gwd 8 7

闲云漫舞

同意A，对了GWD的answer还是坚持A

swiffer

同意A，the new strategy of semiconductor industry to manage their patenting process yields unanticipated results--increased number of patents, no increased innovative.

LES

同意C。

１. study of semiconductor industry只是文章中举的例子。

２.文中的主题句是：Yet studies of the
most patent-conscious
(10) business of all—the semiconductor
industry—suggest
that firms do not necessarily
become more innovative as
they increase their patenting
(15) activity.

那么选项中说的 A study　显然是错的。

valarie

Agree on C! The study is not to suggest an approach for patenting but to discuss the connection between patenting and innovation.

joe11

欧觉得 A 好一些。

文章的重心还是在写 patent, 不是 connection 了。不写 patent, 哪来的 connection.

leeon

A.

文章讲的是半导体工业对待专利的方法：专利本来是为了保护创新，在半导体工业效果却相反，半导体工业的厂商拼命压榨专利方面的利润由于激烈的竞争，最后某些处于垄断地位的产品（由于专利限制，造成竞争者无法进入）造成质量下降的结果。

dream1111

A,  it is not emphasizing the connection or no connection, instead it is discussing on why there is not  possitive connection , that is why resulting in an unexpected one.

rhod

文中提到的Yet studies of..., 就说明不是一个study.

这篇文章通篇都是在讨论专利和公司创新能力的关系, 而不是focus on a study.

readytosayno

携隐

studies显示专业和创新没有那么紧密的关系, 下面两个人的study证实了这一点,哪有unanticipate啊