逻辑狗狗的疑问，23题“闪亮亮的简历”

魏小妞要出国

你是说这道么~？为什么可以一样呢~？
123. When a group of children who have been watching television programs that include acts of violence is sent to play with a group of children who have been watching programs that do not include acts of violence, the children who have been watching violent programs commit a much greater number of violent acts in their play than do the children who have been watching nonviolent programs. Therefore, children at play can be prevented from commiting violent acts by not being allowed to watch violence on television.

The argument in the passage assumes which one of the following?

A.    Television has a harmful effect on society.
B.    arents are responsible for the acts of their children.
C.    Violent actions and passive observation of violent actions are not related.
D.    There are no other differences between the two groups of children that might account for the difference in violent behavior.
E.    Children who are treated violently will respond with violence.
答案是：D

hnluluowen

我觉得这题是选大部分都是boring的选项；
其实题干根本就没有讨论这些简历到底最后的作用好不好，有没有被雇主录取，题干仅仅只是说了vivid的简历能够脱颖而出，仅此而已，这就是结论！！
所以vivid简历与boring简历的内容有没有一致根本就没有关系，内容一不一致并不能影响简历是否会脱颖而出。