ChaseDream
搜索
1234下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Press Secretary: Our critics claim that the President's recent highway project cancellations demonstrate a vindictive desire to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties. They offer as evidence the fact that 90 percent of the projects canceled were in such districts. But all of the canceled projects had been identified as wasteful in a report written by respected nonpartisan auditors. So the President's choice was clearly motivated by sound budgetary policy, not partisan politics.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the press secretary's argument depends?

正确答案: B

相关帖子

更多...

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 12870|回复: 35
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]GWD-17-9

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-11-19 16:17:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]GWD-17-9

Press Secretary:  Our critics claim that the President’s recent highway project cancellations demonstrate a vindictive desire to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties.  They offer as evidence the fact that 90 percent of the projects canceled were in such districts.  But all of the canceled projects had been identified as wasteful in a report written by respected nonpartisan auditors.  So the President’s choice was clearly motivated by sound budgetary policy, not partisan politics.



Which of the following is an assumption on which the press secretary’s argument depends?




  • Canceling highway projects was not the only way for the President to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties.

  • The scheduled highway projects identified as wasteful in the report were not mostly projects in districts controlled by the President’s party.

  • The number of projects canceled was a significant proportion of all the highway projects that were to be undertaken by the government in the near future.

  • The highway projects canceled in districts controlled by the President’s party were not generally more expensive than the projects canceled in districts controlled by opposition parties.

  • Reports by nonpartisan auditors are not generally regarded by the opposition parties as a source of objective assessments of government projects.

  • 答案是B。搜不到想关的讨论贴,想不明白。谢谢!

    沙发
     楼主| 发表于 2005-11-20 13:02:00 | 只看该作者
    板凳
     楼主| 发表于 2005-11-21 12:10:00 | 只看该作者
    ,  再顶一下.
    地板
     楼主| 发表于 2005-11-21 18:21:00 | 只看该作者
    5#
    发表于 2005-11-22 04:50:00 | 只看该作者

    认为答案是E.


    大概的意思是说反对党也认为nonpartisan auditors 是公正的。所以说计划是浪费不是乱冤枉人。结论能站住脚。


    如果取非,那就是说计划浪费的报告被反对党认为是故意整人,好像结论就有些站不住脚了。

    6#
    发表于 2005-11-23 21:59:00 | 只看该作者

    我也选了E,想不明白B


    E很像ETS出的标准答案啊。


    结论是根据auditor报告得出来的,自然就从auditor身上找答案咯。


    7#
    发表于 2005-11-23 22:52:00 | 只看该作者

    B


    目的要说明The president'decision is fair.原文说被判断为wasteful并被Cancel的项目的决定是公平的,B说那些同样被判断为wasteful但仍然坚持上马的项目(scheduled highway projects) 并非都是President’s party 的,很好的加强目的。

    8#
    发表于 2005-12-16 17:32:00 | 只看该作者
    以下是引用josan在2005-11-23 22:52:00的发言:

    B


    目的要说明The president'decision is fair.原文说被判断为wasteful并被Cancel的项目的决定是公平的,B说那些同样被判断为wasteful但仍然坚持上马的项目(scheduled highway projects) 并非都是President’s party 的,很好的加强目的。


    是选b e不对是因为它说反对党认为无党派人士的话不足为证,这只是他们的想法, 如果事实上无党派人士的判断是公正的话,还表明总统的做法是有理由的。

    9#
    发表于 2005-12-17 10:11:00 | 只看该作者
    谁能翻译一下B,不好理解?---->阅读能力?
    10#
    发表于 2005-12-21 12:39:00 | 只看该作者

    E is not an assumption. If E is true, then the conclusion is TRUE.


    B is best. Although 90% of cancelled projects are in the control of opposite party, it can still show fair-play of the president if most the scheduled projects are in the control of the opposite party.  


    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

    Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

    手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-23 07:49
    京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

    ChaseDream 论坛

    © 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

    返回顶部