[求助]GWD-17-9

coffemug

先开始和SHAOHELI想的一模一样,但仔细看才知道其实是反方案"不"认为第三方审计是公正的,这样一来就对原文没有帮助了.  所以还是选B.   我觉得用集合图能帮助理解.  拙见.

mko

the key words are " the scheduled highway projects"

lxzjojo

明白鸟！B的关键字其实是那个scheduled highway projects，也就是决定要执行的项目！与文中的canceled projects联系起来就会想明白啦！

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-11-2 15:25:12编辑过]

boochxu

ding

panglin

ding......

boochxu

ding

livetofly

这题真的要选B么？B的意思真的就是之前的朋友们分析的么？请大家读一读下面两句话，看看里面的意思区别在何处？

1。The scheduled highway projects identified as wasteful in the report were not mostly projects in districts controlled by the President’s party.

2。The scheduled highway projects identified as wasteful in the report were not projects in  districts controlled mostly by the President's party.

我的理解：

1。那些在报告中被认定为浪费的但通过了总统裁决的高速公路工程不属于总统所属党派控制区域的大部分的工程。潜台词，这些工程属于总统统治地区，但算不上是主流工程。

2。那些在报告中被认定为浪费的但通过了总统裁决的高速公路工程大部分不属于总统所属党派控制区域的工程。这个应该是大部分朋友理解的意思。

再来看D:

这个题目问得是秘书所依赖的假设是什么。那么我们就要先看看秘书在题目里面为了辩护而做了些什么，他只做了一件事情，就是说所有（100%，不分敌我）的被否决的工程都是由一位公认的受尊敬的无党派人士判定的。判定的依据就是因为这些工程无不浪费（金钱）。

那么要使秘书的话具备说服力，就应当指出来总统所属党派的被否据的工程在花销上不应当比对立政党提议的工程的花销高。既然自己的工程只要花费1000万就能解决却仍然被认定为浪费而被否决，那么对方的需要耗资2000万的工程被判定为浪费就不能够被盖上党派打击的帽子了。

D如果取非，就是总统所属党派被否决的工程都比对立党派的来得斥资高昂，那么把对手相对斥资低廉的工程判为浪费就有些站不住脚了。

LOUI1121

MY OPINION:

LETS USE LAWYERS WAY OF SOLVING THIS QUESTION(USING THE SUPPORT, I.E. THERE IS A GAP). REINTERPRET THE ARGUMENT AS BELOW:

1.90% PROJECTS CANCELLED WERE IN DISTRICTS CONTROLLED BY OPPOSITE PARTY --> PRESIDENT CANCELLATION WAS UNFAIR.

2.CANCELLATION PROJECTS WERE IDENTIFIED AS WASTEFUL IN THE REPORT --> PRESIDENTS CANCELLATION WAS FAIR.

THE GAP THEN IS BETWEEN :

1.DISTRICTS CONTROLLED BY SOME PARTY

2.CANCELLED PROJECTS IDENTIFIED AS WASTEFUL IN THE REPORT.

SO CONNECT ABOVE 2 POINTS UP, IS THE ANSWER B.

E)CHOICE IS HERE TO CONFUSE US. WHEN WE FINISH READING THE PASSAGE ,WE WOULD THINK THAT THE REPORT BY NON-BIASED PEOPLE IS ACUTALLY BIASED. SO WITHOUT CLOST AT IT, WE WOULD CHOOSE E). HOWEVER, LIKE PEOPLE HAVE SAID, E)IS ONLY OPINION FROM THE OPPOSITE PARTY,AFTER NEGATION,  DOES NOT WEAKEN THE ARGUMENT.

I CHOSED E) WHEN I FIRST DID THE QUESTION.

[此贴子已经被作者于2007-1-22 17:50:59编辑过]

abort

B
反对党认为总统实行partisan politics，论据是取消的项目当中有90％都属于反对党管辖的区，Secretary的论点是总统实行budgetary policy，论据是所有取消的项目都是因为无党派人士的报告认为那些项目是wasteful的，言下之意就是在无党派报告中认为是wasteful的项目中有90％都是反对党的项目（相当于B），而B取非的话就是无党派报告中认为是wasteful的项目大部分是总统所在的党派所管辖的地区，那么结论将是总统是partison pollitics，因为总统包庇了自己的党派，punish了反对党