以下是引用LOUI1121在2007-1-22 17:48:00的发言:MY OPINION: LETS USE LAWYERS WAY OF SOLVING THIS QUESTION(USING THE SUPPORT, I.E. THERE IS A GAP). REINTERPRET THE ARGUMENT AS BELOW: 1.90% PROJECTS CANCELLED WERE IN DISTRICTS CONTROLLED BY OPPOSITE PARTY --> PRESIDENT CANCELLATION WAS UNFAIR. 2.CANCELLATION PROJECTS WERE IDENTIFIED AS WASTEFUL IN THE REPORT --> PRESIDENTS CANCELLATION WAS FAIR. THE GAP THEN IS BETWEEN : 1.DISTRICTS CONTROLLED BY SOME PARTY 2.CANCELLED PROJECTS IDENTIFIED AS WASTEFUL IN THE REPORT. SO CONNECT ABOVE 2 POINTS UP, IS THE ANSWER B. E)CHOICE IS HERE TO CONFUSE US. WHEN WE FINISH READING THE PASSAGE ,WE WOULD THINK THAT THE REPORT BY NON-BIASED PEOPLE IS ACUTALLY BIASED. SO WITHOUT CLOST AT IT, WE WOULD CHOOSE E). HOWEVER, LIKE PEOPLE HAVE SAID, E)IS ONLY OPINION FROM THE OPPOSITE PARTY,AFTER NEGATION, DOES NOT WEAKEN THE ARGUMENT. I CHOSED E) WHEN I FIRST DID THE QUESTION. VERY GOOD! TOTALLY SUPPORT~ 看了近15分钟都不明白,现在一看这个解释就明白了 |