揽瓜阁做题小分队 第3天 员工持股

CYJ_

First paragraph4:18)
American company tend to improve their productivity by cost-cutting decreasing the number of employees.
However, the result is not successful as they anticipate.
The remaining workers are increase their workloads.
Second(3:24)
Provide an alternative collaborative plan to boost productivity.
The plan give the employee ownership plans, and employees are happier and more productive than before.
Despite the advantage, it’s still difficult to implement.
Not only the employee are reeducated, but also the manager must be persuaded to accept diminish their power, which might be the reason that many firms prefer to use the original plan.

Answer:
BCDB

提拉拉拉

1.        讲述了企业通过节省成本（裁员和外包）的方式来提升生产力的做法不能产生企业所期盼的结果，短期效应是有，但是长期员工会超负荷导致产量下降。随后举例。
2.        提出新做法，股权激励政策。紧密联系各利益相关方，但是也有缺陷，不易实施。

wong4407

耗費時間：6 min
P1 Downsizing & outsourcing 的效果不如預期的原因與例子 ->
- 員工士氣減少，留下來的員工會loading太大（burnout)
- 例子：1977-1987的結果只略高於人力也在增長的公司
- 例子：股票市場前面6個月的狀況是好的，但是3年之後就underperform

P2 另外一種方法，但是不好執行所以比較少被採用 ->
- 另一種方法：profit sharing & stake-ownership (員工持股）
- 這個方法確實好，但是難以實施，原因：要再教育員工、要說服管理階層他們縮減權利
- 所以採用比較少（回到P1為什麼比較多人用）

答案：
ACDC

B及站士

P1. Downsizing & outsourcing 的效果不如預期, 並呈現相關研究佐證
P2. 提出“collaborative method”, 雖然有效果.但最後提出其實行的困難點
-
P1.
1. Context: downsizing and outsourcing to improve productivity -> less successful than anticipated
2. Research:
a. only slightly more increase (compared with “upsizers”)
b. profits & productivity (increase X)
c. company morale + workers leaving -> remaining workers burnout (underperform…)

P2.
1. New method: “collaborative method” – profit sharing and employee stock-ownership plans
2. Elaborate(advantage):
a. decision-making responsibilities + compensation to performance
b. assurances that layoffs is a last resort
c. happier, more productive, and better paid
3. Limitation: difficult to implement -> workforce be reeducated + diminished authority(managers)

屯个名字

P1:cost-cutting measures的缺点
cost-cutting measures- erosion of workers' benefits and job security
——>(why?) research-1977 to 1987, downsizing company生产率增长的比例略高于"upsizers"；
——>(why?) downsizing company since 1990-利润提高的公司不到一半；1/3实现生产力增长
——>(why?)40% executives unhappy with the result
——>(why?)影响员工士气和离职率
——>(why?)留下的员工倦怠——>股票表现不好

P2:collaborative methods的优缺点(alternative to cost-cutting measures )
collaborative method-profit sharing and employee stock-ownership plans
1.Advantages:
——>increased decision-making responsibilities
——>job security
——>employees tend to be happier, more productive, and better paid
2.disadvantage
——>difficult to implement
workforce be reeducated; managers-diminished authority


ACBB 8’00”

13659111111

ACDC
p1 downsizing 效果不好
P2 manager, shareholders, workers利益捆绑效果好，但是这个计划不好实施

木柚籽

结构：裁员和外包的措施的危害-->研究结果-->第一种方法的替代方法："collaborative" methods-->其优点-->"collaborative" methods没有普及的原因
主题句：Recently, some corporations have begun implementing an alternative to downsizing in order to boost productivity-- a new kind of corporate culture in which the interests of managers, shareholders, and workers are closely and deliberately linked through such devices as profit sharing and employee stock-ownership plans.

木柚籽

出题点：
1、推断（"collaborative" methods没有普及的原因的改写）
2、推断（裁员和外包的措施的危害的改写）
3、推断（"collaborative" methods的优点的改写）
4、逻辑结构（第二段的作用）

joliajjj

新老观点 提高生产力
老观点：降低成本（裁员、外包）的缺点
新观点：股份制员工控股的优缺点
BCDB

andyhhhh

ACAE