gwd-7-17,gwd-7-27 两道逻辑题目请教

lawyer_1

AR作的大多数维修工作必须重修，重修很令人满意。首次修理不太充分，不是修理人员没水平，而是要求的侧重点不同，二修要求高点。结论两个TAHT并列修饰LEVEL

dancingfrog

A选项取非并不能消弱啊，谁也不知道systematic difference in membership会给两次修理和满意度带来什么影响。哪位nn能解释一下这个选项？

kkgmat

不明白A为什么是假设.就算有systematic difference,如果是first-time jobs比rework jobs的mechanics水平要高,那文中的结论还是可以成立.一个假设如果取非,而结论并不一定受影响,那该假设就不是必要的.

dancingfrog

顶一下，哪位nn能解答一下？

sereny

27.A significant number of complex repair jobs carried out by Ace Repairs have to be reworked under the company’s warranty.  The reworked jobs are invariably satisfactory.  When initial repairs are inadequate, therefore, it is not because the mechanics lack competence; rather, there is clearly a level of focused concentration that complex repairs require that is elicited more reliably by rework jobs than by first-time jobs.

The argument above assumes which of the following?

1. There is no systematic difference in membership between the group of mechanics who do first-time jobs and the group of those who do rework jobs.(对A取非，即两组修理工间有系统差别，则削弱题中所述“一修不充分，不是因为修理工缺乏能力”。因此选A)
2. There is no company that successfully competes with Ace Repairs for complex repair jobs.
3. Ace Repairs’ warranty is good on first-time jobs but does not cover rework jobs.
4. Ace Repairs does not in any way penalize mechanics who have worked on complex repair jobs that later had to be reworked.
5. There is no category of repair jobs in which Ace Repairs invariably carries out first-time jobs satisfactorily.

rings

以下是引用lawyer_1在2004-8-26 10:18:00的发言：
AR作的大多数维修工作必须重修，重修很令人满意。首次修理不太充分，不是修理人员没水平，而是要求的侧重点不同，二修要求高点。结论两个TAHT并列修饰LEVEL

问一个细节:there is clearly a level of focused concentration that complex repairs require (整理是不是少了一个and)that is elicited more reliably by rework jobs than by first-time jobs

如果不是,那这句话的成分是怎么划分的?谢谢律师

haibinyouli

我也读了很多遍，觉得这里两个that都是修饰concentration的。

jd-benyou

关于这两题，我有不同的思路：

这两题有一个很大很大的共同点：结论都是，某某类的人在主观上怎样怎样云。

所以假设的正确答案是：这些人应该具备主观上怎样怎样的可能性，就是从客观上提供他们有主观发挥作用的可能。

ya-ya

以下是引用lawyer_1在2004-8-26 10:18:00的发言：
AR作的大多数维修工作必须重修，重修很令人满意。首次修理不太充分，不是修理人员没水平，而是要求的侧重点不同，二修要求高点。结论两个TAHT并列修饰LEVEL

请问lawyer可以用两个that从句并列修饰level吗, 而且中间不用加and吗?

(这个问题是不是该贴到语法区去呀, 如果贴错了请斑竹帮我移过去)

agape0417

  已經在語法區出現了～～

  http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardID=23&ID=59488&page=2