昨天看南丁格尔篇的一个小心得(虽然重看mumu的分析,觉得这个小心得也没啥),还是把它贴出来和大家分享。
我一直对小安非常神秘的“相关”和“非相关”性很好奇,按他的说法就是用作者的态度来排除选项。昨天在总结南丁格尔这篇时,刚好碰到一个选项觉得似是而非,用这种方法能很有效的排除。木木的定位很好,但我现在对定位还不是很擅长。
77. Which of the following statements regarding the differing interpretations of Nightingale’s importance would the author most likely agree(定位于作者的观点,作者观点的总结句,而不是文中提到的两个观点)?
(A) Summers misunderstood both the importance of Nightingale’s achievements during the Crimean War and her subsequent influence on British policy.
A很好排除,因为S只强调了during the war
(B) The editors of Nightingale’s letters made some valid points about her practical achievements, but they still exaggerated her influence on subsequent genrations. B,就是它让我迷惑,因为我觉得这个选项说的也有一些道理。但是考虑到作者的态度倾向,我
最后把它坚决的排除了,而没有去定位。
(C) Although Summers’ account of Nightingale’s role in the Crimean War may be accurate, she ignored evidence of Nightingales’ subsequent achievement that suggests that her reputation as an eminent social reformer is welldeserved.
c、非常符合作者的态度。再其他选项被排除后就剩它了
(D) The editors of Nightingale’s letters mistakenly propagated the outdated idealization of Nightingale that only impedes attempts to arrive at a balance assessment of her true role.
d、明显与原文不符
(E) The evidence of Nightingale’s letters supports Summers’ conclusions both about Nightingale’s activities and about her influence. e、与原文不符。 |