, if true, would most clearly serve to the weaken the author's claim about  what constitute a reasonable resource yardstick for mearuring pantent quality?

A   It is more difficult to have an article accepted for publication in the thchnical literature of the semiconductary industry than it is in the technical literature of other industries

B  many of the high-quality semiconductor patents are cited numerous times in the technical literature

C it is difficult for someone not  fimilar with thchnical literature to recognize what constitute an innovative semiconductor patent

D  There are more citation made per simiconductor patents in the thchnical literature in the 1970's than in the 1980's

E Low-quality patents tend to be discussed in the thchnical literature as frequently as High-quality patents

请问E是怎么来削弱的啊？谢谢！

rings

the number of

times a patent is cited in

(40)  the technical literature is

a reasonable yardstick

如果两种质量的专利discussed(cited)的次数一样多的话就weaken上面的结论了

Patrice

以下是引用horsefish在2004-10-18 4:22:00的发言：

The passage makes which of the following claims about patent quality in the semiconductor industry?

A. It was higher in the early 1980’s than it was a decade later.

B. It is largely independent of the number of patents granted.

C. It changed between 1982 and 1992 in ways that were linked to changes in research and development expenditures.

D. It is not adequately discussed in the industry’s technical literature.

E. It was measured by inappropriate means during the period from 1982 to 1992.

为什么选A？

gwachen

from 30 to 36, the passage explicitly states that the quality of patents declined during the 1980's (1982~1992).

so A is the answer.

zhaoshujuanw

I chose C,which is the real answer

Ggirl

The passage makes which of the following claims about patent quality in the semiconductor industry?

A. It was higher in the early 1980’s than it was a decade later.

B. It is largely independent of the number of patents granted.

C. It changed between 1982 and 1992 in ways that were linked to changes in research and development expenditures.

D. It is not adequately discussed in the industry’s technical literature.

E. It was measured by inappropriate means during the period from 1982 to 1992.

我选的是B. 为什么不对呀?