[原创]钢G连之杀G复习计划，情况差不多的朋友可以一齐加油！

ilhht

天蟹MM，我出来冒个泡，我这里有新题目啊，是老外们复习资料用书，我想传上来，结果太大了，传不上去，邮件给你了，你查一下，我这里超多，无语了都，早知道CD我才不买那么多书呢，5555，烧钱啊

要是谁想要的话，留给我一个邮箱，我发给你们。

大家加油！！

[此贴子已经被作者于2009-3-20 19:08:26编辑过]

vivian0331

虽然做过了，但是重复看，烂熟于胸也会有效果。想想，如果你都能把题目、考点背出来了，说明身心完全沉浸在GMAT氛围中，肯定能发挥最佳水平。

加油！

vivian0331

ilhht我们同一天考试，一起复习吧。只是时间上不一定同步，我在职，每天最幸运也只是晚上8点开始看。（北京时间）希望遇到不懂的问题可以互相讨论。

加油！

ilhht

vivian0331，一起复习！我是4月21日（加拿大时间）下午12点多考，一起加油！！

天蝎座1107

楼主MM发给我的文件很强大啊很强大...感谢!!!

fighting127

ilhht MM头像越来越火暴了呵呵 加油

天蝎座1107

fightingMM,楼主MM一看就是暴力解决GMAT,杀个高分回来那种...我属于时而向GMAT妥协型~

baojiakd

以下是引用xxz5838在2009-3-20 13:46:00的发言：

我刚才，把OG和FEIFEI135再看一遍

借宝地问道题：狒狒逻辑５８题：

Some people say that the scarcity of food is a function of the finite limits of the earth’s resources, coupled with a relentless rate of population growth. This analysis fails to recognize, however, that much of the world’s agricultural resources are used to feed livestock instead of people. In the United States, for example, almost one-half of the agricultural acreage is devoted to crops fed to livestock. A steer reduces twenty-one pounds of inexpensive grain to one pound of expensive meat. Thus, the scarcity of food is not merely a function of limited resources and population growth.
Which one of the following is an assumption that would allow the conclusion in the argument to be properly drawn?
(A) People prefer eating meat to eating grain.
(B) Meat is twenty-one times more expensive than grain.
(C) The limits of the earth’s agricultural resources are not finite.
(D) More than one-half of the agricultural acreage in the United States is devoted to drops fed to humans.
(E) Growing crops for human consumption on the acreage currently devoted to crops for livestock will yield more food for more people.

E is the best answer. 喂养牲畜消耗的粮食为人们创造更多的食物。（题目内容是：有观点认为食物缺乏是因为土地资源有限而人口数量却不断增多。但作者认为该观点忽视了农产品中有相当大一部分是用来喂家畜的。在美国几乎有一半土地的粮食是为了养家畜。1磅肉要用去21磅廉价的谷物。因此，食物缺乏不仅是因为土地资源有限而人口数量却不断增多。）根据题目要求，我们只须反驳养家畜对粮食紧缺造成的影响。选项A中即使人们爱吃肉只会引起更多的粮食消耗，不能反驳作者; B并不能充分改变人们的取向；C强词夺理；D重复事实。

我的问题：如果喂家畜消耗的粮食反而产生了更多的食物，那不是就推不出来食物短缺是因为喂家畜了么？

xxz5838

借宝地 Reply baojiakd Feifei135 58

Some people say that the scarcity of food is a function of the finite limits of the earth’s resources, coupled with a relentless rate of population growth. This analysis fails to recognize, however, that much of the world’s agricultural resources are used to feed livestock instead of people. In the United States, for example, almost one-half of the agricultural acreage is devoted to crops fed to livestock. A steer reduces twenty-one pounds of inexpensive grain to one pound of expensive meat. Thus, the scarcity of food is not merely a function of limited resources and population growth.
Which one of the following is an assumption that would allow the conclusion in the argument to be properly drawn?
(A) People prefer eating meat to eating grain.
(B) Meat is twenty-one times more expensive than grain.
(C) The limits of the earth’s agricultural resources are not finite.
(D) More than one-half of the agricultural acreage in the United States is devoted to drops fed to humans.
(E) Growing crops for human consumption on the acreage currently devoted to crops for livestock will yield more food for more people.

The argument is basically saying that the scarcity of food is not only caused by limited resources and population growth, but also caused by the agricultural resources Acreage that are used to feed livestock instead of people. Therefore, if the these acreages can be switched to grow crops fed to people and such corps can produce more food for people, the scarcity of food will be reduced by this practice alone.

(E) basically gives the assumption that those switched acreage will yield more food for more people.

This is how I understand it, hopefully it helps.

[此贴子已经被作者于2009-3-21 0:39:15编辑过]

xxz5838

以下是引用ilhht在2009-3-20 19:03:00的发言：
天蟹MM，我出来冒个泡，我这里有新题目啊，是老外们复习资料用书，我想传上来，结果太大了，传不上去，邮件给你了，你查一下，我这里超多，无语了都，早知道CD我才不买那么多书呢，5555，烧钱啊

要是谁想要的话，留给我一个邮箱，我发给你们。

大家加油！！

Really appreciate your generosity and efforts. This is why CD prospers. Way to go, way to go!

Btw, can't type Chinese at work, hope you all don't mind

[此贴子已经被作者于2009-3-21 0:35:30编辑过]