以下是引用hitlzc在2006-6-13 15:39:00的发言:设A代表事件the policies having correct paper record B代表事件the policies having correct electric record A非:代表the policies having incorrect paper record B非:代表the policies having incorrect electric record (1)所以根据题目: 60 percent of the policies having incorrect paper record have incorrect electric record 可以写成P(A非|B非)=60% 75 percent of the policies having incorrect electric record have incorrect paper record. 可以写成P(B非|A非)=75% 3 percent of all the policies have both incorrect paper and incorrect electric records. 可以写成P(A非*B非)=75%(此处*代表交集的意思) (2)根据条件概率的定义有 P(A非|B非)=P(A非*B非)/P(B非) =》 P(B非)=P(A非|B非)/P(A非*B非)=3%/60%=5% =》P(B)=1-P(B非)=95% P(B非|A非)=P(A非*B非)/P(A非) =》 P(A非)=P(B非|A非)/P(A非*B非)=3%/75%=4% =》P(A)=1-P(A非)=96% (3)要求P(AB)=? 根据[upload=jpg]UploadFile/2006-6/200661315324463328.jpg[/upload] 所以[upload=jpg]UploadFile/2006-6/200661315344495800.jpg[/upload] =》P(AB)=P(A)+P(B)+P(A非*B非)-1=96%+95%+3%-1=94% h,我想反驳一下你的推导,但是不知道是否正确,上面的推理我不太懂,不过加亮的部分我觉得有问题: P(B)=1-P(B非)这个等式能成立么,the policies having correct electric record 和the policies having incorrect electric record这两个加起来不是全集,因为有一部分根本就不是electric record的。同样P(A)=1-P(A非)=96%这个等式也不成立。 不知道这样反驳对不对,我个人还是倾向于这题条件不足,或者把条件中的or改成and,或者把问题中的both and改成either or. 请大家都来讨论一下,赶紧把这题整明白,别让他在这害人了。
[此贴子已经被作者于2006-11-14 21:16:38编辑过] |